PUBLIC VOCABULARY
Definitions used across intelligence literacy, evidence, oversight, influence, identity, mental health, personas, and game mechanics. A definition explains site usage; it does not replace jurisdiction-specific law or individual clinical assessment.
8 terms shown.
A statement of decisions that a reviewer may and may not make, including whether the review can recommend wording, require correction, advise procedure, or grant no publication, legal, accessibility, activation, production, or tuning approval.
#A record of relationships, funding, employment, representation, advocacy, personal involvement, or other material incentives that may affect a reviewer’s independence or require limitation or recusal.
#A bounded instruction identifying the exact wording, route, protected record, visibility, owner role, response, accessibility, language, validation, and reopening work required by an evidence-linked disposition.
#A versioned inventory of the exact documents, translations, excerpts, interviews, negative searches, and exclusions actually considered by a reviewer.
#A record of reviewer selection, compensation, evidence access, communication rights, and freedom to narrow, decline, or recuse, kept separate from prestige or institutional title.
#The explicit domain, jurisdiction, time period, evidence revision, question set, and authority boundary covered by a specialist assignment or disposition.
#A claim-specific outcome such as retain, qualify, narrow, correct, supersede, defer, cannot determine, outside scope, or recuse, with rationale and authority boundaries.
#A version-bound bundle for one proposition containing its current wording, evidence origins, gaps, review questions, rights considerations, affected routes, assignment scope, empty disposition fields, and reopening triggers.
#