Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

INTERNATIONAL SIMULATION LITERACY

International Simulation Literacy

A worldwide method for comparing model claims without treating one country, language, data infrastructure, or institutional form as the universal baseline.

Read the working brief Choose a learning path
LEVEL 1

ORIENTATION

Why this matters

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

One-sentence brief

Global simulations inherit unequal data, connectivity, legal definitions, reporting systems, resources, and histories. Fairness requires exposing those differences rather than scoring countries by how well they fit one model.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Three key points

  1. Equal method does not require identical models or identical evidence.
  2. Missing data and low publication are not proof of absence or poor performance.
  3. Local-language, regional, accessibility, rights, and correction review are part of model validity.
LEVEL 2

WORKING BRIEF

Evidence, context, and limits

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Equal analytical method

Ask the same questions everywhere: purpose, authority, unit, data, missingness, assumptions, validation, uncertainty, consequences, rights, and correction. Preserve different answers rather than forcing equivalence.

  • No country ranking.
  • No major-power default.
  • No institutional stereotype.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Unequal data environments

Census intervals, mapping coverage, health reporting, internet access, administrative records, and open-data practice vary. The amount of data available is not the same as the amount of underlying activity.

  • Evidence volume is not quality.
  • Opacity is not competence.
  • Transparency is not failure.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Local terminology and legal categories

A category such as household, case, urban, service access, migration, or administrative region may not transfer cleanly across languages and institutions.

  • Preserve native terms.
  • Document translation choices.
  • Do not harmonize away legal differences.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Infrastructure and access

Time zone, latency, device, bandwidth, power stability, accessibility, transport, and service capacity can influence exposure to a system without describing personal character.

  • Model infrastructure causally.
  • Do not infer honesty or competence.
  • Provide equivalent low-bandwidth access.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Rights and remedy

A model used for consequential decisions should expose appeal, correction, explanation, data access, and remedy under the relevant jurisdiction. Formal rights and practical access must remain distinct.

  • No automated guilt or eligibility.
  • Independent review.
  • Derivative record repair.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Regional and lived-experience review

Local experts and affected communities can identify category errors, language mistakes, implausible assumptions, and missing harms that a global technical team overlooks.

  • Pay reviewers where possible.
  • Record disagreement.
  • Keep publication status pending until evidence is adequate.
LEVEL 3

COMPLETE DOSSIER

Limitations, game links, and review context

DISPUTED / MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS

Known limitations and gaps

  • This is a non-operational educational transformation: it does not build or implement a game, executable simulator, forecasting service, emergency tool, or decision system.
  • This page is an educational transformation of supplied research leads; it does not authenticate every citation, equation, product claim, or institutional attribution in those files.
  • A scenario, model run, or map is not an observation, forecast, legal finding, public-health instruction, emergency warning, or proof of future behavior.
  • No source code, nuclear-effects formula, casualty calculation, target-selection method, cyber-intrusion procedure, exploit chain, or instruction for bypassing safeguards is published.
  • Geography, nationality, ethnicity, religion, language, migration, disability, health, poverty, or political identity are not inherent danger, compliance, intelligence, competence, or worth variables.
  • Specialist scientific, public-health, accessibility, legal, regional, ethics, security, and lived-experience review remains pending; the page stays open to correction.
LEVEL 4

RESEARCH EDITION

Sources, methods, and stable links

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Linked reports

  • Building Epidemiological ModelsProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
  • AI Takeover Simulation MapProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
  • IARPA SimEarth Game Architecture part 2Protected research reference; no public report route in this release.
  • IARPA SimEarth Game ArchitectureProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
  • IARPA Simulation Game ArchitectureProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
  • Planetary Simulation Game ArchitectureProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
REAL-WORLD VERIFIED

Method and corrections

This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.

Read the methodView corrections
NEXT

CONTINUE

Related learning

International Simulation LiteracyData Gaps, Model Transfer, and FairnessHow missing records, changing definitions, language coverage, infrastructure differences, and calibration context limit international model transfer.International Simulation LiteracyModel Governance, Correction, and Public AccountabilityA rights-aware lifecycle for consequential models: ownership, purpose, source review, validation, publication, monitoring, challenge, correction, withdrawal, and archival history.International Simulation LiteracyResearch Affiliation and Source AuthenticationHow to distinguish a user-supplied report, an institutional reference, an official publication, a verified source identity, and an endorsement claim. Learning pathInternational Simulation Fairness and AccountabilityStudy model transfer, data gaps, local terminology, low-bandwidth access, event history, public accountability, and source authentication across unequal international evidence environments.