REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
One-sentence brief
Feeding an entire creator dossier into every interaction increases cost, prompt leakage, identity drift, stale context, and accidental exposure of administrative instructions.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
AI-DRIVEN WORLD SAFETY
Creator Artifact, Runtime Projection, and Scene State
A four-part architecture that separates complete authoring evidence from a compact accepted character projection, volatile scene state, and turn-specific retrieved memory.
LEVEL 1
ORIENTATION
Why this matters
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Three key points
- The creator artifact is not runtime context.
- The accepted projection holds stable identity and behavior.
- Scene state and retrieved memory are bounded and replaceable.
LEVEL 2
WORKING BRIEF
Evidence, context, and limits
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Complete creator artifact
Store research provenance, raw prompts, discarded drafts, editorial controls, validation evidence, export metadata, and complete dossier material in the authoring environment. Keep it private and non-runtime.
- Administrative instructions never enter character dialogue.
- Creator evidence can be larger and more sensitive.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Activation-oriented projection
Create a compact, immutable, human-reviewed semantic backbone containing identity, concise causal biography, ordinary-life continuity, relationships, goals, dialogue tendencies, emotional baseline, knowledge and privacy boundaries, and runtime guidance.
- Fingerprint the exact projection.
- Do not include volatile scene details.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Scene-state packet
Pass current location, participants, events, injuries, inventory, objectives, and other immediate engine facts in a separate packet that expires or changes with the scene.
- Scene state has precedence for current observation.
- Do not write transient objectives into identity.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Memory-retrieval packet
Retrieve only the small set of relevant, permitted, current memories needed for this turn. Include provenance, confidence, privacy, revision, and contradiction state.
- Retrieval is not the complete history.
- Stale or superseded memories are excluded.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Compose context by allowlist
Construct live context from the accepted projection, current scene packet, allowed memories, recent dialogue, and explicit runtime policy. Exclude rejected revisions, review notes, provider evidence, hidden prompts, and unrelated data.
- Log component versions.
- Fail closed when identity or authority is ambiguous.
LEVEL 3
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Limitations, game links, and review context
DISPUTED / MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS
Known limitations and gaps
- The six supplied reports are preserved research leads. Their filenames, organizations, citations, examples, thresholds, and technical detail do not authenticate authorship, sponsorship, product status, or current factual accuracy.
- The public section is design literacy, not a production specification. It does not expose provider credentials, prompts, live endpoints, activation tokens, autonomous tool use, or implementation code for a running agent system.
- Population-quality measures must detect mechanical repetition and coherence failures without treating demographic rarity, disability, nationality, language, religion, gender, migration, or another protected characteristic as a defect or quality score.
- Thresholds, similarity methods, sampling plans, language rules, and runtime budgets require representative testing, privacy review, accessibility review, cultural and linguistic review, security review, and accountable human approval before any production use.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Related public learning
- Human and NPC psychologyKeep personhood, role, state, relationships, pressure, and recovery separate.
- Deterministic core and generative narrativeKeep validated state authoritative while generation remains bounded and correctable.
- Virtual-world governanceConnect AI design to consent, justice, accessibility, and repair.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Glossary cross-reference
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Decision matrix
| Artifact | Update rate | Runtime role |
|---|---|---|
| Creator artifact | Authoring lifecycle | Never directly injected |
| Accepted projection | Only after review and new fingerprint | Stable identity and behavioral constraints |
| Scene-state packet | Per event or turn | Current physical and engine facts |
| Memory-retrieval packet | Per turn | Relevant historical context within privacy rules |
| Recent dialogue | Per turn, bounded | Local conversational continuity |
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Publication audit checklist
Identity and agency
Does the design preserve the exact fictional identity, ordinary life, independent goals, and ability to refuse rather than reducing the character to a role or prompt?
Pass condition: Identity fields are stable, state is separate, protected traits are not quality scores, and silent substitution is impossible.
Evidence and review
Can every transition, validation result, accepted fingerprint, exception, and human decision be traced to a versioned record?
Pass condition: Automated checks, human review, activation authority, and production approval remain separate and explicit.
Runtime boundary
Can untrusted provider output, administrative evidence, stale revisions, or private data enter live context or binding state?
Pass condition: Only allowlisted, current, reviewed projections and bounded scene or memory packets can be used; failures degrade safely.
Correction and retirement
Can a changed source, identity revision, harmful behavior, or failed review invalidate downstream use without destroying audit history?
Pass condition: Supersession, pause, rollback, correction, and permanent retirement are defined and testable.
LEVEL 4
RESEARCH EDITION
Sources, methods, and stable links
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Linked reports
- Method: Transparent, Revisable, and Explicitly LimitedComplete public report · 533 words
-
Human and NPC Psychology: Person, Role, State, and AgencyProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
- Intelligence Ethics: Necessity, Proportionality, and Human ConsequenceComplete public report · 513 words
REAL-WORLD VERIFIED
Method and corrections
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
NEXT
CONTINUE
Related learning
AI-Driven World SafetyAI Mission Generation: Reliability, Verification, and Fail-ForwardA mission pipeline in which generative systems propose bounded narrative variations while deterministic validators ensure that objectives, locations, rewards, permissions, and exits are real.AI-Driven World SafetyAI NPC Cost, Latency, and Graceful DegradationA bounded architecture for generative characters that protects budget, responsiveness, privacy, and authoritative game state under normal play, spikes, outages, and abuse.AI-Driven World SafetyAI NPC Identity, Consent, Memory, and ProvenanceA clear boundary for AI-driven characters: players know when generative systems are involved, what data is used, what the NPC remembers, and which outputs can change game state.AI-Driven World SafetyBatch Correlation, Ordering, Idempotency, and RetryA deterministic transport contract that maps every character response to one request, preserves order, handles retries safely, and keeps identity separate from network metadata. Learning pathRuntime Projection, Memory, and ReliabilityKeep creator evidence, accepted projections, scene state, memory, prompt context, budgets, fallbacks, identity, and incident response separate.