{
    "schema": "psychologicalwar.public-claim-status-export.v1",
    "schema_version": 1,
    "release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
    "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
    "canonical_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json?schema=v1",
    "human_readable_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status",
    "currentness_version": 15,
    "currentness_record_count": 18,
    "claim_count": 13,
    "history_record_count": 130,
    "authority_counts": {
        "real_review_submissions": 0,
        "repository_adjudications": 0,
        "accepted_review_imports": 0,
        "accepted_corrections": 0,
        "completed_specialist_dispositions": 0,
        "named_reviewers": 0,
        "public_reviewer_identity_authorizations": 0,
        "real_external_correction_requests": 0,
        "real_external_correction_acknowledgments": 0,
        "proven_production_consumer_migrations": 0,
        "human_participants": 0,
        "human_sessions_completed": 0
    },
    "human_testing": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
    "signed_packet_profile": "TEST_PROFILE_IMPLEMENTED_NOT_PRODUCTION_TRUST",
    "claims": [
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Reversal is not complete repair",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-01-repair",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-01-repair",
            "current_wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
            "record_digest_sha256": "4e90112e59d8faf67fd3f218e14acaf3a93aea074c924cd6c0ae4cdd21637796",
            "plain_language_summary": "Stopping or reversing an error does not automatically repair every copied record or downstream harm.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_AUTHORITY_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Remedy must be decomposed into notice, access, authoritative review, reversal, restoration, data correction, downstream propagation, compensation, repeat prevention, and unresolved harm.",
            "does_not_establish": "That every appealed system fails downstream repair or that every reversal is ineffective.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "A source shows complete downstream correction and remediation for a cited case.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-03-META-OVERSIGHT-AYAHUASCA",
                    "title": "Meta Oversight Board decision: Ayahuasca brew",
                    "url": "https://www.oversightboard.com/decision/ig-0u6fla5b/",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_PLATFORM_APPEAL_DECISION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_APPELLATE_DECISION",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Meta Oversight Board",
                    "publication_date": "2021-01-28",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "DECISION_FINAL_WITHIN_BOARD_PROCESS",
                    "jurisdiction": "Platform governance — global service context",
                    "supports": [
                        "Removal and appellate reversal",
                        "Notice and rule-clarity deficiencies",
                        "Restoration ordered after appeal"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Restoration of prior reach or recommendation position",
                        "Correction of all account or ranking signals",
                        "Compensation or complete downstream repair"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Restoration of prior reach or recommendation position; Correction of all account or ranking signals; Compensation or complete downstream repair",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Restoration of prior reach or recommendation position",
                        "Correction of all account or ranking signals",
                        "Compensation or complete downstream repair"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-04-ROBODEBT-ROYAL-COMMISSION",
                    "title": "Report of the Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme",
                    "url": "https://robodebt.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/report",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_INQUIRY_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_REPORT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OFFICIAL_INQUIRY",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Australian Government — Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme",
                    "publication_date": "2023-07-07",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "FINAL_REPORT_AS_PUBLISHED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Official inquiry findings and chronology",
                        "Institutional process failures",
                        "Published testimony and affected-person evidence within the inquiry record"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That every individual harm or death had one exclusive cause",
                        "That all automated public-benefit systems share the same design",
                        "A universal remedy outcome"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That every individual harm or death had one exclusive cause; That all automated public-benefit systems share the same design; A universal remedy outcome",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That every individual harm or death had one exclusive cause",
                        "That all automated public-benefit systems share the same design",
                        "A universal remedy outcome"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-35-ROBODEBT-2026-SETTLEMENT",
                    "title": "New Robodebt class action settlement",
                    "url": "https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/new-robodebt-class-action-settlement?context=60271",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_SETTLEMENT_IMPLEMENTATION_NOTICE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "OFFICIAL_NOTICE_OF_FEDERAL_COURT_APPROVED_SETTLEMENT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Services Australia / Federal Court-approved settlement information",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-26",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Settlement approval date",
                        "Additional compensation amount and relation to earlier refunds and debt zeroing",
                        "Appointment of a settlement administration process"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Individual complete repair",
                        "Correction of every downstream record or inference",
                        "A merits judgment on every disputed issue"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Individual complete repair; Correction of every downstream record or inference; A merits judgment on every disputed issue",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Individual complete repair",
                        "Correction of every downstream record or inference",
                        "A merits judgment on every disputed issue"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-36-ROBODEBT-INCOME-APPORTIONMENT-RESOLUTION",
                    "title": "Income Apportionment Resolution Scheme",
                    "url": "https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/income-apportionment-resolution-scheme?context=60271",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_REMEDY_PROGRAM_NOTICE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_REMEDY_PROGRAM_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Services Australia",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence, eligibility pathway, and dates of the resolution scheme",
                        "A separate remedy mechanism for eligible affected people"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Take-up, accessibility, approval, or rejection rates",
                        "Complete compensation",
                        "Downstream data correction or repeat-error prevention"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Take-up, accessibility, approval, or rejection rates; Complete compensation; Downstream data correction or repeat-error prevention",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Take-up, accessibility, approval, or rejection rates",
                        "Complete compensation",
                        "Downstream data correction or repeat-error prevention"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-37-ROBODEBT-NACC-MYRTLEFORD",
                    "title": "Operation Myrtleford investigation report",
                    "url": "https://www.nacc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2026-03/Operation%20Myrtleford%20Investigation%20Report.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ANTI_CORRUPTION_INVESTIGATION_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_INDEPENDENT_INVESTIGATION_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Australian National Anti-Corruption Commission",
                    "publication_date": "2026-03-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "The scope and findings of the NACC investigation",
                        "Specific accountability findings concerning events in 2015 and 2017"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Criminal conviction",
                        "Complete institutional reform",
                        "Complete repair to affected people"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Criminal conviction; Complete institutional reform; Complete repair to affected people",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Criminal conviction",
                        "Complete institutional reform",
                        "Complete repair to affected people"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-24-SYRI-DATA-DESTRUCTION",
                    "title": "Parliamentary answers concerning SyRI data destruction and decision use",
                    "url": "https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-31066-1051.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_PARLIAMENTARY_ANSWER",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_EXECUTIVE_ANSWER_TO_PARLIAMENT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Government of the Netherlands — House of Representatives records",
                    "publication_date": "2022-06-21",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Netherlands",
                    "supports": [
                        "An official statement that SyRI-processed data had been destroyed by June 2022",
                        "An official statement that responsible bodies did not make decisions based on SyRI-derived data",
                        "SyRI algorithms and criteria were not used in the named Detectie aan de Poort systems"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent forensic verification of destruction",
                        "Deletion from every backup, derivative, vendor, or institutional system",
                        "Complete repair for communities subjected to SyRI projects"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent forensic verification of destruction; Deletion from every backup, derivative, vendor, or institutional system; Complete repair for communities subjected to SyRI projects",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent forensic verification of destruction",
                        "Deletion from every backup, derivative, vendor, or institutional system",
                        "Complete repair for communities subjected to SyRI projects"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm.",
                    "wording_sha256": "142588df2e74c96e99cec35f4dffd1c40e8e30b140164151346a932997ddfe0c",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 1,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-01-repair-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "58ef08951dd3d8e73b23e09fa1a70c4ea1fc095b14e66795796db5a3d9a54ecc"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. The 2026 Robodebt settlement and resolution schemes document additional remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "74c79bb0c609b2371ebfef9d5af1ab873d982c07958db9eb503841b5d7f69a32",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Added 2026 remedy implementation context while retaining the incomplete-repair boundary.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-01",
                    "number": 2,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-01-repair-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "6a41ee91ea75e09b3893b0cddae3c7c88615a7541ec9e430ece5c94381a04249"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-01",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-02",
                    "number": 3,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-01-repair-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "d425b06ab2d7042d4bf60c06abcc58ada5194a4a2f9528eadd86a2003e995d28"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-01",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-03",
                    "number": 4,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-01-repair-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "13f4b8a373b86aa3cc7597661546f68d34766ba72bc236ddfa99b6f4791856c6"
                },
                {
                    "number": 53,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-01",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "13f4b8a373b86aa3cc7597661546f68d34766ba72bc236ddfa99b6f4791856c6",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-01-repair-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "d4143a490a4e3561ee1ec05a290f36405edb1723bf9fb804159d40f4aefcffae"
                },
                {
                    "number": 66,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-01",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "d4143a490a4e3561ee1ec05a290f36405edb1723bf9fb804159d40f4aefcffae",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-01-repair-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "9fd1509567559b91a7bc61f7beee2589d949aa8a481eed052866a0551a0a9333"
                },
                {
                    "number": 79,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-01",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "9fd1509567559b91a7bc61f7beee2589d949aa8a481eed052866a0551a0a9333",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "9a29e70c3718973b5794685e5ff2f3c8cce098c5dd8c0b800c48ccc13f5e7d07"
                },
                {
                    "number": 92,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "A successful appeal, reversal, settlement, or restored account can stop an immediate error without repairing every copied record, derived score, ranking signal, vendor system, financial loss, reputational consequence, or psychological harm. Federal Court approval on 23 June 2026 of an additional Robodebt settlement documents compensation and remedy stages, not proof of complete downstream repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-01",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-01-REPAIR-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "9a29e70c3718973b5794685e5ff2f3c8cce098c5dd8c0b800c48ccc13f5e7d07",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "c053dbcc70fd5629d622f12034ce0b5080ec0f44153def96c4b647b1cd88a1bc",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-01-repair",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "a92272a6d5c3ca39a2b1ce3953e49844ee8a5f6eab2c87cf0b9f2d2b0bebcf11"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "b784ca9d112769368b22eb1e693dbae91c83f7e67a458c929bf52e2c516eec84",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Deletion and output blocking are not model unlearning",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-02-unlearning",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-02-unlearning",
            "current_wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
            "record_digest_sha256": "d80ee8995eab9f042d574bc63a84ffdb9030c03cebdc5b68dee9add250d5581e",
            "plain_language_summary": "Deleting source data or blocking outputs is different from proving that a model has unlearned an influence.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_AUTHORITY_CLOSURE_SUBSTANTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, retraining, and influence removal are distinct interventions.",
            "does_not_establish": "That exact unlearning is feasible for every model or that a specific implementation satisfies law.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "NIST or a recognized standard adopts a materially different definition.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-08-NIST-MACHINE-UNLEARNING",
                    "title": "NIST glossary entry: Machine Unlearning",
                    "url": "https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/machine_unlearning",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_TECHNICAL_DEFINITION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OFFICIAL_DEFINITION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology",
                    "publication_date": "2025-01-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_ACCESSED",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — technical reference",
                    "supports": [
                        "A bounded authoritative definition of machine unlearning",
                        "The distinction between training-data influence removal and simple record deletion"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That every unlearning method is exact",
                        "That output blocking removes model influence",
                        "Legal compliance for any specific implementation"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That every unlearning method is exact; That output blocking removes model influence; Legal compliance for any specific implementation",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That every unlearning method is exact",
                        "That output blocking removes model influence",
                        "Legal compliance for any specific implementation"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-09-SISA-UNLEARNING",
                    "title": "Machine Unlearning (SISA training architecture)",
                    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03817",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_RESEARCH_PREPRINT",
                    "source_tier": "PUBLIC_RESEARCH_RECORD_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_RESEARCH_ARTICLE",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Peer-reviewed research authors / arXiv record",
                    "publication_date": "2019-12-09",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_FOUNDATIONAL_RESEARCH",
                    "jurisdiction": "Research literature",
                    "supports": [
                        "A concrete architecture for efficient data-removal workflows",
                        "Technical distinction between full retraining and bounded retraining"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Perfect unlearning for every model class",
                        "Legal sufficiency",
                        "Removal from downstream vendors, logs, or backups"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Perfect unlearning for every model class; Legal sufficiency; Removal from downstream vendors, logs, or backups",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Perfect unlearning for every model class",
                        "Legal sufficiency",
                        "Removal from downstream vendors, logs, or backups"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-40-GOOGLE-UNLEARNING-AUDIT-2026",
                    "title": "New framework for auditing machine unlearning",
                    "url": "https://research.google/blog/new-framework-for-auditing-machine-unlearning/",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_RESEARCH_ANNOUNCEMENT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_RESEARCH_SUMMARY",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Google Research",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-10",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global machine-learning research",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence and described scope of a new auditing framework",
                        "The distinction between performing and auditing unlearning",
                        "The need for statistical evidence rather than UI-level deletion claims"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Exact deletion in deployed foundation models",
                        "Production deployment across vendors",
                        "Elimination of every memorized or inferential effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Exact deletion in deployed foundation models; Production deployment across vendors; Elimination of every memorized or inferential effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Exact deletion in deployed foundation models",
                        "Production deployment across vendors",
                        "Elimination of every memorized or inferential effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-41-ICLR-BENIGN-RELEARNING",
                    "title": "Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning",
                    "url": "https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/18fd48d9cbbf9a20e434c9d3db6973c5-Paper-Conference.pdf",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_MACHINE_UNLEARNING_EVALUATION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PEER_REVIEWED_EMPIRICAL_SECURITY_EVALUATION",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "ICLR 2025 peer-reviewed research",
                    "publication_date": "2025-04-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global machine-learning research",
                    "supports": [
                        "Reversibility risk for evaluated methods and datasets",
                        "A distinction between obfuscation and robust forgetting",
                        "Need for adversarial evaluation of unlearning claims"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Failure of every unlearning method",
                        "Production-vendor deletion outcomes",
                        "Exact recovery of every target item"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Failure of every unlearning method; Production-vendor deletion outcomes; Exact recovery of every target item",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Failure of every unlearning method",
                        "Production-vendor deletion outcomes",
                        "Exact recovery of every target item"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-52-UNLEARNING-SYSTEMATIC-AUDIT-2026",
                    "title": "Auditing Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Research on Whether Existing Algorithms Truly Forget",
                    "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2606.16110v1",
                    "source_type": "ACADEMIC_PREPRINT_SYSTEMATIC_AUDIT",
                    "source_tier": "PUBLIC_PREPRINT_HTML_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "INDEPENDENT_METHODS_AND_LIMITATIONS_STUDY",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Independent academic authors",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-15",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_RESEARCH_AS_OF_2026-07-28_NOT_PEER_REVIEW_CERTIFICATION",
                    "jurisdiction": "Research — cross-jurisdictional",
                    "supports": [
                        "Unlearning auditability remains an open technical problem",
                        "Failed extraction or membership tests do not automatically prove exact forgetting",
                        "Residual information leakage must be evaluated separately from ordinary output suppression"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A universal failure of every unlearning method",
                        "Exact behavior of any named production foundation model",
                        "Legal compliance in a specific jurisdiction"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A universal failure of every unlearning method; Exact behavior of any named production foundation model; Legal compliance in a specific jurisdiction",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A universal failure of every unlearning method",
                        "Exact behavior of any named production foundation model",
                        "Legal compliance in a specific jurisdiction"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-39-NIST-AML-UNLEARNING",
                    "title": "Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations",
                    "url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-2e2025.pdf",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_GOVERNMENT_TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE",
                    "source_tier": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_GOVERNMENT_GUIDANCE",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "methods_transparency": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology",
                    "publication_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "access_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENTLY_RETRIEVED_2026-07-29",
                    "jurisdiction": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "supports": "Recognizes machine unlearning and distinguishes exact and approximate approaches.",
                    "does_not_support": "That any named production model has achieved exact audited unlearning or legal compliance.",
                    "known_blind_spot": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": "That any named production model has achieved exact audited unlearning or legal compliance."
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-40-UNLEARNING-AUDIT-2026",
                    "title": "Auditing Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Research on Whether Models Truly Forget",
                    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16110",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_RESEARCH_PREPRINT",
                    "source_tier": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_relationship": "INDEPENDENT_RESEARCH_PREPRINT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "methods_transparency": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "issuing_body": "Ye et al.",
                    "publication_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "access_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "currentness_state": "PREPRINT_RETRIEVED_2026-07-29",
                    "jurisdiction": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "supports": "Documents that auditing whether unlearning truly erases influence remains an open technical challenge and evaluates multiple methods.",
                    "does_not_support": "Peer-reviewed consensus, universal failure, or production deployment validity.",
                    "known_blind_spot": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "prohibited_inference": "Peer-reviewed consensus, universal failure, or production deployment validity."
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Deleting a source record or blocking an output does not by itself remove the record’s learned influence from model weights, embeddings, features, memories, caches, backups, or downstream recipients.",
                    "wording_sha256": "f4991458d196251f96a9c52d16dca76418f314e893860424910a8d75d683be49",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 5,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-02-unlearning-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "b470f0eade7cabae84b39627600b388a750d86da8243068a99fd7d2b60364585"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NARROWING",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, and machine unlearning are distinct interventions. Current public audits do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "bc3abebf2c96c63a295b6020879d30f01729c221315aa58465792b0f7d986fb9",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "New 2026 auditing research requires explicit separation of suppression, approximate unlearning, exact forgetting, and production validation.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-01",
                    "number": 6,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-02-unlearning-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "32981d549246b4326aa851031bf22db6b367396e67788913a7ffb9a8463bb889"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-02",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-02",
                    "number": 7,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-02-unlearning-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "e2f24d9864fdf53a3a98dfb196502a61956a71cdaa17cd83d677823351f3b52c"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-02",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-03",
                    "number": 8,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-02-unlearning-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "223f46eb462bd9c50a0b959ea99a52cd772a3353c044b4bae9387a5b18b60cf3"
                },
                {
                    "number": 54,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-02",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "223f46eb462bd9c50a0b959ea99a52cd772a3353c044b4bae9387a5b18b60cf3",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-02-unlearning-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "8b5dfb986fbd47e3188b3dcf623c584a6a2029a0631e4cb7d1d4c88334a7c4f2"
                },
                {
                    "number": 67,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-02",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "8b5dfb986fbd47e3188b3dcf623c584a6a2029a0631e4cb7d1d4c88334a7c4f2",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-02-unlearning-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "846d662ec13d4cfdcec0b4de3a807b81cabd3a9e2ce314cc1072d62dabeb6492"
                },
                {
                    "number": 80,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-02",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "846d662ec13d4cfdcec0b4de3a807b81cabd3a9e2ce314cc1072d62dabeb6492",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "73533af54b057732f4b5d87dbeaa2b78beb17426794b12b258debc276cf880f4"
                },
                {
                    "number": 93,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Source deletion, suppression, output blocking, model editing, retraining, exact unlearning, and approximate unlearning are distinct interventions. Current standards and public research do not establish that a named production foundation model has exactly removed a requested influence or reached independently audited retraining-equivalent behavior across hidden and observable pathways.",
                    "wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-02",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-02-UNLEARNING-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "73533af54b057732f4b5d87dbeaa2b78beb17426794b12b258debc276cf880f4",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "68276f0748259f644274db399fd2f54e3fdea5b981e7c18081c971807332e9b0",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-02-unlearning",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "5009fa8da3e81aec2cd672c107ac2e270a7eaf47bb97ba7b350fd42ee333706d"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "1d0c4ff355eca59ea792ffcac12308c90960cf416eb92fba3c43e58d7694b5f0",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Observed movement is not direct knowledge of emotion",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-03-mental-state",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-03-mental-state",
            "current_wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
            "record_digest_sha256": "c396b83dea65983305e959adff4639169ca7ca1be394864bfc944a007e448fef",
            "plain_language_summary": "A detected movement or signal is not direct knowledge of a person's emotion, intent, loyalty, or dangerousness.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PEER_REVIEWED_CLOSURE_SUBSTANTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Sensor and feature accuracy must be separated from label quality, construct validity, calibration, generalization, base rates, subgroup burden, and institutional action.",
            "does_not_establish": "That no behavioral or physiological signal has any predictive utility for any narrow purpose.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "Large replicated field studies establish robust construct validity for a specified system and use.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-10-BARRETT-FACIAL-MOVEMENTS",
                    "title": "Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements",
                    "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6640856/",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_SCIENTIFIC_REVIEW",
                    "source_tier": "OPEN_ACCESS_ARTICLE_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_PEER_REVIEWED_REVIEW",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Association for Psychological Science authors / Psychological Science in the Public Interest",
                    "publication_date": "2019-07-17",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "FOUNDATIONAL_REVIEW_STILL_RELEVANT",
                    "jurisdiction": "Scientific literature",
                    "supports": [
                        "Construct-validity caution for facial emotion inference",
                        "Context, culture, and individual variation"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That facial movement detection itself is impossible",
                        "That every affective-computing application has zero utility",
                        "Validity of other modalities without separate evidence"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That facial movement detection itself is impossible; That every affective-computing application has zero utility; Validity of other modalities without separate evidence",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That facial movement detection itself is impossible",
                        "That every affective-computing application has zero utility",
                        "Validity of other modalities without separate evidence"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-05-EU-AI-ACT",
                    "title": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act",
                    "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689",
                    "source_type": "ENACTED_LEGISLATION",
                    "source_tier": "PRIMARY_LEGAL_TEXT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_LEGAL_TEXT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "European Union",
                    "publication_date": "2024-07-12",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "ENACTED_WITH_PHASED_APPLICATION",
                    "jurisdiction": "European Union",
                    "supports": [
                        "Exact enacted text and jurisdictional scope",
                        "Article 5 prohibition categories and exceptions",
                        "Application schedule stated in the Regulation"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A universal cognitive-liberty code",
                        "Uniform implementation outside the EU",
                        "A scientific finding that all emotion inference is invalid"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A universal cognitive-liberty code; Uniform implementation outside the EU; A scientific finding that all emotion inference is invalid",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A universal cognitive-liberty code",
                        "Uniform implementation outside the EU",
                        "A scientific finding that all emotion inference is invalid"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-42-ACM-WORKPLACE-EMOTION-RECOGNITION",
                    "title": "Automated Emotion Recognition in the Workplace",
                    "url": "https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579528",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_SYSTEMS_AND_WORKPLACE_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PEER_REVIEWED_ANALYSIS_OF_PROPOSED_SYSTEMS",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "ACM / peer-reviewed HCI research",
                    "publication_date": "2023-01-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global / workplace technology",
                    "supports": [
                        "Documented design proposals and claimed workplace uses",
                        "The gap between sensed proxies, inferred labels, and institutional action",
                        "Privacy, labor, and validity concerns"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent construct validity for a specified deployed system",
                        "Clinical knowledge of employee emotion",
                        "Population-wide performance"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent construct validity for a specified deployed system; Clinical knowledge of employee emotion; Population-wide performance",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent construct validity for a specified deployed system",
                        "Clinical knowledge of employee emotion",
                        "Population-wide performance"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-43-ACM-JOB-INTERVIEW-EMOTION-AI",
                    "title": "Emotion AI in Job Interviews: Injustice, Emotional Labor, and Design Implications",
                    "url": "https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3715275.3732002",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_USER_STUDY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PEER_REVIEWED_AFFECTED_USER_STUDY",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "ACM / peer-reviewed HCI research",
                    "publication_date": "2025-06-23",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States / job interviews",
                    "supports": [
                        "Affected-user perceptions of procedural justice in the studied interview context",
                        "Potential emotional labor and fairness burdens"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Construct validity of the emotion score",
                        "Hiring outcome benefit or predictive validity",
                        "Generalization to every hiring system"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Construct validity of the emotion score; Hiring outcome benefit or predictive validity; Generalization to every hiring system",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Construct validity of the emotion score",
                        "Hiring outcome benefit or predictive validity",
                        "Generalization to every hiring system"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, voice feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without validly determining a person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, attention, vulnerability, or intent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "a0eb60715b9f97c8a4f55bab5268536208a4def639ceb4e71e8b0e0d94948c11",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 9,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-03-mental-state-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "eaa86c0447322b4748ba7a85324f6e8b511ddf133f1e8d8f5e8742a7764a98af"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CLARIFICATION",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Restated the distinction between signal detection and named-construct validity after the refreshed field search.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-01",
                    "number": 10,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-03-mental-state-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "b0d13be9d627345cb14bc98b70550bf3309cfe922d277717e933ecbf296d1d78"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-03",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-02",
                    "number": 11,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-03-mental-state-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "33577c72f297c8254ef45b4195b87a12b4bee3013ead18458bd32145879483c2"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-03",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-03",
                    "number": 12,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-03-mental-state-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "e77c96ea29e782a4583454fc61b05bd7854517131c963d6cffdacd88d51342a9"
                },
                {
                    "number": 55,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-03",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "e77c96ea29e782a4583454fc61b05bd7854517131c963d6cffdacd88d51342a9",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-03-mental-state-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "a1b4c459d3d2520542040e517d65f38c3b796842d8059f51b02d1c225b9b0c3e"
                },
                {
                    "number": 68,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-03",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "a1b4c459d3d2520542040e517d65f38c3b796842d8059f51b02d1c225b9b0c3e",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-03-mental-state-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "a28e23bfb2d4c0190a136173d6bd195e751388ab47eb61ee5d1bee779a2aee99"
                },
                {
                    "number": 81,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-03",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "a28e23bfb2d4c0190a136173d6bd195e751388ab47eb61ee5d1bee779a2aee99",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "0225a159c1abc99b90a6fb70a3006b4e99beaffe4b706bf1fe638d9e8a74f149"
                },
                {
                    "number": 94,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "A system may detect a facial movement, vocal feature, gaze pattern, physiological signal, or interaction trace without reliably establishing the person’s emotion, deception, loyalty, vulnerability, intent, or dangerousness. Independent construct-specific field validity remains incomplete.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-03",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-03-MENTAL-STATE-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "0225a159c1abc99b90a6fb70a3006b4e99beaffe4b706bf1fe638d9e8a74f149",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "8ab000762a883875380f4d8d7d02dd9693161799449b51a5be32c3724613d4c5",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-03-mental-state",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "5414ac0726f6d598edf4750b9fe34c3d38ead566b598a27c4eb8f1e714b2f8da"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "48422257125ec6a0a58a7d3c261d39f076fd69d1e88497e8577dc06f45fee3cd",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Cognitive-liberty law is jurisdiction-specific and uneven",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-04-law",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-04-law",
            "current_wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
            "record_digest_sha256": "031a548591dcc3118e16aa5f67feabe0710cc0f912117e06a739e83a216bfe7b",
            "plain_language_summary": "Rules about cognitive liberty, neural data, biometrics, and AI vary by jurisdiction and legal stage.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_LEGAL_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Legal status must separate proposal, enactment, entry into force, application, guidance, complaint, enforcement, settlement, judgment, amendment, repeal, and supersession.",
            "does_not_establish": "Legal advice, universal application, or uniform enforcement.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "A law is amended, repealed, corrected, or authoritatively interpreted.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-05-EU-AI-ACT",
                    "title": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act",
                    "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689",
                    "source_type": "ENACTED_LEGISLATION",
                    "source_tier": "PRIMARY_LEGAL_TEXT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_LEGAL_TEXT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "European Union",
                    "publication_date": "2024-07-12",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "ENACTED_WITH_PHASED_APPLICATION",
                    "jurisdiction": "European Union",
                    "supports": [
                        "Exact enacted text and jurisdictional scope",
                        "Article 5 prohibition categories and exceptions",
                        "Application schedule stated in the Regulation"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A universal cognitive-liberty code",
                        "Uniform implementation outside the EU",
                        "A scientific finding that all emotion inference is invalid"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A universal cognitive-liberty code; Uniform implementation outside the EU; A scientific finding that all emotion inference is invalid",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A universal cognitive-liberty code",
                        "Uniform implementation outside the EU",
                        "A scientific finding that all emotion inference is invalid"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-06-COLORADO-NEURAL-DATA",
                    "title": "Colorado HB24-1058 — Protect Privacy of Biological Data",
                    "url": "https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb24-1058",
                    "source_type": "ENACTED_STATE_LEGISLATION",
                    "source_tier": "PRIMARY_LEGISLATIVE_RECORD_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_LEGISLATIVE_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Colorado General Assembly",
                    "publication_date": "2024-04-17",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "ENACTED_STATE_LAW_AS_RECORDED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Colorado, United States",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence and official status of the Colorado measure",
                        "Jurisdiction-bounded neural-data protection"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A federal U.S. neurorights regime",
                        "Universal mental-privacy protection",
                        "How every neural-data product will be enforced"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A federal U.S. neurorights regime; Universal mental-privacy protection; How every neural-data product will be enforced",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A federal U.S. neurorights regime",
                        "Universal mental-privacy protection",
                        "How every neural-data product will be enforced"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Current protections for neural data, emotion inference, manipulation, automated decisions, and mental privacy are distributed across jurisdictions and legal instruments; no single universal cognitive-liberty code governs every system.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c7dec817644a7ab25ca69d5dc0723ac789c951391767623157dc97f03cb80f56",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 13,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-04-law-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "6a20dcff61749d5a8e9c5e10dcc9fa17b4dc60ddfc02fba9042990f00e480921"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_SUBSTANTIVE_CHANGE",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Currentness was reviewed; no universal-law conclusion was added.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-01",
                    "number": 14,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-04-law-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "95013f63726442b378f6ff779a88df51afb04702a465ea0b1d0c485892a7e484"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-04",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-02",
                    "number": 15,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-04-law-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "47957f5a9df5acbf3ce26aa8338dfc947d7a38b7d2bb07dd60f6fcbf450b649f"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-04",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-03",
                    "number": 16,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-04-law-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "8ee69e035cf18e1228f1767b62d88070dfc0c51d78ad7bd03eea3e902cea6ca9"
                },
                {
                    "number": 56,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-04",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "8ee69e035cf18e1228f1767b62d88070dfc0c51d78ad7bd03eea3e902cea6ca9",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-04-law-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "23b016c66dbb9422a6c54b6f35b2c81f87044d8b18deb8488005364cd353a15c"
                },
                {
                    "number": 69,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-04",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "23b016c66dbb9422a6c54b6f35b2c81f87044d8b18deb8488005364cd353a15c",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-04-law-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "07fa87b1ef07054d84678a51982090cef75e2bc69e2c87bc7fed3b1b974c8a79"
                },
                {
                    "number": 82,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-04",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "07fa87b1ef07054d84678a51982090cef75e2bc69e2c87bc7fed3b1b974c8a79",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-04-law",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "032c72d4b0baa29c79b54cbe9acad774a981a5f16d24c99008b89510272b0533"
                },
                {
                    "number": 95,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Cognitive-liberty, neural-data, biometric, automated-decision, and AI-manipulation rules remain jurisdiction-specific, staged, and uneven. A proposal, guidance document, settlement, trial judgment, or one jurisdiction’s enacted rule is not a universal code.",
                    "wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-04",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-04-LAW-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "032c72d4b0baa29c79b54cbe9acad774a981a5f16d24c99008b89510272b0533",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "5dd0fc5f0305048f8f836ef0a56162a6e0831bf4ebbef1065e429c55166cc3ff",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-04-law",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-04-law",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "e7117f42fb4f557eaa17da99b9429735cbb24d20ca5af00b1be84216feaa8a71"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "8f43d8ed2f9efbcd64a3640377741149333b563e6765966f0ef6647ea384446a",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Visibility actions and remedy outcomes are separate",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-05-visibility",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-05-visibility",
            "current_wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
            "record_digest_sha256": "bd1abfd33960a7d5c89bd928e664b6550053ffb579574039434cb62ecbd4215a",
            "plain_language_summary": "Restoring visible content does not by itself prove that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or copied records were repaired.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_DECISION_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "A content item can be restored without evidence that reach, recommendation, strikes, monetization, or copied signals were repaired.",
            "does_not_establish": "That every traffic decline is suppression or every ranking change is censorship.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "Platform records show that a named action or outcome was misclassified.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-03-META-OVERSIGHT-AYAHUASCA",
                    "title": "Meta Oversight Board decision: Ayahuasca brew",
                    "url": "https://www.oversightboard.com/decision/ig-0u6fla5b/",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_PLATFORM_APPEAL_DECISION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_APPELLATE_DECISION",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Meta Oversight Board",
                    "publication_date": "2021-01-28",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "DECISION_FINAL_WITHIN_BOARD_PROCESS",
                    "jurisdiction": "Platform governance — global service context",
                    "supports": [
                        "Removal and appellate reversal",
                        "Notice and rule-clarity deficiencies",
                        "Restoration ordered after appeal"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Restoration of prior reach or recommendation position",
                        "Correction of all account or ranking signals",
                        "Compensation or complete downstream repair"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Restoration of prior reach or recommendation position; Correction of all account or ranking signals; Compensation or complete downstream repair",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Restoration of prior reach or recommendation position",
                        "Correction of all account or ranking signals",
                        "Compensation or complete downstream repair"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalties, synthesized reframing, and profile changes are different interventions with different notice, evidence, appeal, restoration, and downstream effects.",
                    "wording_sha256": "df612ae922150518bc448a957d871e697a927e5becccee7c5e92455052bd5265",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 17,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-05-visibility-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "c38d47031cb349bf1603979abb62633887dc9d8202092772c1f8f86def027514"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CLARIFICATION",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Made downstream ranking, recommendation, strike, and income repair explicit.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-01",
                    "number": 18,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-05-visibility-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "d2a690f457fa27a3843578ccc21078c779a65b718f422422338a403ffa81da76"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-05",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-02",
                    "number": 19,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-05-visibility-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "eed454b99747afdd410fb9cef88abd0a2ed2fe368f19dffbf99c05bbb1126ebd"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-05",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-03",
                    "number": 20,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-05-visibility-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "2c085cd60ad578412331e09155a5c98a154cd555e1e87cc4e4295560259713ae"
                },
                {
                    "number": 57,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-05",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "2c085cd60ad578412331e09155a5c98a154cd555e1e87cc4e4295560259713ae",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-05-visibility-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "4107e70b55384f5be778af7f9cd305dcc5989947d16b0ee8e933e86ff3056776"
                },
                {
                    "number": 70,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-05",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "4107e70b55384f5be778af7f9cd305dcc5989947d16b0ee8e933e86ff3056776",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-05-visibility-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "2dcd8abba17fb92d6d26ac56ef534f6ad7a7731c08bd393c8578edb61f763a37"
                },
                {
                    "number": 83,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-05",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "2dcd8abba17fb92d6d26ac56ef534f6ad7a7731c08bd393c8578edb61f763a37",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "08aba3050f666adeba03980463e70d1bfa31fd2d9f4d7ca8123af9310a88bccb"
                },
                {
                    "number": 96,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Removal, restriction, search exclusion, recommendation exclusion, downranking, labeling, monetization change, account penalty, personalized refusal, synthesized reframing, and persistent-profile change are different actions. A visible restoration does not by itself show that ranking, recommendation, strikes, income, or downstream records were repaired.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-05",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-05-VISIBILITY-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "08aba3050f666adeba03980463e70d1bfa31fd2d9f4d7ca8123af9310a88bccb",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cb2fa8aaa0207a90deffb4195a0d359429f28c4c4ab1e2d263c987dd7f4d1a62",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-05-visibility",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "772a2e2fc178d698984720197ccee1b51b79f066f93946d51bd72526480eb736"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "0375a8c3e714edd94fa6b2b6505125d51e569d3cb1ca55ad83f6c0231e7b0b0b",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Lived experience and institutional evidence require explicit scope",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
            "current_wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
            "record_digest_sha256": "c78186cf587270371fe89f5b7bd091f4fa0e95d48732439eaacf6ea455a59ed7",
            "plain_language_summary": "First-person and affected-community evidence matters, but one account is not automatically representative of a population.",
            "evidence_maturity": "OFFICIAL_INQUIRY_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Affected-person evidence belongs in governance analysis with consent, privacy, retaliation, selection, nonresponse, and representativeness limits.",
            "does_not_establish": "Population prevalence from a case collection or an exclusive causal chain for every reported harm.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "A cited account is corrected, withdrawn, or shown to be misrepresented.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-04-ROBODEBT-ROYAL-COMMISSION",
                    "title": "Report of the Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme",
                    "url": "https://robodebt.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/report",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_INQUIRY_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_REPORT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OFFICIAL_INQUIRY",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Australian Government — Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme",
                    "publication_date": "2023-07-07",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "FINAL_REPORT_AS_PUBLISHED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Official inquiry findings and chronology",
                        "Institutional process failures",
                        "Published testimony and affected-person evidence within the inquiry record"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That every individual harm or death had one exclusive cause",
                        "That all automated public-benefit systems share the same design",
                        "A universal remedy outcome"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That every individual harm or death had one exclusive cause; That all automated public-benefit systems share the same design; A universal remedy outcome",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That every individual harm or death had one exclusive cause",
                        "That all automated public-benefit systems share the same design",
                        "A universal remedy outcome"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-35-ROBODEBT-2026-SETTLEMENT",
                    "title": "New Robodebt class action settlement",
                    "url": "https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/new-robodebt-class-action-settlement?context=60271",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_SETTLEMENT_IMPLEMENTATION_NOTICE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "OFFICIAL_NOTICE_OF_FEDERAL_COURT_APPROVED_SETTLEMENT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Services Australia / Federal Court-approved settlement information",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-26",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Settlement approval date",
                        "Additional compensation amount and relation to earlier refunds and debt zeroing",
                        "Appointment of a settlement administration process"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Individual complete repair",
                        "Correction of every downstream record or inference",
                        "A merits judgment on every disputed issue"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Individual complete repair; Correction of every downstream record or inference; A merits judgment on every disputed issue",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Individual complete repair",
                        "Correction of every downstream record or inference",
                        "A merits judgment on every disputed issue"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-36-ROBODEBT-INCOME-APPORTIONMENT-RESOLUTION",
                    "title": "Income Apportionment Resolution Scheme",
                    "url": "https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/income-apportionment-resolution-scheme?context=60271",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_REMEDY_PROGRAM_NOTICE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_REMEDY_PROGRAM_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Services Australia",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Australia — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence, eligibility pathway, and dates of the resolution scheme",
                        "A separate remedy mechanism for eligible affected people"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Take-up, accessibility, approval, or rejection rates",
                        "Complete compensation",
                        "Downstream data correction or repeat-error prevention"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Take-up, accessibility, approval, or rejection rates; Complete compensation; Downstream data correction or repeat-error prevention",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Take-up, accessibility, approval, or rejection rates",
                        "Complete compensation",
                        "Downstream data correction or repeat-error prevention"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-43-ACM-JOB-INTERVIEW-EMOTION-AI",
                    "title": "Emotion AI in Job Interviews: Injustice, Emotional Labor, and Design Implications",
                    "url": "https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3715275.3732002",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_USER_STUDY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PEER_REVIEWED_AFFECTED_USER_STUDY",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "ACM / peer-reviewed HCI research",
                    "publication_date": "2025-06-23",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States / job interviews",
                    "supports": [
                        "Affected-user perceptions of procedural justice in the studied interview context",
                        "Potential emotional labor and fairness burdens"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Construct validity of the emotion score",
                        "Hiring outcome benefit or predictive validity",
                        "Generalization to every hiring system"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Construct validity of the emotion score; Hiring outcome benefit or predictive validity; Generalization to every hiring system",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Construct validity of the emotion score",
                        "Hiring outcome benefit or predictive validity",
                        "Generalization to every hiring system"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Attributed first-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document serious algorithmic harms, but none should be treated as automatically representative of every affected person or as proof of one exclusive causal mechanism.",
                    "wording_sha256": "24653f661cd21a1634aa0d9fa21ae0ffc548df7237a16e6b62b48fc7c5822665",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 21,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-06-affected-evidence-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "f87165e1281b88b8bb7ab913b841350ac1c489633027d50cdd8713b8a0746c6d"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_SUBSTANTIVE_CHANGE",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Evidence-type and representativeness boundaries remain unchanged.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-01",
                    "number": 22,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-06-affected-evidence-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "001a0c8e32b1e5027b5db6448e618aa2926ee823fd30923deee257aa3d48b0d4"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-06",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-02",
                    "number": 23,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-06-affected-evidence-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "dac9eef03c73e4bca67c4351f7ff642a55edd43774404b81a721b5cf44d28146"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-06",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-03",
                    "number": 24,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-06-affected-evidence-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "f03d1633d726beceea96b4633f6fb00d765d34f3f8cd6342d8a3b9a7af8f8da4"
                },
                {
                    "number": 58,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-06",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "f03d1633d726beceea96b4633f6fb00d765d34f3f8cd6342d8a3b9a7af8f8da4",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-06-affected-evidence-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "c05653b87a0ce50424bdaabcb1b75925c6d6a082f036eec32d831c6b69bd60c6"
                },
                {
                    "number": 71,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-06",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "c05653b87a0ce50424bdaabcb1b75925c6d6a082f036eec32d831c6b69bd60c6",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-06-affected-evidence-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "73e5d9c332050ba4d7d6888c711ac0b91f3cc6c27923f5f60bbd7d1a046ae12a"
                },
                {
                    "number": 84,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-06",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "73e5d9c332050ba4d7d6888c711ac0b91f3cc6c27923f5f60bbd7d1a046ae12a",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "ab9d551d08364dc881f1c872414dba65061c3c9c2a259702e1cac7e179df8a1d"
                },
                {
                    "number": 97,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "First-person, representative, institutional, aggregated, anonymized, and derivative evidence can document different parts of an AI-governance harm. None should be silently converted into prevalence, universal causation, representativeness, or affected-community endorsement.",
                    "wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-06",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-06-AFFECTED-EVIDENCE-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "ab9d551d08364dc881f1c872414dba65061c3c9c2a259702e1cac7e179df8a1d",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "d55f61ab535195e1e73271068dc0c61a0ccccd02000ea63ee3054b4edf71e2e8",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-06-affected-evidence",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "7b379da8c8b996a601b26bc575b2ec0f8d62429fef05368371f6c680f1ec9196"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "e114a667d701f4a714949a83b54a7f381384bce5f13632be4ab30ccca509e490",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Regulatory inquiry is not clinical causality",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-07-companion-safety",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
            "current_wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
            "record_digest_sha256": "82916f3a3e204f2126363a030e1a7b15e9fefecb2c113a7d2aa36712e2f24539",
            "plain_language_summary": "A regulatory inquiry records concern and information gathering; it does not by itself prove clinical causation or wrongdoing.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_REGULATORY_CLOSURE_LIMITED",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Companion-system safety requires product-design, age, disclosure, data, engagement, crisis, and dependency review.",
            "does_not_establish": "Prevalence, diagnosis, causation, negligence, or liability.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "FTC publishes findings or corrects the inquiry scope.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-01-FTC-COMPANION-INQUIRY",
                    "title": "FTC inquiry into AI chatbots acting as companions",
                    "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/09/ftc-launches-inquiry-ai-chatbots-acting-companions",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_REGULATORY_INQUIRY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_ISSUING_BODY_NOTICE",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Federal Trade Commission",
                    "publication_date": "2025-09-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence and scope of the FTC inquiry",
                        "The companies and issue areas named by the FTC",
                        "Regulatory concern requiring further information"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A completed enforcement finding",
                        "Clinical causation",
                        "Product-specific liability or prevalence of harm"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A completed enforcement finding; Clinical causation; Product-specific liability or prevalence of harm",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A completed enforcement finding",
                        "Clinical causation",
                        "Product-specific liability or prevalence of harm"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-33-FTC-2026-COMPANION-REMARKS",
                    "title": "Prepared remarks describing the FTC companion-chatbot 6(b) inquiry",
                    "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2026-3-12-Mufarrige-Remarks-for-Venable-Ad-Law-Symposium.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CURRENTNESS_STATEMENT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "CURRENT_OFFICIAL_STATEMENT_REFERENCING_OPEN_INQUIRY",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Federal Trade Commission — Bureau of Consumer Protection",
                    "publication_date": "2026-03-12",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "The inquiry remained an active information-gathering matter in March 2026",
                        "The seven-company scope and subject areas"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Public findings, final enforcement, settlement, or closure",
                        "Product-specific wrongdoing",
                        "Clinical causality"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Public findings, final enforcement, settlement, or closure; Product-specific wrongdoing; Clinical causality",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Public findings, final enforcement, settlement, or closure",
                        "Product-specific wrongdoing",
                        "Clinical causality"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-49-FTC-2026-OVERSIGHT-TESTIMONY",
                    "title": "Federal Trade Commission oversight testimony describing the companion-chatbot 6(b) study",
                    "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p994811-ftc-oversight-testimony-senate-commerce-committee-2026.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CONGRESSIONAL_TESTIMONY",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_AGENCY_CURRENTNESS_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Federal Trade Commission",
                    "publication_date": "2026-04-15",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENTNESS_SUPPLEMENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "The inquiry remained part of the FTC’s publicly described work in April 2026",
                        "The inquiry is a study rather than a completed enforcement finding",
                        "The agency continued to describe the study’s child- and teen-safety scope"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A public final report, closure, settlement, or enforcement disposition",
                        "Product-specific wrongdoing or clinical causation",
                        "The contents of confidential company responses"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A public final report, closure, settlement, or enforcement disposition; Product-specific wrongdoing or clinical causation; The contents of confidential company responses",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A public final report, closure, settlement, or enforcement disposition",
                        "Product-specific wrongdoing or clinical causation",
                        "The contents of confidential company responses"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot inquiry establishes an official demand for information about safety, children and teens, disclosures, monetization, and data practices; it is not a completed finding that any product caused a psychiatric condition.",
                    "wording_sha256": "e4c43349c2e0f201beec4751b7204753f6e8ef51fbf6e114a9090ef9dd312152",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 25,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-07-companion-safety-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "e7f58e429cc46952335138e34251507e22d9efa445d16ae157900361ef9817a1"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "SOURCE_ADDITION",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Added April 2026 FTC testimony confirming the study remained ongoing without public findings.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-01",
                    "number": 26,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-07-companion-safety-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "f9eb40973f61b9dc0375945cce2399c6eaeee0f529786c2a6ac72b7356542340"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-07",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-02",
                    "number": 27,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-07-companion-safety-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "92fdf7ef5e4948581c615407e52441ccc1ac0628d1bb0b58c77e15ebf7132a1e"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-07",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-03",
                    "number": 28,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-07-companion-safety-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "fe057d57c43f5f60d52d321711df8e483a17dfa7a8507284f55e21b1a4846da8"
                },
                {
                    "number": 59,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-07",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "fe057d57c43f5f60d52d321711df8e483a17dfa7a8507284f55e21b1a4846da8",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-07-companion-safety-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "e0e9eb80f9aa6316a2797c1831c9b21dced8e6191d9711398308654ed09ca3bf"
                },
                {
                    "number": 72,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-07",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "e0e9eb80f9aa6316a2797c1831c9b21dced8e6191d9711398308654ed09ca3bf",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-07-companion-safety-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "8984193d4234edbd5e0e1a8c3df333e0c02c8a4a98d4054fca2e311142e97b65"
                },
                {
                    "number": 85,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-07",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "8984193d4234edbd5e0e1a8c3df333e0c02c8a4a98d4054fca2e311142e97b65",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "a7a159b23c782bda75ef8d92a468c00586efdc6116b7310ae0bbab541877044b"
                },
                {
                    "number": 98,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "The FTC’s companion-chatbot work remained publicly described as an ongoing Section 6(b) study in April 2026. An inquiry documents regulatory concern and information gathering; it is not a completed finding of wrongdoing, clinical causation, or prevalence.",
                    "wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-07",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-07-COMPANION-SAFETY-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "a7a159b23c782bda75ef8d92a468c00586efdc6116b7310ae0bbab541877044b",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "1b3e56c698a1acdaa35491f0f6ef35f715176c8bee093dea594ca69b6f5f0209",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-07-companion-safety",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "6309672e8c0a83f88070e2c03e23a5735a76119510c9e6d5bc8299d91f8491ae"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "4b4165b056dbefa6f4232bcfa91b496ead1fda2a331fb46aabc4c7225ec28b34",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "An incident record does not automatically prove behavioral effect",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-08-incident-effect",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
            "current_wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
            "record_digest_sha256": "eebdb383aa648e743cf2a9824777db77fb80976ff43dcfb4a41c9f68c2437034",
            "plain_language_summary": "Proving that an incident occurred is not the same as proving exposure, persuasion, behavior change, or strategic effect.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_AUTHORITY_CLOSURE_SUBSTANTIAL_FOR_INCIDENT",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Incident analysis must separate existence, content, coordination, identity, sponsorship, intent, output, distribution, availability, reach, exposure, attention, recall, comprehension, credibility, belief, intention, behavior, operational outcome, and strategic effect.",
            "does_not_establish": "Recipient belief, turnout change, electoral outcome, or broad AI persuasion effectiveness.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "FCC or a court changes the operator, scope, or final disposition.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-02-FCC-BIDEN-ROBOCALL-FINE",
                    "title": "FCC final action concerning AI-generated Biden robocalls",
                    "url": "https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-405811A1.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_FINAL_ENFORCEMENT_NOTICE",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_ISSUING_BODY_FINAL_ACTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Federal Communications Commission",
                    "publication_date": "2024-09-26",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "FINAL_AGENCY_ACTION_AS_RECORDED",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Artifact and distribution channel existence",
                        "Named operator in the FCC action",
                        "Spoofing and robocall enforcement disposition"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "How many recipients believed the call",
                        "Any measurable change in voting behavior",
                        "Broader strategic election effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "How many recipients believed the call; Any measurable change in voting behavior; Broader strategic election effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "How many recipients believed the call",
                        "Any measurable change in voting behavior",
                        "Broader strategic election effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-19-OPENAI-COVERT-IO",
                    "title": "Disrupting deceptive uses of AI by covert influence operations",
                    "url": "https://openai.com/index/disrupting-deceptive-uses-of-ai-by-covert-influence-operations/",
                    "source_type": "PLATFORM_THREAT_INTELLIGENCE_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "PROVIDER_REPORT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_PROVIDER_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "OpenAI",
                    "publication_date": "2024-05-30",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_2024_REPORT",
                    "jurisdiction": "Platform threat reporting",
                    "supports": [
                        "Provider-observed misuse patterns and disruptions",
                        "Bounded lack of observed reach/engagement uplift in provider data"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "No exposure or effect anywhere",
                        "No off-platform activity",
                        "Independent attribution beyond provider evidence"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "No exposure or effect anywhere; No off-platform activity; Independent attribution beyond provider evidence",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "No exposure or effect anywhere",
                        "No off-platform activity",
                        "Independent attribution beyond provider evidence"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-34-FCC-2025-ROBOCALL-CONGRESS-REPORT",
                    "title": "FCC report to Congress on robocall enforcement",
                    "url": "https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-1100A1.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ENFORCEMENT_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_AGENCY_REPORT_TO_CONGRESS",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Federal Communications Commission",
                    "publication_date": "2025-12-23",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Final FCC forfeiture order status",
                        "The agency’s 2024 enforcement and collection reporting context"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Payment, collection, modification, or judicial disposition after the period covered",
                        "Voter behavior or election outcome effects",
                        "State-level proceedings not described in the report"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Payment, collection, modification, or judicial disposition after the period covered; Voter behavior or election outcome effects; State-level proceedings not described in the report",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Payment, collection, modification, or judicial disposition after the period covered",
                        "Voter behavior or election outcome effects",
                        "State-level proceedings not described in the report"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-44-UKRAINE-DFRLAB-ZELENSKYY",
                    "title": "Russian War Report: hacked news program and Zelenskyy surrender deepfake",
                    "url": "https://dfrlab.org/2022/03/16/russian-war-report-hacked-news-program-and-deepfake-video-spread-false-zelenskyy-claims/",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_OPEN_SOURCE_INCIDENT_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "INDEPENDENT_OSINT_INCIDENT_DOCUMENTATION",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Digital Forensic Research Lab",
                    "publication_date": "2022-03-16",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Ukraine / Russia information environment",
                    "supports": [
                        "Artifact existence, distribution channels, and rapid public debunking",
                        "Observed ridicule and some contrary interpretations in online comments"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Representative recipient exposure or belief",
                        "Frontline disruption",
                        "Operator identity, sponsorship chain, behavior change, or strategic effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Representative recipient exposure or belief; Frontline disruption; Operator identity, sponsorship chain, behavior change, or strategic effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Representative recipient exposure or belief",
                        "Frontline disruption",
                        "Operator identity, sponsorship chain, behavior change, or strategic effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-50-FCC-FY2024-FINANCIAL-REPORT",
                    "title": "FCC Agency Financial Report recording referral of the Steve Kramer forfeiture to DOJ for collection",
                    "url": "https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-408995A1.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_AGENCY_FINANCIAL_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_AGENCY_POST_ORDER_STATUS_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Federal Communications Commission",
                    "publication_date": "2024-11-15",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "POST_ORDER_REFERRAL_RECORDED_COLLECTION_NOT_RETRIEVED",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal",
                    "supports": [
                        "Post-order referral to DOJ for collection",
                        "Continued agency treatment of the action as an enforcement matter",
                        "A distinction between the forfeiture order and actual collection"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Payment, collection, settlement, or a judicial judgment collecting the forfeiture",
                        "Recipient belief or voting behavior",
                        "A final state-law disposition for every related proceeding"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Payment, collection, settlement, or a judicial judgment collecting the forfeiture; Recipient belief or voting behavior; A final state-law disposition for every related proceeding",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Payment, collection, settlement, or a judicial judgment collecting the forfeiture",
                        "Recipient belief or voting behavior",
                        "A final state-law disposition for every related proceeding"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "actor_identity_status": "PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "intent_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "output_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "distribution_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "availability_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "reach_status": "PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "attention_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "recall_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "intention_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "The New Hampshire Biden robocall is documented as an AI-generated impersonation, spoofed distribution event, and enforcement matter; the available authority does not establish how many recipients believed it or whether voting behavior changed.",
                    "wording_sha256": "7fe903cf6f72e7abac78b6221aa01a4ab657b4eddce49b0edffe6ba77fe92ca9",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 29,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-08-incident-effect-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "957f3e2e4ad6da8063235f4fc0807a09691b2a3d2e310aae97ae16178d8a3f97"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_SUBSTANTIVE_CHANGE",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "The complete effect chain remains the controlling interpretation.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-01",
                    "number": 30,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-08-incident-effect-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "4db290bda30b8e00f21e872e9ce35236bcf426dfe513be9cf9869969cf8a02dc"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-08",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-02",
                    "number": 31,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-08-incident-effect-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "d79b4495f462980b21758f46bab83160a33219aa7cad9086664351dde4d69752"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-08",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-03",
                    "number": 32,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-08-incident-effect-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "1621261a962fcce1a6259b96c8d535fdaf58b43d095b2a4b6655487ff69de192"
                },
                {
                    "number": 60,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-08",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "1621261a962fcce1a6259b96c8d535fdaf58b43d095b2a4b6655487ff69de192",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-08-incident-effect-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "160cbdde2a17ce00715293135973ba9c75f240f73942c9229ee291ac324a8e70"
                },
                {
                    "number": 73,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-08",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "160cbdde2a17ce00715293135973ba9c75f240f73942c9229ee291ac324a8e70",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-08-incident-effect-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "609a279be17d083bf51e57536f130117b5e226b5f13b4e76ea6ab5f9c00da028"
                },
                {
                    "number": 86,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-08",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "609a279be17d083bf51e57536f130117b5e226b5f13b4e76ea6ab5f9c00da028",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "e2407f95581fa54e13d9ea8d8fde4e5fdd8a4f6c76bc707f69d663242c2a9a30"
                },
                {
                    "number": 99,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "A verified artifact, coordinated distribution, operator record, or enforcement action can establish an incident without proving recipient exposure, belief, intention, behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-08",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-08-INCIDENT-EFFECT-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "e2407f95581fa54e13d9ea8d8fde4e5fdd8a4f6c76bc707f69d663242c2a9a30",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cacb10c7d46a7b62e06cb46edf7c9dde9873ed6857acad9a22f96a055dd7253e",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-08-incident-effect",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "09be4f446cfb2d0ea36b3ac8be524f8bddc882b9317ea07353ccaf596711039d"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "62696e3d30c43e37eac910f56ff83663217d3ef195443991988a990dafe86290",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Behavioral coordination evidence is stronger than a synthetic-content score alone",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
            "current_wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
            "record_digest_sha256": "de44dc67bc445f54a5097c436db07c77ba60717d3c1bea55518d6be9cc6d5994",
            "plain_language_summary": "Coordination is better supported by behavior and infrastructure evidence than by an AI-content score alone.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_PLATFORM_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Content generation, coordination, actor identity, sponsorship, intent, and effect are separate claims.",
            "does_not_establish": "That pseudonymous users, non-native writers, activists, role-players, or neurodivergent users are bots because of linguistic style or imagery.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "A platform retracts or materially changes a network attribution.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-18-META-CIB-2022",
                    "title": "Meta 2022 coordinated inauthentic behavior enforcement report",
                    "url": "https://about.fb.com/news/2022/12/metas-2022-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-enforcements/",
                    "source_type": "PLATFORM_THREAT_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "PLATFORM_REPORT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_PLATFORM_ENFORCEMENT_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Meta",
                    "publication_date": "2022-12-15",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_2022_REPORT",
                    "jurisdiction": "Platform threat reporting",
                    "supports": [
                        "Platform-observed use of synthetic profile imagery",
                        "Behavior-centered CIB detection principle"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "State sponsorship from an image alone",
                        "AI authorship of all content",
                        "Audience persuasion or strategic effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "State sponsorship from an image alone; AI authorship of all content; Audience persuasion or strategic effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "State sponsorship from an image alone",
                        "AI authorship of all content",
                        "Audience persuasion or strategic effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-19-OPENAI-COVERT-IO",
                    "title": "Disrupting deceptive uses of AI by covert influence operations",
                    "url": "https://openai.com/index/disrupting-deceptive-uses-of-ai-by-covert-influence-operations/",
                    "source_type": "PLATFORM_THREAT_INTELLIGENCE_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "PROVIDER_REPORT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_PROVIDER_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "OpenAI",
                    "publication_date": "2024-05-30",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_2024_REPORT",
                    "jurisdiction": "Platform threat reporting",
                    "supports": [
                        "Provider-observed misuse patterns and disruptions",
                        "Bounded lack of observed reach/engagement uplift in provider data"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "No exposure or effect anywhere",
                        "No off-platform activity",
                        "Independent attribution beyond provider evidence"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "No exposure or effect anywhere; No off-platform activity; Independent attribution beyond provider evidence",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "No exposure or effect anywhere",
                        "No off-platform activity",
                        "Independent attribution beyond provider evidence"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-46-VIGINUM-ACTIVITY-2024",
                    "title": "VIGINUM 2024 activity report",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/VIGINUM_rapport_activit%C3%A9_24_vd.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ACTIVITY_AND_GOVERNANCE_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_TRANSPARENCY_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "VIGINUM / Secretariat-General for National Defence and Security",
                    "publication_date": "2025-12-30",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "Published mandate and data-governance controls",
                        "Publicly stated minimization, retention, and oversight mechanisms",
                        "Operational activity described by the institution"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent false-positive rate",
                        "Incident-level appeals or correction outcomes",
                        "Affected-community experience"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent false-positive rate; Incident-level appeals or correction outcomes; Affected-community experience",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent false-positive rate",
                        "Incident-level appeals or correction outcomes",
                        "Affected-community experience"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-48-VIGINUM-MUNICIPAL-2026",
                    "title": "Protection of public debate during the March 2026 municipal elections",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/viginum/Publications/20260611_SGDSN_VIGINUM_Rapport-public_Elections-municipales.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ELECTION_PERIOD_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_ELECTION_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "VIGINUM / election coordination network",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "Four operations reported by VIGINUM for the election period",
                        "Public reporting and threat-characterization workflow",
                        "Institutional attribution confidence as stated in the report"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent verification of every attribution",
                        "False-positive, appeal, or correction outcomes",
                        "Voter belief or behavior change"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent verification of every attribution; False-positive, appeal, or correction outcomes; Voter belief or behavior change",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent verification of every attribution",
                        "False-positive, appeal, or correction outcomes",
                        "Voter belief or behavior change"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "intent_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "output_status": "PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "attention_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "recall_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "intention_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Synthetic profile imagery or an AI-content detector score can be one clue, but coordinated inauthentic behavior should be assessed through network, chronology, infrastructure, role, and platform-enforcement evidence; a generated face alone does not identify a sponsor or prove effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "f4749b3df5315a4f31d23a51d160f335503e6ea87bc00b87c8a3016f23ace8d4",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 33,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-09-swarm-detection-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "4116df19888664af33330167301c1fdf8f666cc8ed83b59b97b9d5bac9cd8eb4"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CLARIFICATION",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Separated coordination evidence from synthetic-origin and sponsor attribution.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-01",
                    "number": 34,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-09-swarm-detection-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "3819423944fcdc1ba542ad8ca603024e37e4929a9518317137aa0d883ce8233f"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-09",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-02",
                    "number": 35,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-09-swarm-detection-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "93ef4cbdfca650fdbed9c1f04226852e70dd83a649f5a4d331b36fe8318c67c0"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-09",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-03",
                    "number": 36,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-09-swarm-detection-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "aee5119fe1ac30b9c43d97a580d1fd2472426f28ab4ce63fd8982d15c10a8644"
                },
                {
                    "number": 61,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-09",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "aee5119fe1ac30b9c43d97a580d1fd2472426f28ab4ce63fd8982d15c10a8644",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-09-swarm-detection-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "cd449032ef6cfec25a68b5c74d3b68002d104fb5cea5be88f7de44c366762b4a"
                },
                {
                    "number": 74,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-09",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "cd449032ef6cfec25a68b5c74d3b68002d104fb5cea5be88f7de44c366762b4a",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-09-swarm-detection-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "1271514b9c1223690a6403ea173971f586d131c45515ca89e1a623297b7db48b"
                },
                {
                    "number": 87,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-09",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "1271514b9c1223690a6403ea173971f586d131c45515ca89e1a623297b7db48b",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "c53754023dd0103d68e8585da7f44a49f7971c594e15b89cc44a1ece04188785"
                },
                {
                    "number": 100,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Behavioral and infrastructure evidence can establish coordination more strongly than an AI-content score alone. Coordination still does not automatically establish actor identity, sponsorship, intent, audience effect, or the synthetic origin of every asset.",
                    "wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-09",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-09-SWARM-DETECTION-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "c53754023dd0103d68e8585da7f44a49f7971c594e15b89cc44a1ece04188785",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "de23adfd1d91b4cfdee1ae7c5a218092e6fc9f43ad5c2224076dbe99a14514b6",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-09-swarm-detection",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "c11fc688db922b422f1557d3584b96c9d2aebbdf2a8350c6246c06d353f1a287"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "c2eef660795a5be5516c10c970bd44348c5882b1eea34ca86ba319da80ae905b",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Official debunking closes some stages, not all effects",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
            "current_wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
            "record_digest_sha256": "6871c474e4386673e5fc95904c90d9477e3426b0ee2cc44d2ee1ef76bee87307",
            "plain_language_summary": "A verified deepfake and rapid debunk establish an incident and response, not representative audience belief or operational effect.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_INCIDENT_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Rapid live confirmation, official channels, redundancy, platform response, and correction archives are distinct crisis controls.",
            "does_not_establish": "Precise origin, continuing belief, behavior change, operational disruption, or strategic effect.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "The issuing body or stronger forensic evidence changes chronology or attribution.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-22-UKRAINE-CPD-DEEPFAKES",
                    "title": "Analytical report on AI-generated videos used to discredit Ukraine’s Defence Forces",
                    "url": "https://cpd.gov.ua/en/report/analytical-report-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-generated-videos-to-discredit-the-defence-forces-of-ukraine/",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_INCIDENT_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_REPORT_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_TARGETED_STATE_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Center for Countering Disinformation, National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine",
                    "publication_date": "2024-02-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_INCIDENT_REPORT",
                    "jurisdiction": "Ukraine",
                    "supports": [
                        "Artifact existence and official response",
                        "Incident chronology and targeted institution’s assessment"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Precise operator identity for every artifact",
                        "Continuing audience belief",
                        "Measured operational or strategic effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Precise operator identity for every artifact; Continuing audience belief; Measured operational or strategic effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Precise operator identity for every artifact",
                        "Continuing audience belief",
                        "Measured operational or strategic effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-07-C2PA-SPEC-2-4",
                    "title": "C2PA Technical Specification 2.4",
                    "url": "https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.4/specs/C2PA_Specification.html",
                    "source_type": "TECHNICAL_STANDARD",
                    "source_tier": "PRIMARY_STANDARD_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_STANDARD_TEXT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity",
                    "publication_date": "2025-11-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "VERSION_2_4_AS_ACCESSED",
                    "jurisdiction": "International technical standard",
                    "supports": [
                        "How C2PA provenance records are structured",
                        "Cryptographic verification of signed provenance claims"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Truth of the depicted event",
                        "That unsigned media is fake",
                        "That credentials survive every transformation or platform"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Truth of the depicted event; That unsigned media is fake; That credentials survive every transformation or platform",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Truth of the depicted event",
                        "That unsigned media is fake",
                        "That credentials survive every transformation or platform"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-38-C2PA-NSA-GUIDANCE",
                    "title": "Strengthening Multimedia Integrity in the Generative AI Era",
                    "url": "https://media.defense.gov/2025/Jan/29/2003634788/-1/-1/0/CSI-CONTENT-CREDENTIALS.PDF",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CYBERSECURITY_GUIDANCE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "MULTI_AGENCY_TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "NSA, CISA, FBI, and international cybersecurity partners",
                    "publication_date": "2025-01-16",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "International cybersecurity guidance",
                    "supports": [
                        "Layered provenance architecture and operational deployment guidance",
                        "The need to combine metadata with watermarking and fingerprinting to improve resilience",
                        "Provenance supports claims about origin and history, not truth of depicted events"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent real-world survival rates across all platforms",
                        "Universal adoption",
                        "Proof that unsigned media is false"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent real-world survival rates across all platforms; Universal adoption; Proof that unsigned media is false",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent real-world survival rates across all platforms",
                        "Universal adoption",
                        "Proof that unsigned media is false"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-44-UKRAINE-DFRLAB-ZELENSKYY",
                    "title": "Russian War Report: hacked news program and Zelenskyy surrender deepfake",
                    "url": "https://dfrlab.org/2022/03/16/russian-war-report-hacked-news-program-and-deepfake-video-spread-false-zelenskyy-claims/",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_OPEN_SOURCE_INCIDENT_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "INDEPENDENT_OSINT_INCIDENT_DOCUMENTATION",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Digital Forensic Research Lab",
                    "publication_date": "2022-03-16",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Ukraine / Russia information environment",
                    "supports": [
                        "Artifact existence, distribution channels, and rapid public debunking",
                        "Observed ridicule and some contrary interpretations in online comments"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Representative recipient exposure or belief",
                        "Frontline disruption",
                        "Operator identity, sponsorship chain, behavior change, or strategic effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Representative recipient exposure or belief; Frontline disruption; Operator identity, sponsorship chain, behavior change, or strategic effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Representative recipient exposure or belief",
                        "Frontline disruption",
                        "Operator identity, sponsorship chain, behavior change, or strategic effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-45-UKRAINE-PLOS-DEEPFAKE-TRUST",
                    "title": "Do deepfake videos undermine our epistemic trust?",
                    "url": "https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291668",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_SOCIAL_MEDIA_DISCOURSE_STUDY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PEER_REVIEWED_THEMATIC_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "PLOS ONE",
                    "publication_date": "2023-10-25",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global Twitter discourse concerning the Russo-Ukrainian war",
                    "supports": [
                        "Evidence of online discourse and epistemic skepticism",
                        "Practical examples of liar’s-dividend-like claims in a social-media sample"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Representative population belief",
                        "Causal behavior change",
                        "Frontline operational effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Representative population belief; Causal behavior change; Frontline operational effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Representative population belief",
                        "Causal behavior change",
                        "Frontline operational effect"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "intent_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "output_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "distribution_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "availability_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "reach_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "attention_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "recall_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "intention_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Official Ukrainian records document the Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and later Zaluzhnyi deepfakes and describe rapid detection and debunking; they do not quantify continuing belief, troop-level exposure, operator identity for every artifact, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "56a0695e448e5dcfd769b141a45614249998d1368711f215263b09ac630d25a7",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 37,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-10-deepfake-response-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "d9ca59df8e7ebbf7060be5286e84fd393c4deeb3c7851edab886e2b79b747901"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NARROWING",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Removed any implication that ridicule or rapid debunking established recipient belief or operational effect.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-01",
                    "number": 38,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-10-deepfake-response-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "faa5ef9451b72f6280eb2cb808a5e76910493257353d388db685dcaf429ea7c2"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-10",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-02",
                    "number": 39,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-10-deepfake-response-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "907e63dbcf3286aef8ac86b10e20081fed9da4971c449c6e56978d06a2d790ad"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-10",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-03",
                    "number": 40,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-10-deepfake-response-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "c894c0513c71c9015be22425704c5c10eb4d354bb2fd8c8c2edec002830aae01"
                },
                {
                    "number": 62,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-10",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "c894c0513c71c9015be22425704c5c10eb4d354bb2fd8c8c2edec002830aae01",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-10-deepfake-response-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "bb4d5727496c8981a5f18656370b221f27a740c6e114c795e9da9ab57b4226fd"
                },
                {
                    "number": 75,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-10",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "bb4d5727496c8981a5f18656370b221f27a740c6e114c795e9da9ab57b4226fd",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-10-deepfake-response-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "f4566797b50bc21ea8702854fcad089591163d29482b98cc019b35e3643dbfce"
                },
                {
                    "number": 88,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-10",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "f4566797b50bc21ea8702854fcad089591163d29482b98cc019b35e3643dbfce",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "41ebacc04752cb5c4a07d86a7326438b49d98c6d5d79cfe63d8c120964a06e1b"
                },
                {
                    "number": 101,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "The Zelenskyy surrender deepfake and rapid rebuttal establish the artifact, hacked distribution, and authentication response. Public sources reviewed here do not establish representative recipient belief, frontline behavior change, operational outcome, or strategic effect.",
                    "wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-10",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-10-DEEPFAKE-RESPONSE-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "41ebacc04752cb5c4a07d86a7326438b49d98c6d5d79cfe63d8c120964a06e1b",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "569cca2f52b0142fd96622e11cb125bb20feb5271bd46b80b1861108bf1bc6c2",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-10-deepfake-response",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "6e9bc43e22e163afeae918ae3414b8b626b39237045546f0d8e62a5ff66bf60f"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "2b2fd05c2caa5fdd67a49cac4675f32890d51f22e632f3ce310abf6320645011",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Provenance is not truth, and the liar’s dividend is context-dependent",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
            "current_wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
            "record_digest_sha256": "150f1f831a3a688b7ad91326babae517a8c964f51c1e6985a40034625898b72e",
            "plain_language_summary": "Signed provenance can support authenticity claims, but it does not prove truth and its absence does not prove falsehood.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_STANDARD_PLUS_PEER_REVIEWED_CLOSURE_SUBSTANTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Authentication should combine provenance, source confirmation, live interaction, reverse search, forensics, channel redundancy, correction archives, and uncertainty disclosure.",
            "does_not_establish": "That provenance guarantees truth or that deepfake denial always succeeds.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "C2PA or the journal corrects the relevant records.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-07-C2PA-SPEC-2-4",
                    "title": "C2PA Technical Specification 2.4",
                    "url": "https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.4/specs/C2PA_Specification.html",
                    "source_type": "TECHNICAL_STANDARD",
                    "source_tier": "PRIMARY_STANDARD_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_STANDARD_TEXT",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity",
                    "publication_date": "2025-11-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "VERSION_2_4_AS_ACCESSED",
                    "jurisdiction": "International technical standard",
                    "supports": [
                        "How C2PA provenance records are structured",
                        "Cryptographic verification of signed provenance claims"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Truth of the depicted event",
                        "That unsigned media is fake",
                        "That credentials survive every transformation or platform"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Truth of the depicted event; That unsigned media is fake; That credentials survive every transformation or platform",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Truth of the depicted event",
                        "That unsigned media is fake",
                        "That credentials survive every transformation or platform"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-20-LIARS-DIVIDEND-APSR",
                    "title": "The Liar’s Dividend: Can Politicians Claim Misinformation to Evade Accountability?",
                    "url": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/liars-dividend-can-politicians-claim-misinformation-to-evade-accountability/687FEE54DBD7ED0C96D72B26606AA073",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_EXPERIMENTAL_RESEARCH",
                    "source_tier": "PEER_REVIEWED_ARTICLE_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_PEER_REVIEWED_EXPERIMENTS",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "American Political Science Review authors",
                    "publication_date": "2023-10-10",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "PUBLISHED_EXPERIMENTAL_EVIDENCE",
                    "jurisdiction": "Research literature",
                    "supports": [
                        "The liar’s dividend as a measurable but format- and context-dependent phenomenon",
                        "Experimental evidence against treating denial as uniformly effective"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Effect in every country or crisis",
                        "Long-term behavior change",
                        "Effectiveness against every media format"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Effect in every country or crisis; Long-term behavior change; Effectiveness against every media format",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Effect in every country or crisis",
                        "Long-term behavior change",
                        "Effectiveness against every media format"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-38-C2PA-NSA-GUIDANCE",
                    "title": "Strengthening Multimedia Integrity in the Generative AI Era",
                    "url": "https://media.defense.gov/2025/Jan/29/2003634788/-1/-1/0/CSI-CONTENT-CREDENTIALS.PDF",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CYBERSECURITY_GUIDANCE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "MULTI_AGENCY_TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "NSA, CISA, FBI, and international cybersecurity partners",
                    "publication_date": "2025-01-16",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "International cybersecurity guidance",
                    "supports": [
                        "Layered provenance architecture and operational deployment guidance",
                        "The need to combine metadata with watermarking and fingerprinting to improve resilience",
                        "Provenance supports claims about origin and history, not truth of depicted events"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent real-world survival rates across all platforms",
                        "Universal adoption",
                        "Proof that unsigned media is false"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent real-world survival rates across all platforms; Universal adoption; Proof that unsigned media is false",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent real-world survival rates across all platforms",
                        "Universal adoption",
                        "Proof that unsigned media is false"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-39-C2PA-INDEPENDENT-FORMAL-ANALYSIS",
                    "title": "Verifying Provenance of Digital Media: Why the C2PA Security Model Is Not Yet Ready for High-Stakes Use",
                    "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2604.24890v1",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_FORMAL_SECURITY_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "INDEPENDENT_FORMAL_METHODS_RESEARCH",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Independent academic researchers",
                    "publication_date": "2026-04-23",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "PREPRINT_CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global technical standard",
                    "supports": [
                        "Documented independent criticism and identified protocol-level risks",
                        "The need for high-stakes caution and complementary verification"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That every C2PA implementation fails",
                        "Field prevalence of each vulnerability",
                        "A final standards-body disposition"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That every C2PA implementation fails; Field prevalence of each vulnerability; A final standards-body disposition",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That every C2PA implementation fails",
                        "Field prevalence of each vulnerability",
                        "A final standards-body disposition"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-45-UKRAINE-PLOS-DEEPFAKE-TRUST",
                    "title": "Do deepfake videos undermine our epistemic trust?",
                    "url": "https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291668",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_SOCIAL_MEDIA_DISCOURSE_STUDY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PEER_REVIEWED_THEMATIC_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "PLOS ONE",
                    "publication_date": "2023-10-25",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global Twitter discourse concerning the Russo-Ukrainian war",
                    "supports": [
                        "Evidence of online discourse and epistemic skepticism",
                        "Practical examples of liar’s-dividend-like claims in a social-media sample"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Representative population belief",
                        "Causal behavior change",
                        "Frontline operational effect"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Representative population belief; Causal behavior change; Frontline operational effect",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Representative population belief",
                        "Causal behavior change",
                        "Frontline operational effect"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-51-C2PA-2-4-EXPLAINER",
                    "title": "C2PA 2.4 explainer and durable Content Credentials guidance",
                    "url": "https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.4/explainer/Explainer.html",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_TECHNICAL_STANDARD_EXPLAINER",
                    "source_tier": "PUBLIC_STANDARD_HTML_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_STANDARD_SCOPE_AND_LIMITATION_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity",
                    "publication_date": "Version 2.4; accessed 2026-07-28",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_SPECIFICATION_VERSION_ACCESSED_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Open technical standard — cross-jurisdictional",
                    "supports": [
                        "Embedded provenance metadata can be removed",
                        "Soft bindings can support discovery of remotely stored credentials after separation",
                        "Durability is an implementation architecture rather than a guarantee that every transformation preserves recoverability"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That credentials survive every screenshot, repost, print-scan, platform, or crisis chain",
                        "That a signed asset depicts a true event",
                        "That unsigned media is false or synthetic"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That credentials survive every screenshot, repost, print-scan, platform, or crisis chain; That a signed asset depicts a true event; That unsigned media is false or synthetic",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That credentials survive every screenshot, repost, print-scan, platform, or crisis chain",
                        "That a signed asset depicts a true event",
                        "That unsigned media is false or synthetic"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-38-C2PA-SPEC-2-4",
                    "title": "C2PA Technical Specification 2.4 and implementation guidance",
                    "url": "https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.4/specs/C2PA_Specification.html",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_TECHNICAL_STANDARD",
                    "source_tier": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_STANDARD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "methods_transparency": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "issuing_body": "Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity",
                    "publication_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "access_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENTLY_RETRIEVED_2026-07-29",
                    "jurisdiction": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "supports": "Defines durable Content Credentials, soft bindings, manifest repositories, and C2PA trust lists.",
                    "does_not_support": "Truth of depicted events, universal adoption, or reliable credential survival across every crisis chain.",
                    "known_blind_spot": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "prohibited_inference": "Truth of depicted events, universal adoption, or reliable credential survival across every crisis chain."
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Cryptographic provenance can verify a signed history or claim, but it does not prove the represented event is true, and missing credentials do not prove media is false. Experimental evidence also shows that false deepfake claims do not work uniformly across formats and contexts.",
                    "wording_sha256": "64b9e33bf80d5e877e1bb5973307abc5777b5158cace7564eb3e07ded3d23d79",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 41,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-11-liars-dividend-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "89318189fa77b10bd114b4b911adbc568f52f622ed07b4d801117be8d9106286"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CLARIFICATION",
                    "wording": "C2PA can authenticate signed provenance claims, and durable credentials can use watermarking or fingerprinting to recover separated manifests. Embedded metadata can still be removed; credentials do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "53a4e3bd5691248658e03951a56449f24c5c533e0444e43a906690e3356126ae",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Integrated the standard’s own statement that embedded metadata can be removed and that soft bindings aid recovery rather than guarantee survival.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-01",
                    "number": 42,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-11-liars-dividend-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "556ff8f1b7c872b3d1b9eb7d5fdb8d3557510363a25cb1229a0771a297de9aa7"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-11",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-02",
                    "number": 43,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-11-liars-dividend-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "2e22a7479e162842ccac2f2c87fd83a19944ee093b0848d42d2f8ac1d357e700"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-11",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-03",
                    "number": 44,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-11-liars-dividend-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "a2bd72740361895a311bce5895ebfa86689ea080c8485cc71eef5aaeab6a15ea"
                },
                {
                    "number": 63,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-11",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "a2bd72740361895a311bce5895ebfa86689ea080c8485cc71eef5aaeab6a15ea",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-11-liars-dividend-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "c5d85846295645fa54ef09817f8d2bc6ff8d3f60f5367b75be7106f6a31beaf2"
                },
                {
                    "number": 76,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-11",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "c5d85846295645fa54ef09817f8d2bc6ff8d3f60f5367b75be7106f6a31beaf2",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-11-liars-dividend-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "6a7a97c672e842bf13480fae7d27e7f2fa3a5aaf2817c591be506472d8b943d5"
                },
                {
                    "number": 89,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-11",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "6a7a97c672e842bf13480fae7d27e7f2fa3a5aaf2817c591be506472d8b943d5",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "fb77d1bab5f4056ec822715b4b75c09e59334117cecb10b36aef6e5d1218d3b5"
                },
                {
                    "number": 102,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "C2PA 2.4 supports signed provenance claims, durable credentials, soft bindings, manifest recovery, and trust-list governance. Credentials can still be absent, stripped, untrusted, or semantically misleading; they do not prove the depicted event is true, and their absence does not make media false. Liar’s-dividend effects remain context-dependent.",
                    "wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-11",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-11-LIARS-DIVIDEND-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "fb77d1bab5f4056ec822715b4b75c09e59334117cecb10b36aef6e5d1218d3b5",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "2d422bad94e7ddf4c4604b8bf5bb0090dd446ce95510b76d0c5e0b1221f2a022",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-11-liars-dividend",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "4dbab513cbbba85dfb1a9d057eea7b868dd4e8c2fa0eb49a1ba329261f2d0962"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "72232d576d4783fd623728816d754773a1c5de006f90775f4f388f17b76e4e0b",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Democratic defense should target behavior and foreign interference, not lawful belief",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
            "current_wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
            "record_digest_sha256": "36f22e2cd3807d09b7f62524f0aa614aa82fb7b0e1b61dcdcc21241416b87fdf",
            "plain_language_summary": "Democratic defense should focus on concealed coordination and technical abuse rather than lawful belief or viewpoint.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_GOVERNANCE_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Mandates should be specific, legally bounded, transparent, independently overseen, correction-capable, and separated from content or belief policing.",
            "does_not_establish": "That every institutional classification is correct or that the French model is universally transferable.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "VIGINUM changes its mandate or an oversight body identifies mischaracterization.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-21-VIGINUM-AI-THREAT",
                    "title": "Information threat linked to artificial intelligence",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/20250207_NP_SGDSN_VIGINUM_Rapport%20menace%20informationnelle%20IA_EN_0.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_THREAT_ASSESSMENT",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_ISSUING_BODY_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "VIGINUM / French Secretariat-General for National Defence and Security",
                    "publication_date": "2025-02-07",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "2025_REPORT_AS_PUBLISHED",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "The stated French institutional mandate",
                        "Behavior- and foreign-interference-focused defensive framing"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That every classification is correct",
                        "Authority over lawful domestic belief",
                        "Strategic effect of every detected campaign"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That every classification is correct; Authority over lawful domestic belief; Strategic effect of every detected campaign",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That every classification is correct",
                        "Authority over lawful domestic belief",
                        "Strategic effect of every detected campaign"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-46-VIGINUM-ACTIVITY-2024",
                    "title": "VIGINUM 2024 activity report",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/VIGINUM_rapport_activit%C3%A9_24_vd.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ACTIVITY_AND_GOVERNANCE_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_TRANSPARENCY_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "VIGINUM / Secretariat-General for National Defence and Security",
                    "publication_date": "2025-12-30",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "Published mandate and data-governance controls",
                        "Publicly stated minimization, retention, and oversight mechanisms",
                        "Operational activity described by the institution"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent false-positive rate",
                        "Incident-level appeals or correction outcomes",
                        "Affected-community experience"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent false-positive rate; Incident-level appeals or correction outcomes; Affected-community experience",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent false-positive rate",
                        "Incident-level appeals or correction outcomes",
                        "Affected-community experience"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-47-VIGINUM-ETHICS-2024-OPINION",
                    "title": "Opinion of the VIGINUM Ethics and Scientific Committee on 2024 activity",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Publications/2025%2012%2022%20-%20AVIS%20DU%20COMITE%CC%81%20E%CC%81THIQUE%20ET%20SCIENTIFIQUE%20DE%20VIGINUM.pdf",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_OR_SEPARATE_OVERSIGHT_OPINION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PUBLIC_OVERSIGHT_COMMITTEE_OPINION",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "VIGINUM Ethics and Scientific Committee",
                    "publication_date": "2025-12-22",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence and public role of the oversight committee",
                        "Committee access to collection information and analysis notes",
                        "Public recommendations concerning the legal and institutional framework"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A judicially independent appeal forum",
                        "Measured false-positive burden",
                        "Correction outcomes for specific people or organizations"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A judicially independent appeal forum; Measured false-positive burden; Correction outcomes for specific people or organizations",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A judicially independent appeal forum",
                        "Measured false-positive burden",
                        "Correction outcomes for specific people or organizations"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-48-VIGINUM-MUNICIPAL-2026",
                    "title": "Protection of public debate during the March 2026 municipal elections",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/viginum/Publications/20260611_SGDSN_VIGINUM_Rapport-public_Elections-municipales.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ELECTION_PERIOD_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_ELECTION_REPORT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "VIGINUM / election coordination network",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "Four operations reported by VIGINUM for the election period",
                        "Public reporting and threat-characterization workflow",
                        "Institutional attribution confidence as stated in the report"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent verification of every attribution",
                        "False-positive, appeal, or correction outcomes",
                        "Voter belief or behavior change"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent verification of every attribution; False-positive, appeal, or correction outcomes; Voter belief or behavior change",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent verification of every attribution",
                        "False-positive, appeal, or correction outcomes",
                        "Voter belief or behavior change"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-53-VIGINUM-2026-MISSION-DECREE",
                    "title": "VIGINUM mission page recording the 2026 decree that strengthened the service’s remit",
                    "url": "https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/viginum",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_MISSION_AND_LEGAL_CURRENTNESS_PAGE",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_HTML_PAGE_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_AND_LEGAL_CURRENTNESS_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale (SGDSN)",
                    "publication_date": "2026-02-11 decree; page accessed 2026-07-28",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "France",
                    "supports": [
                        "The service remained active and its remit was formally updated in 2026",
                        "The official characterization of the mission as defensive",
                        "Current operator and public-debate protection scope"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent validation of attribution decisions",
                        "A public false-positive rate or complete correction and appeal system",
                        "Affected-community acceptance or behavior effects"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent validation of attribution decisions; A public false-positive rate or complete correction and appeal system; Affected-community acceptance or behavior effects",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent validation of attribution decisions",
                        "A public false-positive rate or complete correction and appeal system",
                        "Affected-community acceptance or behavior effects"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-25-VIGINUM-MANDATE",
                    "title": "Untitled source",
                    "url": null,
                    "source_type": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_tier": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_relationship": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "methods_transparency": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "issuing_body": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "publication_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "access_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "currentness_state": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "jurisdiction": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "supports": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "does_not_support": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "known_blind_spot": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": "Do not infer beyond the source's stated scope."
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-41-VIGINUM-CNIL-REVIEW",
                    "title": "CNIL opinion on VIGINUM personal-data processing",
                    "url": "https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000044454840",
                    "source_type": "PRIMARY_REGULATORY_OPINION",
                    "source_tier": "UNCLASSIFIED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_REGULATORY_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "methods_transparency": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "issuing_body": "Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés / Legifrance",
                    "publication_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "access_date": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "currentness_state": "RETRIEVED_2026-07-29",
                    "jurisdiction": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "supports": "Documents data-minimization concerns, retention limits, oversight, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes.",
                    "does_not_support": "A public register of false positives, successful remedies, affected-community outcomes, or error rates.",
                    "known_blind_spot": "NOT_RECORDED",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "prohibited_inference": "A public register of false positives, successful remedies, affected-community outcomes, or error rates."
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "A defensible cognitive-security mandate can focus on concealed foreign direction, artificial amplification, impersonation, technical tampering, and coordinated inauthentic behavior while preserving lawful domestic belief, dissent, anonymity, journalism, and political opposition.",
                    "wording_sha256": "8d3ff1c0768dea821a63f31989795872fbfee2e80b88f684c51702f228799c36",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 45,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-12-democratic-defense-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "049cd64e342f5682be46f09546edeedb96ec8f95fcb635fc319a97ba0a78edba"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. VIGINUM’s 2026 remit update documents institutional currentness, not an independently verified false-positive or remedy record.",
                    "wording_sha256": "c50a0cb3f301ce6bc287dca2557a9332ef1e81e0be1942e7851a77f5516b5fdd",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Added the 2026 VIGINUM remit update while preserving false-positive, remedy, and affected-community gaps.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-01",
                    "number": 46,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-12-democratic-defense-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "99ecf8e2f6f447763fcc40f6f91b2d486e6b525b728fade15f5b79a92dd5e884"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-12",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-02",
                    "number": 47,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-12-democratic-defense-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "d3463fb8a57644dca5d4920a4c2b268ebd31ec0e24bf3ea315017e7b9ec13f23"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-12",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-03",
                    "number": 48,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-12-democratic-defense-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "ee1a6d66947d091c01aa2c57f47f0cb2e379ad3f2d2327654e9db0b6fd4d7d3c"
                },
                {
                    "number": 64,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-12",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "ee1a6d66947d091c01aa2c57f47f0cb2e379ad3f2d2327654e9db0b6fd4d7d3c",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-12-democratic-defense-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "eab89330716274e3bb896c614cfad356764c4cbcaacb10afe01a30839fd493bd"
                },
                {
                    "number": 77,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-12",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "eab89330716274e3bb896c614cfad356764c4cbcaacb10afe01a30839fd493bd",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-12-democratic-defense-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "1c581c8d08356fa1a2a2e5347678931fda85d381e8197d2fe611916070af4748"
                },
                {
                    "number": 90,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-12",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "1c581c8d08356fa1a2a2e5347678931fda85d381e8197d2fe611916070af4748",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "f57309dab5c3351a2078935968c18bedd378a5b2996ba0a681fb307f861aad5f"
                },
                {
                    "number": 103,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Democratic cognitive defense should target concealed coordination, foreign direction, impersonation, technical tampering, artificial amplification, fraud, and platform abuse rather than lawful belief. Current VIGINUM and CNIL records document institutional activity, oversight, retention limits, and indirect access, rectification, and erasure routes—not a public register proving false-positive frequency or completed remedy outcomes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-12",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-12-DEMOCRATIC-DEFENSE-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "f57309dab5c3351a2078935968c18bedd378a5b2996ba0a681fb307f861aad5f",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "cccec9f9d5e2a028d68e8ef326be53b858974845dbb3469ee942475bbb4bcaeb",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-12-democratic-defense",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "65e552bcb425029c59259b5a922b9b10eda2e4971249baffe68061b1417c3bdf"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "09bf229e695735f016c3279803945a024ebc3186b2c219a9b8ea14da431bd352",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
            "claim_version": "WIP72-CURRENT-1",
            "title": "Aggregate forecasting and person-level risk scoring are different system classes",
            "public_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism",
            "public_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/field-realism#claim-real-13-predictive",
            "permanent_status_route": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#status-claim-real-13-predictive",
            "current_wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
            "current_wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
            "record_digest_sha256": "93e2c2c419e3261fc86d9982c2897fe8af9b30006cdd02a0f701b8bbca3ebb48",
            "plain_language_summary": "Population forecasting, case routing, and person-level risk scoring are different systems and require different evidence.",
            "evidence_maturity": "PRIMARY_OFFICIAL_MULTI_CASE_CLOSURE_PARTIAL",
            "source_review_status": "SOURCE_REVIEWED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
            "specialist_review_status": "NO_REAL_REVIEW_SUBMISSION",
            "repository_adjudication_status": "NO_REPOSITORY_ADJUDICATION",
            "correction_status": "NO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTION",
            "correction_propagation_status": "NOT_TRIGGERED",
            "human_comprehension_status": "PREPARED_NOT_EXECUTED",
            "last_currentness_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31",
            "supports": "Every predictive system should disclose unit, target, horizon, data, model role, threshold, action, evaluation, false-positive and false-negative burden, subgroup effects, human authority, feedback loops, appeal, and current status.",
            "does_not_establish": "That all forecasting is harmful, that all person-level scoring is unlawful, or that a model’s operator description proves independent validity.",
            "what_would_change_assessment": "An operator or court changes a system’s purpose, authority, status, or outcome.",
            "related_category_ids": [],
            "source_records": [
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-11-CHICAGO-PREDICTIVE-RISK",
                    "title": "Advisory Concerning the Chicago Police Department’s Predictive Risk Models",
                    "url": "https://igchicago.org/publications/advisory-concerning-the-chicago-police-departments-predictive-risk-models/",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_OVERSIGHT_ADVISORY",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_OVERSIGHT_PAGE_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OVERSIGHT_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "City of Chicago Office of Inspector General",
                    "publication_date": "2020-01-30",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_DEPLOYMENT_DECOMMISSIONED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Chicago, Illinois, United States",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence, function, governance history, and decommissioning",
                        "Person-level scoring as distinct from aggregate forecasting"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That every predictive-policing system uses the same model",
                        "A single causal effect on crime or public trust",
                        "Complete downstream deletion of historical scores"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That every predictive-policing system uses the same model; A single causal effect on crime or public trust; Complete downstream deletion of historical scores",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That every predictive-policing system uses the same model",
                        "A single causal effect on crime or public trust",
                        "Complete downstream deletion of historical scores"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-12-ALLEGHENY-FAMILY-SCREENING",
                    "title": "Allegheny Family Screening Tool",
                    "url": "https://www.alleghenycounty.us/Services/Human-Services-DHS/DHS-News-and-Events/Accomplishments-and-Innovations/Allegheny-Family-Screening-Tool",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_SYSTEM_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_OPERATOR_PAGE_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Allegheny County Department of Human Services",
                    "publication_date": "2025-01-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_OPERATOR_DESCRIPTION_AS_ACCESSED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States",
                    "supports": [
                        "Officially described purpose and decision role",
                        "A documented person/family-level risk-screening deployment"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent accuracy, fairness, or causal benefit",
                        "That human judgment neutralizes automation bias",
                        "Complete remedy for errors"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent accuracy, fairness, or causal benefit; That human judgment neutralizes automation bias; Complete remedy for errors",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent accuracy, fairness, or causal benefit",
                        "That human judgment neutralizes automation bias",
                        "Complete remedy for errors"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-13-SYRI-JUDGMENT",
                    "title": "District Court of The Hague judgment concerning SyRI",
                    "url": "https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:1878",
                    "source_type": "JUDICIAL_DECISION",
                    "source_tier": "PRIMARY_JUDICIAL_RECORD_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_JUDICIAL_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "PARTIAL_OR_UNRESOLVED",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Rechtbank Den Haag (District Court of The Hague)",
                    "publication_date": "2020-02-05",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "JUDGMENT_AS_PUBLISHED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Netherlands",
                    "supports": [
                        "Existence and legal disposition of the SyRI case",
                        "Judicial concern about transparency, proportionality, and privacy"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That all fraud-risk analytics are unlawful",
                        "A universal rule outside the judgment’s jurisdiction and facts",
                        "Complete remediation for affected communities"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That all fraud-risk analytics are unlawful; A universal rule outside the judgment’s jurisdiction and facts; Complete remediation for affected communities",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That all fraud-risk analytics are unlawful",
                        "A universal rule outside the judgment’s jurisdiction and facts",
                        "Complete remediation for affected communities"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-14-CDC-FLUSIGHT",
                    "title": "CDC FluSight forecasting",
                    "url": "https://www.cdc.gov/flu-forecasting/index.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_PUBLIC_HEALTH_FORECASTING_PROGRAM",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PROGRAM_PAGE_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_PROGRAM_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention",
                    "publication_date": "2026-07-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_PROGRAM_AS_ACCESSED",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — public health",
                    "supports": [
                        "A beneficial aggregate forecasting use case",
                        "Operational distinction between population-level planning and person-level scoring"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Perfect forecast accuracy",
                        "Authority to take coercive action against individuals",
                        "Transferability to political or security prediction"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Perfect forecast accuracy; Authority to take coercive action against individuals; Transferability to political or security prediction",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Perfect forecast accuracy",
                        "Authority to take coercive action against individuals",
                        "Transferability to political or security prediction"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-15-HOME-OFFICE-CARS",
                    "title": "Home Office Complexity Application Routing Solution — Visits",
                    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/algorithmic-transparency-records/home-office-complexity-application-routing-solution-visits",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_ALGORITHMIC_TRANSPARENCY_RECORD",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_TRANSPARENCY_RECORD_LINKED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_TRANSPARENCY_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "UK Home Office",
                    "publication_date": "2024-12-17",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_RECORD_ACCESSED",
                    "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom",
                    "supports": [
                        "A documented workflow-routing deployment",
                        "Distinction between prioritization/routing and final decision authority"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Absence of automation bias",
                        "Fairness or accuracy across groups",
                        "No effect on processing time or applicant burden"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Absence of automation bias; Fairness or accuracy across groups; No effect on processing time or applicant burden",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Absence of automation bias",
                        "Fairness or accuracy across groups",
                        "No effect on processing time or applicant burden"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-16-UNHCR-DISPLACEMENT-FORECAST",
                    "title": "UNHCR predictive analytics for forced displacement",
                    "url": "https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/unhcr-technical-workshop-2025.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_TECHNICAL_WORKSHOP_RECORD",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_INSTITUTIONAL_TECHNICAL_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees",
                    "publication_date": "2025-04-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "2025_TECHNICAL_RECORD",
                    "jurisdiction": "International humanitarian planning",
                    "supports": [
                        "A humanitarian aggregate forecasting use case",
                        "Planning-oriented rather than person-level punitive application"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Reliable prediction of individual movement",
                        "Automatic entitlement or enforcement decisions",
                        "Universal model performance across crises"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Reliable prediction of individual movement; Automatic entitlement or enforcement decisions; Universal model performance across crises",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Reliable prediction of individual movement",
                        "Automatic entitlement or enforcement decisions",
                        "Universal model performance across crises"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-17-EU-JRC-DYNAMIC-CONFLICT-RISK",
                    "title": "Dynamic Conflict Risk Model technical report",
                    "url": "https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC141725/JRC141725_01.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_RESEARCH_REPORT",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OFFICIAL_RESEARCH",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "European Commission Joint Research Centre",
                    "publication_date": "2025-06-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "2025_REPORT_AS_PUBLISHED",
                    "jurisdiction": "European Union — conflict early warning",
                    "supports": [
                        "A documented aggregate conflict-forecasting system",
                        "Explicit integration of quantitative and qualitative judgment"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Certainty about conflict onset",
                        "A lawful basis for person-level intervention",
                        "Strategic effect of any action taken from a forecast"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Certainty about conflict onset; A lawful basis for person-level intervention; Strategic effect of any action taken from a forecast",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Certainty about conflict onset",
                        "A lawful basis for person-level intervention",
                        "Strategic effect of any action taken from a forecast"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-23-CHICAGO-NIJ-EVALUATION",
                    "title": "Predictions Put Into Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Chicago’s Predictive Policing Pilot",
                    "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/predictions-put-practice-quasi-experimental-evaluation-chicagos-predictive",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_RESEARCH_SUMMARY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "OFFICIAL_RESEARCH_SUMMARY_OF_QUASI_EXPERIMENTAL_EVALUATION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. National Institute of Justice",
                    "publication_date": "2017-09-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal research publication",
                    "supports": [
                        "The evaluated SSL pilot involved 426 people estimated to be at highest risk of gun violence",
                        "The study used time-series and matched-comparison methods",
                        "The evaluation did not find a significant reduction in homicide or shooting victimization attributable to list placement and reported increased likelihood of arrest for a shooting among listed people"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Complete individual-level notice or remedy",
                        "That every later CPD risk model had the same implementation",
                        "Causal proof concerning all predictive-policing systems"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Complete individual-level notice or remedy; That every later CPD risk model had the same implementation; Causal proof concerning all predictive-policing systems",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Complete individual-level notice or remedy",
                        "That every later CPD risk model had the same implementation",
                        "Causal proof concerning all predictive-policing systems"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-24-SYRI-DATA-DESTRUCTION",
                    "title": "Parliamentary answers concerning SyRI data destruction and decision use",
                    "url": "https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-31066-1051.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_PARLIAMENTARY_ANSWER",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_EXECUTIVE_ANSWER_TO_PARLIAMENT",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Government of the Netherlands — House of Representatives records",
                    "publication_date": "2022-06-21",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Netherlands",
                    "supports": [
                        "An official statement that SyRI-processed data had been destroyed by June 2022",
                        "An official statement that responsible bodies did not make decisions based on SyRI-derived data",
                        "SyRI algorithms and criteria were not used in the named Detectie aan de Poort systems"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent forensic verification of destruction",
                        "Deletion from every backup, derivative, vendor, or institutional system",
                        "Complete repair for communities subjected to SyRI projects"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent forensic verification of destruction; Deletion from every backup, derivative, vendor, or institutional system; Complete repair for communities subjected to SyRI projects",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent forensic verification of destruction",
                        "Deletion from every backup, derivative, vendor, or institutional system",
                        "Complete repair for communities subjected to SyRI projects"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-25-AFST-PHASE2-EVALUATION",
                    "title": "Impact Evaluation of the Allegheny Family Screening Tool — Phase 2",
                    "url": "https://analytics.alleghenycounty.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/23-ACDHS-19_FamilyScreeningToolUpdate_v2.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OPERATOR_COMMISSIONED_IMPACT_EVALUATION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "OPERATOR_COMMISSIONED_MULTIVARIABLE_EVALUATION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Allegheny County Department of Human Services / commissioned Stanford evaluation",
                    "publication_date": "2023-09-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States",
                    "supports": [
                        "Reported changes in screening and later child-welfare outcomes after AFST implementation",
                        "Risk-stratified and race-stratified analyses",
                        "The report’s own methodological and causal limitations"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A randomized causal estimate of the tool alone",
                        "Absence of confounding from COVID-19 or contemporaneous policy and practice changes",
                        "Complete family-level notice, appeal, correction, or downstream repair"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A randomized causal estimate of the tool alone; Absence of confounding from COVID-19 or contemporaneous policy and practice changes; Complete family-level notice, appeal, correction, or downstream repair",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A randomized causal estimate of the tool alone",
                        "Absence of confounding from COVID-19 or contemporaneous policy and practice changes",
                        "Complete family-level notice, appeal, correction, or downstream repair"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-26-AFST-HUMAN-RACIAL-DISPARITY",
                    "title": "Algorithms, Humans and Racial Disparities in Child Protection Systems",
                    "url": "https://analytics.alleghenycounty.us/research-working-papers/",
                    "source_type": "PEER_REVIEWED_OR_ACADEMIC_EMPIRICAL_STUDY",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "ACADEMIC_EMPIRICAL_ANALYSIS",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Peer-reviewed / academic research associated with AFST",
                    "publication_date": "2023-06-19",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States",
                    "supports": [
                        "Human reviewers did not mechanically reproduce algorithm-only recommendations",
                        "Human intervention altered measured Black–white screen-in disparity in the studied setting",
                        "Automation effects must be evaluated as a human-system process"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "That all human review reduces disparities",
                        "Complete absence of disparate impact",
                        "Generalization beyond the AFST setting and period"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "That all human review reduces disparities; Complete absence of disparate impact; Generalization beyond the AFST setting and period",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "That all human review reduces disparities",
                        "Complete absence of disparate impact",
                        "Generalization beyond the AFST setting and period"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-27-CARS-ICIBI-INSPECTION",
                    "title": "An inspection of visit visa operations, December 2022 to January 2023",
                    "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6440ed7522ef3b000f66f58e/An_inspection_of_visit_visa_operations_December_2022_to_January_2023.pdf",
                    "source_type": "INDEPENDENT_GOVERNMENT_INSPECTION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "INDEPENDENT_INSPECTION_OF_OPERATOR_WORKFLOW",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration",
                    "publication_date": "2023-04-20",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom",
                    "supports": [
                        "CARS appeared generally accurate in routing application complexity in the inspected period",
                        "Complex applications took longer and some practices emerged outside policy",
                        "The inspection found a lack of first-line assurance and recommended continuing equality review"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Applicant-level causal effects of routing",
                        "Customer or affected-person experience; the inspection states that perspective was not examined",
                        "Complete subgroup error rates, appeals, or downstream remedy"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Applicant-level causal effects of routing; Customer or affected-person experience; the inspection states that perspective was not examined; Complete subgroup error rates, appeals, or downstream remedy",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Applicant-level causal effects of routing",
                        "Customer or affected-person experience; the inspection states that perspective was not examined",
                        "Complete subgroup error rates, appeals, or downstream remedy"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-28-CARS-HOME-OFFICE-RESPONSE",
                    "title": "Home Office response to inspection of visit visa operations",
                    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/response-to-a-report-on-an-inspection-of-visit-visa-operations/home-office-response-to-report-on-inspection-of-visit-visa-operations",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_OPERATOR_RESPONSE",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_RESPONSE_TO_INDEPENDENT_INSPECTION",
                    "source_independence": "INDEPENDENT_FOR_LIMITED_PROPOSITION",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "UK Home Office",
                    "publication_date": "2023-04-20",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom",
                    "supports": [
                        "Operator acceptance of all five inspection recommendations",
                        "Permanent implementation status announced in April 2023",
                        "Operator description of equality-profile review"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent proof that every recommendation produced the intended outcome",
                        "Applicant-level fairness or remedy",
                        "Current 2026 performance without a new inspection"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent proof that every recommendation produced the intended outcome; Applicant-level fairness or remedy; Current 2026 performance without a new inspection",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent proof that every recommendation produced the intended outcome",
                        "Applicant-level fairness or remedy",
                        "Current 2026 performance without a new inspection"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-29-FLUSIGHT-2024-25-EVALUATION",
                    "title": "FluSight 2024–2025 Season Evaluation",
                    "url": "https://www.cdc.gov/flu-forecasting/evaluation/2024-2025-report.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_OPERATOR_EVALUATION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_PERFORMANCE_EVALUATION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention",
                    "publication_date": "2025-09-16",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal public health",
                    "supports": [
                        "The ensemble intervals failed to anticipate the late-December 2024 and January 2025 hospitalization increase",
                        "Forecast publication was delayed until March 5, 2025 after prediction intervals reliably captured observed outcomes",
                        "Model comparison and uncertainty treatment for the season"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "A guarantee of future forecast accuracy",
                        "A direct causal estimate of planning or health outcomes produced by the forecasts",
                        "Individual-level medical decisions"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "A guarantee of future forecast accuracy; A direct causal estimate of planning or health outcomes produced by the forecasts; Individual-level medical decisions",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "A guarantee of future forecast accuracy",
                        "A direct causal estimate of planning or health outcomes produced by the forecasts",
                        "Individual-level medical decisions"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-30-FLUSIGHT-2023-24-EVALUATION",
                    "title": "FluSight 2023–2024 Season Evaluation",
                    "url": "https://www.cdc.gov/flu-forecasting/evaluation/2023-2024-report.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_OPERATOR_EVALUATION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_PERFORMANCE_EVALUATION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention",
                    "publication_date": "2025-04-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal public health",
                    "supports": [
                        "The ensemble outperformed most submitted models in the season",
                        "Rapid changes remained difficult and intervals missed an observed increase and decline",
                        "The role of ensemble methods and calibrated uncertainty"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Direct evidence of downstream resource-allocation benefit",
                        "Performance outside evaluated seasons",
                        "Individual clinical validity"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Direct evidence of downstream resource-allocation benefit; Performance outside evaluated seasons; Individual clinical validity",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Direct evidence of downstream resource-allocation benefit",
                        "Performance outside evaluated seasons",
                        "Individual clinical validity"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-31-UNHCR-JETSON-TECHNICAL",
                    "title": "Project Jetson technical specifications",
                    "url": "https://jetson.unhcr.org/tech.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_TECHNICAL_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_TECHNICAL_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "HIGH_FOR_STATED_PROCEDURE",
                    "issuing_body": "United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees",
                    "publication_date": "2018-01-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "HISTORICAL_TECHNICAL_RECORD_CURRENTNESS_BOUNDED",
                    "jurisdiction": "Somalia / UNHCR humanitarian operations",
                    "supports": [
                        "Historical data covered seven years and 18 Somalia regions",
                        "The stated modeling objective and data pipeline",
                        "Operator-reported technical limitations"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent out-of-sample operational impact",
                        "Affected-community benefit or harm",
                        "Current production deployment across UNHCR"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent out-of-sample operational impact; Affected-community benefit or harm; Current production deployment across UNHCR",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent out-of-sample operational impact",
                        "Affected-community benefit or harm",
                        "Current production deployment across UNHCR"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-32-UNHCR-AI-APPROACH-2025",
                    "title": "UNHCR AI Approach",
                    "url": "https://www.unhcr.org/digitalstrategy/wp-content/uploads/sites/161/2025/09/UNHCR-AI-Approach-Sept25-Final.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_POLICY_AND_PROGRAM_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_tier": "RECEIPT_ONLY_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_POLICY_DESCRIPTION",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees",
                    "publication_date": "2025-09-01",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "CURRENT_AS_OF_2026-07-28",
                    "jurisdiction": "Global / UNHCR",
                    "supports": [
                        "UNHCR’s stated current institutional approach to predictive analytics and AI",
                        "Use cases described for planning, supply chain, nowcasting, and scenario exploration",
                        "Governance principles asserted by the operator"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent model accuracy or benefit",
                        "Individual or community consent and remedy outcomes",
                        "A single unified production model"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent model accuracy or benefit; Individual or community consent and remedy outcomes; A single unified production model",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent model accuracy or benefit",
                        "Individual or community consent and remedy outcomes",
                        "A single unified production model"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-54-AFST-FY2026-27-BUDGET",
                    "title": "Allegheny County FY 2026–27 Needs-Based Plan and Budget describing continued AFST use",
                    "url": "https://www.alleghenycounty.us/files/assets/county/v/2/services/dhs/documents/annual-plans-and-budgets/needs-based-plan-amp-budget/nbb02_26-27.pdf",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CURRENT_PROGRAM_PLAN",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_PDF_PUBLIC_URL_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_CURRENTNESS_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "Allegheny County Department of Human Services",
                    "publication_date": "FY 2026–27 plan; accessed 2026-07-28",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "ACTIVE_OPERATOR_DESCRIPTION_FY2026_27",
                    "jurisdiction": "Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States",
                    "supports": [
                        "Continued operator-described use in the FY 2026–27 planning record",
                        "The tool’s screening-assistance role",
                        "Currentness of the operator’s stated program architecture"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent current calibration or subgroup validity",
                        "Complete notice, appeal, correction, or downstream repair outcomes",
                        "Causal improvement in child or family outcomes"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent current calibration or subgroup validity; Complete notice, appeal, correction, or downstream repair outcomes; Causal improvement in child or family outcomes",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent current calibration or subgroup validity",
                        "Complete notice, appeal, correction, or downstream repair outcomes",
                        "Causal improvement in child or family outcomes"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-55-FLUSIGHT-2025-26-FINAL-RELEASE",
                    "title": "FluSight final forecast release for the 2025–2026 influenza season",
                    "url": "https://www.cdc.gov/flu-forecasting/data-vis/emergency-department-visits.html",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CURRENT_SEASON_STATUS",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_HTML_PAGE_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_SEASON_CURRENTNESS_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-11",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "2025_26_SEASON_COMPLETE_PROGRAM_CONTINUES",
                    "jurisdiction": "United States — federal public health",
                    "supports": [
                        "The program remained operational through the 2025–2026 season",
                        "Seasonal rather than continuous publication status",
                        "A planned resumption for the 2026–2027 season"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Uniform accuracy at every horizon or during rapid trend changes",
                        "A person-level risk decision system",
                        "Causal effect on any particular public-health intervention"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Uniform accuracy at every horizon or during rapid trend changes; A person-level risk decision system; Causal effect on any particular public-health intervention",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Uniform accuracy at every horizon or during rapid trend changes",
                        "A person-level risk decision system",
                        "Causal effect on any particular public-health intervention"
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "source_id": "AUTH-56-CARS-2026-HOME-OFFICE-RESPONSE",
                    "title": "Home Office response confirming continued use and published guidance for CARS",
                    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/response-to-an-inspection-on-overstayers/response-to-an-inspection-on-overstayers",
                    "source_type": "OFFICIAL_CURRENT_PROGRAM_RESPONSE",
                    "source_tier": "OFFICIAL_HTML_PAGE_RECORDED",
                    "source_relationship": "PRIMARY_OPERATOR_CURRENTNESS_AND_SCOPE_RECORD",
                    "source_independence": "NOT_INDEPENDENT_OPERATOR_OR_ISSUER_RECORD",
                    "methods_transparency": "PARTIAL_PUBLIC_METHODS",
                    "issuing_body": "UK Home Office",
                    "publication_date": "2026-06-25",
                    "access_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "currentness_state": "ACTIVE_AS_OF_2026-06-25",
                    "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom",
                    "supports": [
                        "Continued use of CARS in 2026",
                        "The operator’s stated routing rather than final-decision role",
                        "Current public-guidance status"
                    ],
                    "does_not_support": [
                        "Independent subgroup error rates or fairness",
                        "Absence of automation bias in downstream scrutiny",
                        "Complete applicant notice, appeal, or remedy outcomes"
                    ],
                    "known_blind_spot": "Independent subgroup error rates or fairness; Absence of automation bias in downstream scrutiny; Complete applicant notice, appeal, or remedy outcomes",
                    "dependent_claim": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "prohibited_inference": [
                        "Independent subgroup error rates or fairness",
                        "Absence of automation bias in downstream scrutiny",
                        "Complete applicant notice, appeal, or remedy outcomes"
                    ]
                }
            ],
            "evidence_stages": {
                "artifact_or_event_existence": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "content_status": "SUPPORTED_WITH_STATED_LIMITS",
                "coordination_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "actor_identity_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "sponsorship_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intent_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "output_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "distribution_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "availability_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "reach_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "exposure_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "attention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "recall_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "comprehension_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "credibility_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "belief_or_attitude_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "intention_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "behavior_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "operational_outcome_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM",
                "strategic_effect_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE_TO_THIS_CLAIM"
            },
            "history": [
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-01",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "PRE-WIP58-RETAINED",
                    "effective_date": "BEFORE_2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "RETAINED_HISTORICAL_WORDING",
                    "wording": "Population-level forecasts used for planning must be separated from person- or family-level risk scores used to route, investigate, screen, deny, or intensify intervention. Accuracy, authority, rights burden, feedback loops, and remedy differ substantially between these system classes.",
                    "wording_sha256": "44b2cf7afbe6293cb0c089c972a0f0abadd6a7f1ae440834a704b222e4706792",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Exact prior wording retained from the versioned correction ledger; this is not an accepted-correction event.",
                    "supersedes": null,
                    "number": 49,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-13-predictive-01",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "12f203ed25b9e901f06885dc168f60785c567530380d60aa7e178efe387c26c7"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-02",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP58-CURRENTNESS-REFRESH",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-28",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "CORR-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "Added current AFST, CARS, and FluSight program-status records without upgrading validity claims.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-01",
                    "number": 50,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-13-predictive-02",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "62e80af6e394213f006a736e499fa3c6b704a316bd1011534ab7ca60c7ea196c"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-03",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP65-CANONICAL",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-30",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-30T23:30:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CANONICAL_OPERATION_NORMALIZATION_AND_CURRENTNESS_REFRESH",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-65-13",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.65 canonicalized the live operation and public status; no accepted correction or real specialist review occurred.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-02",
                    "number": 51,
                    "current": false,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-13-predictive-03",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "dc9de661b4881deaaa64302da9ae504a96033cb62cbed4af5273b189662cc48f"
                },
                {
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-04",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP66-INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T12:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "CURRENTNESS_REFRESH_AND_MACHINE_EXPORT_INTEROPERABILITY",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-66-13",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.66 adds deterministic machine export, public version history, queue and retest accountability, and currentness v9 without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-03",
                    "number": 52,
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-66-claim-real-13-predictive-04",
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "7f66d77544b6fc92a5afb3a5b8722d628355e66b60a20bd02ec16bb6d780d147"
                },
                {
                    "number": 65,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-05",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP67-EXPORT-V2-COMPATIBILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:00:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_V2_AND_EXTERNAL_ACKNOWLEDGMENT",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-67-13",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.67 adds deterministic schema-v2 export, tested schema-v1 compatibility, immutable release-delta receipts, review-queue lifecycle fixtures, correction acknowledgment states, synthetic-only human-pilot dry runs, and currentness version 10 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-66-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-04",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "7f66d77544b6fc92a5afb3a5b8722d628355e66b60a20bd02ec16bb6d780d147",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "current": true,
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-67-claim-real-13-predictive-05",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "40e6454dcfac14c23d9af93654ce4af6896330474000fe5c5bc161fd03e0238e"
                },
                {
                    "number": 78,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-06",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP68-CONFORMANCE-AND-CORRECTION-OBSERVABILITY",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T23:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_EXPORT_CONFORMANCE_AND_CORRECTION_OBSERVABILITY",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "CLAIM-OPS-68-13",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.68 adds formal schema-v2/v1 conformance receipts, public correction observability, fail-closed queue-recovery fixtures, explicit external request and acknowledgment states, human execution-kit conformance, and currentness version 11 without changing this claim's wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-67-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-05",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "40e6454dcfac14c23d9af93654ce4af6896330474000fe5c5bc161fd03e0238e",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.68",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#history-history-68-claim-real-13-predictive-06",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A reviewer assertion is not automatically the repository conclusion. A visible correction notice is not complete downstream repair. Closure requires current public wording, durable records, indexes, manifests, structured data, automated retests, and any authorized human retest.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "3902efa60ca7120e12727add8ac3f4540d17810702a513bf2bbd33f20f1985a0"
                },
                {
                    "number": 91,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-07",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP69-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T18:15:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_SCHEMA_EVOLUTION_AND_EXTERNAL_DELIVERY_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-69-13",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.69 adds additive schema migration/deprecation governance, prepared external delivery envelopes, queue SLA accountability, correction dependency graphs, and human-pilot authorization gates without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-68-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-06",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "3902efa60ca7120e12727add8ac3f4540d17810702a513bf2bbd33f20f1985a0",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.69",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "58fc5f5bf6e7b613caf79f887c1df5bf2f3ec9cd4b8dc3155a60d117177d4ce7"
                },
                {
                    "number": 104,
                    "history_id": "HISTORY-72-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-08",
                    "claim_id": "CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE",
                    "version_label": "WIP72-CONSUMER-MIGRATION-AND-REHEARSAL-1",
                    "effective_date": "2026-07-31",
                    "recorded_at_utc": "2026-07-31T22:45:00Z",
                    "change_type": "NO_WORDING_CHANGE_CONSUMER_MIGRATION_REHEARSAL_AND_CORRECTION_EXECUTION_ACCOUNTABILITY",
                    "wording": "Aggregate forecasting, case routing, family or person-level risk scoring, and institutional triage are different system classes. Current AFST, CARS, and FluSight records establish continued program activity, not universal validity, fairness, causal benefit, notice, appeal, or complete repair.",
                    "wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "source_record_id": "SOURCE-72-13",
                    "accepted_correction": false,
                    "specialist_disposition": "NONE",
                    "repository_adjudication": "NOT_COMPLETED",
                    "reason": "WIP.72 adds consumer-migration evidence classification, synthetic external-dispatch rehearsal, correction-graph execution simulation, queue-operator accountability, and human-pilot preauthorization without changing claim wording.",
                    "supersedes": "HISTORY-69-CLAIM-REAL-13-PREDICTIVE-07",
                    "prior_history_record_digest_sha256": "58fc5f5bf6e7b613caf79f887c1df5bf2f3ec9cd4b8dc3155a60d117177d4ce7",
                    "prior_wording_sha256": "29a9e76a2e19f7873f7c4d4928217bf67f9537af912014a2e359fe4066e863ba",
                    "current": true,
                    "current_for_release": "2026.07.30-global-international-expansion-wip.72",
                    "history_anchor": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status#history-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "machine_record_uri": "/psyops/ai-psyops/claim-status.json#claim-claim-real-13-predictive",
                    "fixture": false,
                    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
                    "record_digest_sha256": "6d2fac84ecd08c4cfbce97afa741e43fb3a4927e85bf73411465e3dfbc1cb5f0"
                }
            ],
            "notice": "Repository status only. Schema v2 remains default and v1 remains supported without a deprecation or sunset date. No correction is accepted; no external request is authorized or sent; no direct receipt or human session exists.",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform is not proof that every consumer migrated. A prepared external request is not a sent request. A sent request is not a direct acknowledgment. Silence, timeout, cache refresh, or disappearance is not proof of external repair. A graph-valid correction plan is not a completed correction. An authorized human-pilot kit is not a completed human session.",
            "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
            "correction_execution_state": "UNTRIGGERED_ZERO_ACCEPTED_CORRECTIONS",
            "public_record_digest_sha256": "48e65b357f899c3fc7af3d3308dd3be98a6bf8f136941865e78c6b86eb823a18",
            "history_version_count": 10,
            "history_record_count": 10,
            "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS_QUARANTINE_READY"
        }
    ],
    "currentness": [
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-01-NIST-AML-100-2",
            "query": "NIST AI 100-2e2025: Adversarial Machine Learning — A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations",
            "source_url": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ai/100/2/e2025/final",
            "issuing_body": "National Institute of Standards and Technology",
            "document_title": "NIST AI 100-2e2025: Adversarial Machine Learning — A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2025-03-24",
            "lifecycle_state": "FINAL_TECHNICAL_PUBLICATION_WITH_CORRECTED_PDF_AND_POTENTIAL_UPDATES_NOTICE",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "Official NIST status supports a lifecycle-oriented AML taxonomy and records post-publication correction material.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not certify a system, prove universal attack coverage, or establish that a specific deployment is secure.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 1,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-01",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "NIST AI 100-2e2025: Adversarial Machine Learning — A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "Official NIST status supports a lifecycle-oriented AML taxonomy and records post-publication correction material.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not certify a system, prove universal attack coverage, or establish that a specific deployment is secure.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "7166948b61078aa628bdb89a22d049a268f81da2a641eb3c9e90797ff4f7e89b"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-02-MITRE-ATLAS",
            "query": "MITRE ATLAS™",
            "source_url": "https://atlas.mitre.org/",
            "issuing_body": "MITRE",
            "document_title": "MITRE ATLAS™",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-07-31",
            "lifecycle_state": "LIVING_OFFICIAL_KNOWLEDGE_BASE",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "MITRE describes ATLAS as a living knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques against AI-enabled systems based on real-world observations.",
            "does_not_support": "It is not a strictly linear kill chain, legal standard, certification, or proof that every technique applies to a particular system.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 2,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-02",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "MITRE ATLAS™",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "MITRE describes ATLAS as a living knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques against AI-enabled systems based on real-world observations.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is not a strictly linear kill chain, legal standard, certification, or proof that every technique applies to a particular system.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "7079bea3806e293b95baf793e5bb77833ba25af0a9252f66b85cc9df1108aa32"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-03-OWASP-GENAI",
            "query": "OWASP GenAI Security Project",
            "source_url": "https://genai.owasp.org/",
            "issuing_body": "OWASP GenAI Security Project",
            "document_title": "OWASP GenAI Security Project",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-07-31",
            "lifecycle_state": "ACTIVE_OPEN_SOURCE_SECURITY_PROJECT",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The official project covers security and safety risks for generative AI, LLM, agentic, and AI-driven applications.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not create mandatory law, certify products, or prove exploitation in a named system.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 3,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-03",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "OWASP GenAI Security Project",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The official project covers security and safety risks for generative AI, LLM, agentic, and AI-driven applications.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not create mandatory law, certify products, or prove exploitation in a named system.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "a69af849d3a96aefcc73d911e1311215afeb9c9cfc33d61e2924ce2f995e2423"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-04-OWASP-LLM-2025",
            "query": "2025 Top 10 Risk & Mitigations for LLMs and Gen AI Apps",
            "source_url": "https://genai.owasp.org/llm-top-10/",
            "issuing_body": "OWASP GenAI Security Project",
            "document_title": "2025 Top 10 Risk & Mitigations for LLMs and Gen AI Apps",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2025",
            "lifecycle_state": "PUBLISHED_COMMUNITY_RISK_GUIDANCE",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The official project publishes the 2025 Top 10 across development, deployment, and management lifecycle risks.",
            "does_not_support": "It is not an exhaustive attack catalog, legal mandate, or evidence that every listed risk is present.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 4,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-04",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "2025 Top 10 Risk & Mitigations for LLMs and Gen AI Apps",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The official project publishes the 2025 Top 10 across development, deployment, and management lifecycle risks.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is not an exhaustive attack catalog, legal mandate, or evidence that every listed risk is present.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "31ec2c90ec4eaa82f6bb0c4f007caff0c004c4ad70c79e8bdd1d474ff1a346e8"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-05-OWASP-AGENTIC-2026",
            "query": "OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026",
            "source_url": "https://genai.owasp.org/resource/owasp-top-10-for-agentic-applications-for-2026/",
            "issuing_body": "OWASP GenAI Security Project",
            "document_title": "OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2025-12-09",
            "lifecycle_state": "PUBLISHED_COMMUNITY_FRAMEWORK",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The official OWASP project publishes a peer-reviewed community framework for risks in agentic applications.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not certify a particular agent, prove deployment, or replace system-specific threat modeling.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 5,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-05",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The official OWASP project publishes a peer-reviewed community framework for risks in agentic applications.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not certify a particular agent, prove deployment, or replace system-specific threat modeling.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "12a0583efbe44d715fec6272faadda861e30c3a34ecf4d2afb5a6385bfba735a"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-06-DODD-3000-09",
            "query": "DoD Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems",
            "source_url": "https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/300009p.pdf",
            "issuing_body": "United States Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate",
            "document_title": "DoD Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2023-01-25",
            "lifecycle_state": "CURRENT_LISTED_DOD_DIRECTIVE",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The official directive establishes policy and responsibilities for autonomous and semi-autonomous functions in weapon systems, including testing and human-judgment requirements.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not establish universal international law, prove deployment, prove compliance, or mean every AI-enabled function is an autonomous weapon.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 6,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-06",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "DoD Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The official directive establishes policy and responsibilities for autonomous and semi-autonomous functions in weapon systems, including testing and human-judgment requirements.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not establish universal international law, prove deployment, prove compliance, or mean every AI-enabled function is an autonomous weapon.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "18b9a47a5b77676836778f9e84cf112c4114c07cb4e857d06eeadf1bdedd4d28"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-07-UN-CCW-GGE-2026",
            "query": "Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons — GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems 2026",
            "source_url": "https://meetings.unoda.org/ccw-/convention-on-certain-conventional-weapons-group-of-governmental-experts-on-lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems-2026",
            "issuing_body": "United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs",
            "document_title": "Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons — GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems 2026",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026",
            "lifecycle_state": "ONGOING_INTERGOVERNMENTAL_PROCESS",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The official UNODA meeting record supports that the 2026 GGE process is ongoing.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not establish adoption, signature, ratification, entry into force, universal prohibition, implementation, enforcement, or consensus on every element.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 7,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-07",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons — GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems 2026",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The official UNODA meeting record supports that the 2026 GGE process is ongoing.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not establish adoption, signature, ratification, entry into force, universal prohibition, implementation, enforcement, or consensus on every element.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "5cdb02c6fab0c693506a588d715f6272c3a9f7f038a6d62a40d1bf5223b42ab5"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-08-ICRC-AWS-IHL-2026",
            "query": "Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: Selected Issues",
            "source_url": "https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/autonomous-weapon-systems-and-international-humanitarian-law-selected-issues",
            "issuing_body": "International Committee of the Red Cross",
            "document_title": "Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: Selected Issues",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-01-05",
            "lifecycle_state": "OFFICIAL_POSITION_PAPER",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The ICRC publication explains its legal and humanitarian analysis and contributes to calls for new binding rules.",
            "does_not_support": "It is an institutional position, not an adopted treaty, universal state consensus, or evidence of a specific system’s deployment or legality.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 8,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-08",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: Selected Issues",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The ICRC publication explains its legal and humanitarian analysis and contributes to calls for new binding rules.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is an institutional position, not an adopted treaty, universal state consensus, or evidence of a specific system’s deployment or legality.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "b38e89434988b5a862efb4fe859dddd23012923f875d3873b8cd33818bd28599"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-09-NATO-REVISED-AI-STRATEGY",
            "query": "Summary of NATO’s revised Artificial Intelligence strategy",
            "source_url": "https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2024/07/10/summary-of-natos-revised-artificial-intelligence-ai-strategy",
            "issuing_body": "North Atlantic Treaty Organization",
            "document_title": "Summary of NATO’s revised Artificial Intelligence strategy",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2024-07-10",
            "lifecycle_state": "OFFICIAL_REVISED_STRATEGY",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "NATO’s official summary records six Principles of Responsible Use and implementation priorities.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not prove that every Allied system complies, certify a product, establish universal law, or demonstrate operational effectiveness.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 9,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-09",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "Summary of NATO’s revised Artificial Intelligence strategy",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "NATO’s official summary records six Principles of Responsible Use and implementation priorities.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not prove that every Allied system complies, certify a product, establish universal law, or demonstrate operational effectiveness.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "0fbe53c6cc6ce70c08593faa5bd146338d5d8435b49cd4a218ad30178ed4de77"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-10-EU-AI-TRANSPARENCY-CODE",
            "query": "Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content",
            "source_url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-ai-generated-content",
            "issuing_body": "European Commission, AI Office",
            "document_title": "Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-07",
            "lifecycle_state": "FINAL_VOLUNTARY_CODE_ASSESSED_ADEQUATE_FOR_ARTICLE_50_COMPLIANCE",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The Commission states that the code supports AI Act Article 50 marking and labelling obligations applicable from 2 August 2026 and is a voluntary compliance tool.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not itself prove a provider complies, establish enforcement against a named party, or make every synthetic output truthful.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 10,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-10",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The Commission states that the code supports AI Act Article 50 marking and labelling obligations applicable from 2 August 2026 and is a voluntary compliance tool.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not itself prove a provider complies, establish enforcement against a named party, or make every synthetic output truthful.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "77935eed039c9c6782bf1f74df5f6166f44de61b39c044130b15f8dfaf6e04f6"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-11-W3C-WEBXR-2026",
            "query": "WebXR Device API",
            "source_url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/webxr/",
            "issuing_body": "World Wide Web Consortium",
            "document_title": "WebXR Device API",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-06-09",
            "lifecycle_state": "CANDIDATE_RECOMMENDATION_DRAFT",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "W3C identifies the WebXR Device API as a Candidate Recommendation Draft dated 9 June 2026.",
            "does_not_support": "It is not a final W3C Recommendation, implementation certification, headset-support guarantee, or privacy approval.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 11,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-11",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "WebXR Device API",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "W3C identifies the WebXR Device API as a Candidate Recommendation Draft dated 9 June 2026.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is not a final W3C Recommendation, implementation certification, headset-support guarantee, or privacy approval.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "da0fe3036c8161433adba1698d52ca243c441483d94df01951be94d80330ae2b"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-12-PHP-SUPPORTED-2026",
            "query": "PHP: Supported Versions",
            "source_url": "https://www.php.net/supported-versions.php",
            "issuing_body": "PHP Project",
            "document_title": "PHP: Supported Versions",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-07-31",
            "lifecycle_state": "OFFICIAL_SUPPORT_LIFECYCLE_LISTING",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The official page lists PHP 8.2 through 8.5 support windows, with 8.4 and 8.5 in active support on the access date.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not certify this application, guarantee distribution patch status, or authorize production deployment.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 12,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-12",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "PHP: Supported Versions",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The official page lists PHP 8.2 through 8.5 support windows, with 8.4 and 8.5 in active support on the access date.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not certify this application, guarantee distribution patch status, or authorize production deployment.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "66db135ee927adee9a262885f45e63682773bef93d43a275a2c5bac5c62615ae"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-13-W3C-WCAG22",
            "query": "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2",
            "source_url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/",
            "issuing_body": "World Wide Web Consortium",
            "document_title": "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2024-12-12",
            "lifecycle_state": "W3C_RECOMMENDATION",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "W3C identifies WCAG 2.2 as a Recommendation and states that its criteria address a broad range of accessibility needs.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not satisfy every disability need or constitute human accessibility or comprehension certification for this site.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 13,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-13",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "W3C identifies WCAG 2.2 as a Recommendation and states that its criteria address a broad range of accessibility needs.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not satisfy every disability need or constitute human accessibility or comprehension certification for this site.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "0f726e271626e3eaec256ec7cdf1956959b48aeeccd13c10d12a8f0ae16c843f"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-14-W3C-WCAG3",
            "query": "W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0",
            "source_url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/",
            "issuing_body": "World Wide Web Consortium",
            "document_title": "W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-03-03",
            "lifecycle_state": "WORKING_DRAFT",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "W3C identifies WCAG 3.0 as a Working Draft.",
            "does_not_support": "It is not a Recommendation, legal conformance baseline, production certification, or replacement for WCAG 2.2.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 14,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-14",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "W3C identifies WCAG 3.0 as a Working Draft.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is not a Recommendation, legal conformance baseline, production certification, or replacement for WCAG 2.2.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "c96c088e0df1e95a73a06c005eeca200cf3ce62f109756463eadcef635445fe3"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-15-RFC-8785",
            "query": "RFC 8785: JSON Canonicalization Scheme (JCS)",
            "source_url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8785/",
            "issuing_body": "RFC Editor",
            "document_title": "RFC 8785: JSON Canonicalization Scheme (JCS)",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2020-06",
            "lifecycle_state": "INFORMATIONAL_RFC",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_PUBLISHER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The RFC Editor identifies RFC 8785 as an Informational RFC describing JSON canonicalization.",
            "does_not_support": "Canonicalization does not prove truth, endorsement, confidentiality, signature validity, or production trust.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Official page scope and access-date snapshot; downstream implementation and field practice require separate attributable evidence.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "PUBLICATION_IS_IMPLEMENTATION",
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "GUIDANCE_IS_CERTIFICATION",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "TECHNICAL_STATUS_IS_OPERATIONAL_EFFECTIVENESS"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, lifecycle-stage change, or material source update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or the source is withdrawn/superseded.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "APPEND_ONLY_SUCCESSOR_TO_CURRENTNESS_V14",
            "number": 15,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-15",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "RFC 8785: JSON Canonicalization Scheme (JCS)",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The RFC Editor identifies RFC 8785 as an Informational RFC describing JSON canonicalization.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "Canonicalization does not prove truth, endorsement, confidentiality, signature validity, or production trust.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid or signature-valid is not endorsed. A compatibility transform, aggregate request, parser success, cache state, ETag, synthetic fixture, or test signature is not proof of consumer migration, correction acceptance, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, or endorsement.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "9018e9f6a0bd91ba67443a124dff500a99f6eef624f0b678348ae8d97871153e"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-16-DOD-DIRECTIVE-3000-09",
            "query": "DoD Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems",
            "source_url": "https://media.defense.gov/2023/Jan/25/2003149928/-1/-1/0/DOD-DIRECTIVE-3000.09-AUTONOMY-IN-WEAPON-SYSTEMS.PDF",
            "issuing_body": "United States Department of Defense",
            "document_title": "DoD Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2023-01-25",
            "lifecycle_state": "CURRENT_DEPARTMENT_POLICY",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_ISSUER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The directive documents U.S. Department of Defense policy, responsibilities, review, testing, and appropriate-human-judgment requirements for covered systems.",
            "does_not_support": "It does not prove that a specific system is fielded, compliant, effective, lawful in every use, or accepted as a universal standard.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Public official-source scope; classified implementation, operational settings, and field outcomes remain outside the record.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "DISCUSSION_IS_CONSENSUS",
                "PUBLICATION_IS_COMPLIANCE",
                "TECHNICAL_CAPABILITY_IS_LAWFUL_USE"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, withdrawal, lifecycle change, or material update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or materially changes the lifecycle state.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "NEW_WIP72_OFFICIAL_PRIMARY_SOURCE_RECORD",
            "number": 16,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-16",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "DoD Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The directive documents U.S. Department of Defense policy, responsibilities, review, testing, and appropriate-human-judgment requirements for covered systems.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It does not prove that a specific system is fielded, compliant, effective, lawful in every use, or accepted as a universal standard.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid, parser-valid, hash-valid, signature-valid, quarantine-passed, or fixture-valid is not endorsed or adjudicated. A declared capability, conformance test, observed request, cache response, synthetic receipt, or replay is not proof of production migration, accepted correction, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, legality, or consensus.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "27fe14250c991ea62dd42467fded42846fcaa811f260f06aa33b19472a1a17cc"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-17-ICRC-AWS-IHL-SELECTED-ISSUES",
            "query": "Autonomous weapon systems and international humanitarian law: selected issues",
            "source_url": "https://www.icrc.org/en/article/autonomous-weapon-systems-and-international-humanitarian-law-selected-issues",
            "issuing_body": "International Committee of the Red Cross",
            "document_title": "Autonomous weapon systems and international humanitarian law: selected issues",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-04-01",
            "lifecycle_state": "INSTITUTIONAL_LEGAL_POSITION_AND_ANALYSIS",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_ISSUER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The ICRC records its legal analysis and position on autonomous weapon systems, human judgment, predictability, and restrictions.",
            "does_not_support": "It is not an adopted treaty, proof of state consensus, or a determination about a particular operation.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Public official-source scope; classified implementation, operational settings, and field outcomes remain outside the record.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "DISCUSSION_IS_CONSENSUS",
                "PUBLICATION_IS_COMPLIANCE",
                "TECHNICAL_CAPABILITY_IS_LAWFUL_USE"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, withdrawal, lifecycle change, or material update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or materially changes the lifecycle state.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "NEW_WIP72_OFFICIAL_PRIMARY_SOURCE_RECORD",
            "number": 17,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-17",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "Autonomous weapon systems and international humanitarian law: selected issues",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The ICRC records its legal analysis and position on autonomous weapon systems, human judgment, predictability, and restrictions.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is not an adopted treaty, proof of state consensus, or a determination about a particular operation.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid, parser-valid, hash-valid, signature-valid, quarantine-passed, or fixture-valid is not endorsed or adjudicated. A declared capability, conformance test, observed request, cache response, synthetic receipt, or replay is not proof of production migration, accepted correction, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, legality, or consensus.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "4ed636212b21d9235c9879673159d8bfd65d99fb76aebcaa3ea6496cb5a37b07"
        },
        {
            "id": "CURRENT-72-18-UNODA-CCW-GGE-2026-CHAIR-SUMMARY",
            "query": "CCW GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems 2026 Chair summary",
            "source_url": "https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-Group_of_Governmental_Experts_on_Lethal_Autonomous_Weapons_Systems_%282026%29/CCW-GGE.1-2026-WP.2.pdf",
            "issuing_body": "United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs / CCW GGE Chair",
            "document_title": "CCW GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems 2026 Chair summary",
            "publication_or_update_date": "2026-03-06",
            "lifecycle_state": "CHAIR_SUMMARY_OF_MARCH_2026_GGE_SESSION",
            "jurisdiction": "INTERNATIONAL_OR_ISSUER_SPECIFIC",
            "supported_status": "The document records the March 2026 GGE discussion and mandate-related work on possible elements of an instrument without prejudging its nature.",
            "does_not_support": "It is not an adopted treaty, negotiated consensus text, ratification, entry into force, or proof of national implementation.",
            "known_blind_spot": "Public official-source scope; classified implementation, operational settings, and field outcomes remain outside the record.",
            "dependent_claim_ids": [],
            "prohibited_inference": [
                "POLICY_IS_DEPLOYMENT",
                "POSITION_IS_TREATY",
                "DISCUSSION_IS_CONSENSUS",
                "PUBLICATION_IS_COMPLIANCE",
                "TECHNICAL_CAPABILITY_IS_LAWFUL_USE"
            ],
            "correction_trigger": "Official correction, supersession, withdrawal, lifecycle change, or material update.",
            "reopening_trigger": "New official evidence contradicts the bounded status or materially changes the lifecycle state.",
            "prior_version_relationship": "NEW_WIP72_OFFICIAL_PRIMARY_SOURCE_RECORD",
            "number": 18,
            "search_id": "CURRENTNESS-SEARCH-72-18",
            "search_version": 15,
            "version": 15,
            "exact_query": "CCW GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems 2026 Chair summary",
            "access_date": "2026-08-01",
            "checked_at_utc": "2026-08-01T17:45:00Z",
            "exact_status_supported": "The document records the March 2026 GGE discussion and mandate-related work on possible elements of an instrument without prejudging its nature.",
            "what_source_does_not_support": "It is not an adopted treaty, negotiated consensus text, ratification, entry into force, or proof of national implementation.",
            "result": "RETRIEVED",
            "status": "RETRIEVED",
            "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid, parser-valid, hash-valid, signature-valid, quarantine-passed, or fixture-valid is not endorsed or adjudicated. A declared capability, conformance test, observed request, cache response, synthetic receipt, or replay is not proof of production migration, accepted correction, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, legality, or consensus.",
            "record_digest_sha256": "0c164ad1f0a3c29324622567d804bf5dfcd21dec7fb46fbce819bb30cb9bd54d"
        }
    ],
    "private_fields_excluded": true,
    "protected_paths_excluded": true,
    "source_boundary": "WIP.40 baseline + exact available WIP.42 source-recovery delta + retained WIP.43 through WIP.72 increments. The complete WIP.41 archive remains unavailable; no absent WIP.41 bytes are inferred or manufactured.",
    "boundary": "Prepared for review is not reviewed. Submitted is not accepted. Schema-valid, parser-valid, hash-valid, signature-valid, quarantine-passed, or fixture-valid is not endorsed or adjudicated. A declared capability, conformance test, observed request, cache response, synthetic receipt, or replay is not proof of production migration, accepted correction, external repair, human comprehension, deployment, effectiveness, legality, or consensus.",
    "consumer_migration_state": "ZERO_ATTRIBUTABLE_PRODUCTION_MIGRATIONS",
    "real_consumer_migration_count": 0,
    "evidence_import_state": "ZERO_REAL_SUBMISSIONS",
    "export_digest_sha256": "205fc7c5e4e74b992be09a55c008dee310812b949d41e7af1b963b0a184683bd"
}
