One-sentence brief
A population can be demographically varied yet narratively identical, or share world-specific vocabulary while remaining meaningfully distinct. The review method must detect both collapse and false positives.
AI-DRIVEN WORLD SAFETY
A batch-level view of whether a cast is genuinely distinct or merely a small set of narrative and behavioral templates with substituted surface traits.
ORIENTATION
A population can be demographically varied yet narratively identical, or share world-specific vocabulary while remaining meaningfully distinct. The review method must detect both collapse and false positives.
WORKING BRIEF
Different names, ages, locations, and occupations do not prove diversity when biographies share the same causal chain, dialogue openings, goals, relationship topology, and emotional recovery.
Cluster normalized biographies, dialogue acts, goal sets, relationship graphs, and event chains to find dominant families. Report family size, share, representative structure, and uncertainty rather than presenting a mysterious single score.
Characters in the same occupation or faction may share vocabulary, procedures, and constraints. They should still differ in ordinary life, history, relationships, values, refusals, humor, and responses to pressure.
Normalization should replace names and incidental numbers but should not erase relationship type, goals, fears, privacy, behavioral triggers, or other meaningful distinctions.
A batch may be rejected when systemic duplication exceeds the documented profile even if every record passes schema. Borderline cases should generate a stratified sample for human narrative review.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
| Dimension | Mechanical variation | Meaningful variation |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | Swapped names or ages | Coherent life histories and self-concepts |
| Biography | Different nouns in the same skeleton | Different causal structure, pacing, and turning points |
| Dialogue | Synonym substitution | Different pragmatics, rhythm, uncertainty, refusal, and repair |
| Relationships | Different IDs in the same graph | Different history, power, obligation, conflict, and knowledge boundaries |
| Ordinary life | Random hobby slot | Situated routines, constraints, objects, commitments, and future intentions |
Does the design preserve the exact fictional identity, ordinary life, independent goals, and ability to refuse rather than reducing the character to a role or prompt?
Pass condition: Identity fields are stable, state is separate, protected traits are not quality scores, and silent substitution is impossible.
Can every transition, validation result, accepted fingerprint, exception, and human decision be traced to a versioned record?
Pass condition: Automated checks, human review, activation authority, and production approval remain separate and explicit.
Can untrusted provider output, administrative evidence, stale revisions, or private data enter live context or binding state?
Pass condition: Only allowlisted, current, reviewed projections and bounded scene or memory packets can be used; failures degrade safely.
Can a changed source, identity revision, harmful behavior, or failed review invalidate downstream use without destroying audit history?
Pass condition: Supersession, pause, rollback, correction, and permanent retirement are defined and testable.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE