One-sentence brief
Unlimited transcript replay produces cost, context rot, privacy exposure, and identity drift. A selective memory system should preserve continuity without pretending that every line is equally important or permanently available.
AI-DRIVEN WORLD SAFETY
A bounded memory model with stable IDs, event and learned dates, provenance, confidence, privacy, revision, contradiction, retrieval, and correction.
ORIENTATION
Unlimited transcript replay produces cost, context rot, privacy exposure, and identity drift. A selective memory system should preserve continuity without pretending that every line is equally important or permanently available.
WORKING BRIEF
Create a small set of autobiographical, relationship, commitment, preference, world-fact, rumor, emotional, scene, correction, and future-intention memories with stable IDs and provenance.
A character may learn about an earlier event later. Store both the time of the event and the time and source of acquisition to support chronology and knowledge access.
Rank eligible memories by relevance to the current input and scene, recency, importance, relationship, privacy, and contradiction state. Apply diversity and recency constraints so one theme does not dominate every turn.
When a memory is disproven or refined, create a correction or new revision and point the old record to its supersessor. Runtime uses the current record while audit retains the earlier belief.
Some scene details can decay; commitments, core relationships, and high-impact events may persist. Retrieval policy should not simulate disability, trauma, or cognitive impairment through stereotypes.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
| Memory state | Retrieve? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Current, relevant, permitted | Yes, within budget | Supports continuity |
| Private from current participant | No | Knowledge and disclosure boundary |
| Superseded or disproven | No; retrieve correction instead | Avoid stale belief as current fact |
| Low-confidence rumor | Maybe, labeled | Character may discuss uncertainty |
| Administrative review note | Never | Not character memory |
Does the design preserve the exact fictional identity, ordinary life, independent goals, and ability to refuse rather than reducing the character to a role or prompt?
Pass condition: Identity fields are stable, state is separate, protected traits are not quality scores, and silent substitution is impossible.
Can every transition, validation result, accepted fingerprint, exception, and human decision be traced to a versioned record?
Pass condition: Automated checks, human review, activation authority, and production approval remain separate and explicit.
Can untrusted provider output, administrative evidence, stale revisions, or private data enter live context or binding state?
Pass condition: Only allowlisted, current, reviewed projections and bounded scene or memory packets can be used; failures degrade safely.
Can a changed source, identity revision, harmful behavior, or failed review invalidate downstream use without destroying audit history?
Pass condition: Supersession, pause, rollback, correction, and permanent retirement are defined and testable.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE