One-sentence brief
The site contains real-world education, editorial interpretation, lived-experience descriptions, clinical education, historical cases, fictional records, and game mechanics. Those categories must never be silently blended.
ORIENTATION
An orientation to the companion: how to read claims, distinguish fiction from evidence, and move between learning pages and RogueIntelligence.org dossiers.
ORIENTATION
The site contains real-world education, editorial interpretation, lived-experience descriptions, clinical education, historical cases, fictional records, and game mechanics. Those categories must never be silently blended.
WORKING BRIEF
PsychologicalWar.org is an educational companion dossier about intelligence, evidence, influence, operational psychology, and human experience. It does not teach real-world covert action, diagnose people, or provide instructions for harming, manipulating, tracking, or evading anyone.
Begin with the provenance label. Then check date, confidence, source count, corroboration, jurisdiction, and review status. A character statement is a statement; an institutional note is an institutional note; an editorial synthesis is an interpretation. None becomes omniscient truth because it appears in dossier typography.
New visitors can follow a learning path, read the intelligence cycle, open the mental-health center, or try the Evidence Lab. Players can enter operations and dossiers after learning the same evidence rules used to interpret them.
The Shadow Chorus case provides a guided first exercise in separating role, access, loyalty, state, and evidence.
Do not use the site to diagnose, surveil, test, expose, recruit, or profile a real person. When someone may be in immediate danger, respond to direct safety signals and seek appropriate local help rather than inferring risk from a diagnosis or unusual belief.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE