{"authority_controls":[{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-01","name":"named-accountable-owner","number":1,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"A named human or institution owns the decision and remedy obligations.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-02","name":"documented-authority-basis","number":2,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"The legal, corporate, contractual, or policy authority is recorded and current.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-03","name":"bounded-purpose-and-scope","number":3,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Purpose, population, geography, time, data, tools, and prohibited uses are explicit.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-04","name":"source-and-data-provenance","number":4,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Material inputs retain origin, time, transformation, access, and integrity provenance.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-05","name":"model-rule-and-limit-disclosure","number":5,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"The system role, rule layer, model limitations, uncertainty, and abstention conditions are visible to reviewers.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-06","name":"independent-evidence-view","number":6,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"The reviewer can inspect material evidence and alternatives without depending solely on the model summary.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-07","name":"adequate-time-and-workload","number":7,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Time, queue size, staffing, and interface design permit actual scrutiny.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-08","name":"refusal-and-escalation-authority","number":8,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"The reviewer can reject, hold, escalate, or seek evidence without automatic adverse action.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-09","name":"effective-technical-intervention","number":9,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, and safe-state controls are tested under realistic latency.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-10","name":"segregation-of-duties","number":10,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Model owner, operator, adjudicator, auditor, and correction authority are separated where risk requires.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-11","name":"attributable-identity-and-key-custody","number":11,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Human and service actions are attributable; keys and privileged identities have accountable custody.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-12","name":"dissent-incident-and-near-miss-preservation","number":12,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Dissent, overrides, incidents, near misses, and rejected recommendations remain auditable.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-13","name":"notice-and-explanation","number":13,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Affected people receive the responsible institution, material basis, limits, and available next steps when law and safety permit.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-14","name":"appeal-and-redress","number":14,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"An appeal reaches a human or institution with authority and resources to change the result.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-15","name":"correction-propagation","number":15,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Accepted correction repairs every applicable canonical, public, memory, cache, derived, consumer, and successor target.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"},{"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","control_id":"AIGOV-CONTROL-80-16","name":"sunset-successor-and-revalidation","number":16,"real_evidence_count":0,"requirement":"Authority and controls expire or are revalidated after material changes; successor systems inherit unresolved obligations.","state":"REQUIRED_NOT_EXTERNALLY_CERTIFIED"}],"authority_state":{"accepted_changes":0,"accepted_corrections":0,"accepted_review_imports":0,"boundary":"Prepared is not executed. Submitted is not accepted. A fixture is not a real reviewer, adjudicator, correction, acknowledgment, migration, participant, or endorsement. Schema-valid, checksum-valid, signature-valid, source-preserved, transport-accepted, or market-listed is not truth, legality, fiduciary compliance, downstream repair, democratic legitimacy, investment suitability, publication approval, production authorization, human accessibility certification, specialist review, civil-rights review, scientific review, clinical review, or operational effectiveness.","completed_human_sessions":0,"direct_external_acknowledgments":0,"hosting_approval":"NOT_GRANTED","human_accessibility_certification":"INCOMPLETE","human_participants":0,"human_testing":"PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED","independent_civil_rights_review":"INCOMPLETE","independent_legal_review":"INCOMPLETE","independent_scientific_review":"INCOMPLETE","investment_advice_provided":false,"production_authorization":"NOT_GRANTED","proven_production_migrations":0,"publication_approval":"NOT_GRANTED","real_external_correction_requests":0,"real_review_submissions":0,"release":"2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.80","repository_adjudications":0,"schema":"psychologicalwar.ai-governance-authority-state.v1"},"boundary":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","decision_trace_stages":[{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":1,"requirement":"Acquire an authorized source and record provenance.","stage":"source-acquisition","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-01"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":2,"requirement":"Confirm lawful or organizational basis before processing.","stage":"legal-or-organizational-basis","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-02"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":3,"requirement":"Resolve the subject or entity while preserving ambiguity and mismatch risk.","stage":"identity-and-entity-resolution","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-03"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":4,"requirement":"Assess completeness, accuracy, timeliness, subgroup effects, and missingness.","stage":"data-quality-and-representativeness","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-04"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":5,"requirement":"Document transformations, proxies, thresholds, and policy assumptions.","stage":"feature-or-rule-construction","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-05"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":6,"requirement":"Record the model, rule, version, owner, intended use, and excluded use.","stage":"model-or-rule-selection","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-06"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":7,"requirement":"Produce a bounded output without silently converting it into authority.","stage":"inference-or-recommendation","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-07"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":8,"requirement":"Expose calibration, uncertainty, alternative hypotheses, stale evidence, and abstention.","stage":"confidence-uncertainty-and-alternatives","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-08"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":9,"requirement":"Present independently intelligible evidence, not only a score or summary.","stage":"human-evidence-view","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-09"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":10,"requirement":"Disclose reviewer, vendor, institutional, and compensation conflicts.","stage":"conflict-and-compensation-disclosure","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-10"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":11,"requirement":"Verify the decision-maker, authority, purpose, scope, and expiration.","stage":"authority-and-scope-check","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-11"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":12,"requirement":"Record the human decision, dissent, requested evidence, and authority used.","stage":"approval-refusal-or-escalation","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-12"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":13,"requirement":"Execute only through bounded tools and record the exact external state change.","stage":"execution","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-13"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":14,"requirement":"Monitor outcomes, drift, security, overrides, incidents, and near misses.","stage":"monitoring-and-incident-response","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-14"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":15,"requirement":"Provide notice and explanation where lawful and safe.","stage":"affected-person-notice","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-15"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":16,"requirement":"Receive and adjudicate challenges through an authorized human process.","stage":"appeal-and-redress","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-16"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":17,"requirement":"Repair every applicable target and prove closure separately.","stage":"correction-propagation","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-17"},{"automated_completion_sufficient":false,"human_authority_required":true,"number":18,"requirement":"Expire, retire, migrate, or revalidate the system without losing unresolved duties.","stage":"sunset-successor-and-retirement","stage_id":"AIGOV-TRACE-80-18"}],"generated_at_utc":"2026-08-03T18:00:00Z","record_count":15,"records":[{"accountable_owner":"Named minister, agency head, or lawful decision body","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Constitution, statute, regulation, delegated administrative authority, or recorded policy mandate","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Retrieve, summarize, compare scenarios, forecast bounded indicators, and recommend options","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Exercise sovereign or statutory authority; adopt policy; order coercive action; or waive legal duties","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":1,"pattern_name":"National policy decision support","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/delegated-authority-and-human-responsibility","record_digest_sha256":"c74629f26499d60273479a315edf7b8db0a38a7e0583b5342cdf66c16362d16a","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"National / public administration","source_claim_scope":"Synthetic political actors, state decision support, proxy responsibility, democratic authority, and public-administration boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Governance In Nations.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-01-national-policy-decision-support","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Authorized emergency-management official or incident command","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Emergency law, incident-command plan, and agency delegation","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Fuse reports, estimate resource demand, route alerts, and propose response options","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Declare an emergency, compel conduct, restrict rights, or authorize extraordinary powers","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":2,"pattern_name":"Emergency-management coordination","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/delegated-authority-and-human-responsibility","record_digest_sha256":"cf518d5dc77523be48dc1ba91fd79e0d6adfff81a078bb6c8322717f1358f003","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"National / regional / municipal","source_claim_scope":"Synthetic political actors, state decision support, proxy responsibility, democratic authority, and public-administration boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Governance In Nations.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-02-emergency-management-coordination","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Named department director and authorized case decision-maker","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Municipal code, benefits law, service rule, or approved administrative procedure","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Classify requests, prioritize queues, identify missing records, and draft explanations","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Determine legal eligibility, terminate benefits, impose debt, or deny due process without lawful human decision","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":3,"pattern_name":"Municipal benefits or service triage","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/municipal-procurement-administrative-law-and-appeals","record_digest_sha256":"054388f5ace013dda1fccc911b66ddf03131a265ebc6f06c26948dc37d67d3d5","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Municipal administration","source_claim_scope":"Municipal AI, digital twins, urban operating systems, administrative process, procurement, access, and redress.","source_report":"AI in Municipal Governance.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-03-municipal-benefits-triage","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Named public-works authority and accountable vendor owner","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Procurement contract, safety code, operational policy, and public authority","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Model infrastructure state, predict maintenance needs, and recommend scheduling","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Authorize unsafe operation, conceal uncertainty, override safety law, or replace accountable engineering judgment","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":4,"pattern_name":"Municipal infrastructure digital twin","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/municipal-procurement-administrative-law-and-appeals","record_digest_sha256":"229d177a137460c5631dbaf41a6b39d13a0ce1149291f9f782577f881b800d54","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Municipal infrastructure","source_claim_scope":"Municipal AI, digital twins, urban operating systems, administrative process, procurement, access, and redress.","source_report":"AI in Municipal Governance.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-04-municipal-infrastructure-digital-twin","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Named public-safety official with legally bounded authority","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Public-safety law, departmental policy, civil-rights limits, and documented purpose","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Map incidents, correlate records, prioritize review, and recommend nonbinding resource options","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Create guilt, probable cause, warrant authority, or coercive power merely from a score or alert","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":5,"pattern_name":"Municipal public-safety analytics","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/municipal-procurement-administrative-law-and-appeals","record_digest_sha256":"2736813614d79f6bea8f8aa90c93aed8b7ece11c4e8a2c737cb50bb0bc2a1750","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Municipal public safety","source_claim_scope":"Municipal AI, digital twins, urban operating systems, administrative process, procurement, access, and redress.","source_report":"AI in Municipal Governance.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-05-municipal-public-safety-analytics","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Authorized procurement official and review board","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Procurement law, bid criteria, conflict rules, and appeal procedure","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Check documents, compare criteria, flag inconsistencies, and propose rankings","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Award a contract, waive mandatory criteria, hide conflicts, or deny protest rights","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":6,"pattern_name":"Public procurement vendor scoring","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/municipal-procurement-administrative-law-and-appeals","record_digest_sha256":"27ea72280ba588e21d60806f6c8258dd10c02edf6f9da620c657db108b9c354f","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Public procurement","source_claim_scope":"Synthetic political actors, state decision support, proxy responsibility, democratic authority, and public-administration boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Governance In Nations.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-06-public-procurement-vendor-scoring","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Human directors and board committees","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Corporate law, charter, bylaws, fiduciary duties, and board resolutions","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Analyze materials, model scenarios, identify risks, and draft recommendations","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Serve as a legal director, discharge fiduciary duty, vote independently, or absorb liability","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":7,"pattern_name":"Corporate board decision support","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/corporate-and-municipal-decision-trace","record_digest_sha256":"842d1bac8bec27fd38e4d057bc03476da0e434e56bce80486b6fcc3a372c84f7","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Corporate governance","source_claim_scope":"Algorithmic executive functions, board and officer responsibility, fiduciary duty, and legal-wrapper boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Corporate Leadership.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-07-corporate-board-decision-support","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Human officers, directors, and designated control owners","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Corporate authority matrix, delegated operating policy, and fiduciary obligations","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Plan tasks, route work, propose pricing, allocate resources, and monitor operations","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Become a lawful officer, bind the company outside delegated authority, or replace accountable human judgment","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":8,"pattern_name":"Algorithmic executive workflow","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/corporate-and-municipal-decision-trace","record_digest_sha256":"f275f4ec3c01e9d8c9c25b6d2799fe2788ec4d33356bd9b1b774a139143cfeee","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Corporate operations","source_claim_scope":"Algorithmic executive functions, board and officer responsibility, fiduciary duty, and legal-wrapper boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Corporate Leadership.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-08-algorithmic-executive-workflow","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Human owner, manager, director, or legally recognized entity controller","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Entity law, account authority, contracts, banking controls, and operating policy","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Orchestrate agents, use bounded tools, manage routine commerce, and propose operational changes","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Own property as an AI, evade beneficial-owner duties, self-expand authority, or make unreviewable high-impact decisions","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":9,"pattern_name":"Autonomous-enterprise operations","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/corporate-and-municipal-decision-trace","record_digest_sha256":"05683eabd56bea54814860f8541f24adaa2f1bb9e23050966404c340786f6116","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Autonomous enterprise","source_claim_scope":"Agentic enterprise operation, autonomous workflows, tool use, liability, security, and ownership claims.","source_report":"AI Owned and Run Businesses.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-09-autonomous-enterprise-operations","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Licensed institution and named accountable officers","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Financial law, underwriting policy, model-risk governance, and fair-treatment duties","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Extract factors, estimate risk, prioritize review, and recommend pricing within bounded rules","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Create lawful discrimination, conceal adverse-action reasons, or transfer compliance obligations to a model","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":10,"pattern_name":"Financial underwriting and risk pricing","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/public-market-claim-boundaries","record_digest_sha256":"a79240c83251ee5b4883a37fea14678d16360f1fc74ca5b839c6624b67344377","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Finance / insurance","source_claim_scope":"Public-market AI exposure, business-model distinctions, disclosure, and investment-neutrality boundaries.","source_report":"Publicly Traded AI Companies.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-10-financial-underwriting-and-pricing","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Issuer officers, disclosure committee, auditors, and board","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Securities law, accounting rules, listing obligations, and disclosure controls","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Inventory AI systems, draft disclosures, compare metrics, and flag inconsistencies","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Certify material accuracy, establish valuation, or provide investment suitability","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":11,"pattern_name":"Public-company AI disclosure and claims","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/public-market-claim-boundaries","record_digest_sha256":"412c2c2cd0d0d6f9e28d04ae7dd2e9527796ac7233648e67945c9142f6e387f5","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Public markets","source_claim_scope":"Public-market AI exposure, business-model distinctions, disclosure, and investment-neutrality boundaries.","source_report":"Publicly Traded AI Companies.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-11-public-company-ai-disclosure","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Employer, named managers, and authorized human-resources decision-makers","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Employment law, collective agreements, workplace policy, and accommodations duties","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Schedule work, summarize performance signals, and recommend review","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Terminate, discipline, deny accommodation, or evade labor rights solely through opaque automation","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":12,"pattern_name":"Employment scheduling and performance management","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/corporate-and-municipal-decision-trace","record_digest_sha256":"14f5ccdc060c8d216752006f09121470bf029f31029f9eb87517f13b6f9b4f8e","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Employment","source_claim_scope":"Algorithmic executive functions, board and officer responsibility, fiduciary duty, and legal-wrapper boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Corporate Leadership.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-12-employment-algorithmic-management","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Named service owner and authorized complaint adjudicator","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Consumer law, service terms, complaint policy, and escalation procedure","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Answer routine questions, retrieve records, classify complaints, and propose resolutions","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Waive legal rights, make binding settlements, or close serious complaints without accountable review","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":13,"pattern_name":"Customer service and complaint resolution","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/corporate-and-municipal-decision-trace","record_digest_sha256":"41f24b71f343946985cc8080be373cf9495e7b3473fa0d81a39e3099433d8932","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Consumer operations","source_claim_scope":"Agentic enterprise operation, autonomous workflows, tool use, liability, security, and ownership claims.","source_report":"AI Owned and Run Businesses.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-13-customer-service-and-complaint-resolution","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Named security owner and incident commander","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Security policy, incident plan, access-control rules, and contractual authority","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Detect anomalies, isolate bounded assets, rotate credentials, and recommend containment","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Expand privileges, destroy evidence, affect third parties, or execute irreversible action outside preauthorized bounds","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":14,"pattern_name":"Cybersecurity autonomous response","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/corporate-and-municipal-decision-trace","record_digest_sha256":"02e4005a4a454cf305a65a8d84be1d40322557349288ae0b47cb19bd0d0c8a8a","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Cybersecurity","source_claim_scope":"Agentic enterprise operation, autonomous workflows, tool use, liability, security, and ownership claims.","source_report":"AI Owned and Run Businesses.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-14-cybersecurity-autonomous-response","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."},{"accountable_owner":"Named campaign, party, public office, or institutional publisher","appeal_and_redress":"Appeal must reach an authorized human or institution capable of changing the outcome and repairing downstream records.","authority_source":"Election law, public-information authority, platform rules, and attribution policy","correction_and_reopening":"Correction closure requires target-specific repair evidence; later contradictory evidence can reopen the record.","currentness_state":"SOURCE_DATE_BOUNDED_REVIEW_REQUIRED","delegated_ai_role":"Draft, translate, personalize, schedule, and analyze communications","evidence_state":"SOURCE_BOUNDED_ANALYTICAL_CONTROL_MODEL","explicit_unknowns":"The source reports do not establish one universal deployment state, legal rule, or control arrangement for every named or implied example.","human_evidence_view":"The accountable human must receive independently intelligible source, uncertainty, alternative, conflict, and consequence information rather than only a ranked recommendation.","intervention_mechanism":"A tested pause, rollback, shutdown, credential revocation, or safe-state path must match the consequence and timing of the delegated function.","non_delegable_act":"Become a democratic representative, fabricate authority, conceal synthetic identity where disclosure is required, or make official decisions","notice_and_explanation":"Affected people should receive legally and operationally appropriate notice, the responsible institution, the material basis, and the available challenge path.","number":15,"pattern_name":"Synthetic political or public communication actor","prohibited_inference":"AI assistance is not legal office-holding. Technical capability is not delegated authority. Delegated workflow is not delegated fiduciary duty. A model recommendation is not a lawful public or corporate act. A human legal wrapper does not make machine judgment independently accountable. A municipal dashboard, digital twin, or urban operating system is not democratic legitimacy. A public-company AI claim, ticker, revenue figure, valuation, or market forecast is not investment suitability. A pilot, press release, procurement notice, demonstration, symbolic appointment, or vendor claim is not verified autonomous control. Formal human presence is not meaningful review without knowledge, time, independence, authority, and an effective intervention path.","public_route":"/psyops/ai-governance/delegated-authority-and-human-responsibility","record_digest_sha256":"b0baffcd80755000b202d489348c7737bf74802d7c231538e4d7ddda824e4636","refusal_authority":"The authorized human must be able to reject, hold, escalate, or request additional evidence without an undocumented penalty or automatic adverse default.","sector":"Political communication / public information","source_claim_scope":"Synthetic political actors, state decision support, proxy responsibility, democratic authority, and public-administration boundaries.","source_report":"AI Proxy Governance In Nations.md","stable_id":"AIGOV-80-15-synthetic-political-or-public-communication","sunset_and_successor":"Delegation expires or is revalidated on material system, vendor, data, authority, purpose, or operating-context change; successor systems inherit unresolved duties."}],"release":"2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.80","representation_digest_sha256":"ec3ed7a47555ffbc083ac412a850038eeebe29723773b89eab2a8bf953ad1515","schema":"psychologicalwar.ai-governance-accountability-registry.v2","schema_state":"CURRENT_DEFAULT_NOT_DEPRECATED"}