Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.
FICTIONAL ROGUEINTELLIGENCE.ORG

DIRECTIONAL RELATIONSHIP HISTORY

Darius Cole Vivian Locke

Believes Locke authorized his disavowal

Darius Cole continuityVivian Locke continuity
DirectionBLAMES
Strength84%
Confidence92%
Source setInstitutional
GAME MECHANIC
Direction is not reciprocity.

Darius Cole’s trust, protection, suspicion, fear, dependence, or manipulation does not prove that Vivian Locke names or experiences the relationship the same way. Strength is an authored navigation coordinate, not affection, ownership, consent, or compatibility.

FICTIONAL ROGUEINTELLIGENCE.ORG

RELATIONSHIP HISTORY

3 visible events trace formation, pressure, rupture, and repair.

Each event preserves both interpretations, changes in power and knowledge, and the specific domain of trust affected.

  1. 01
    FORMATION

    First meaningful contact

    Darius Cole first treated Vivian Locke as more than a role when believes Locke authorized his disavowal became practically relevant.

    Darius Cole’s interpretation

    Darius Cole understood the contact through demands concrete commitments and tests them with low-value disclosures.

    Vivian Locke’s interpretation

    Vivian Locke interpreted the same contact through that suffering is random and her sacrifices purchased no durable order and their own need for control that can be remembered as stewardship.

    Trust change
    Formation
    Power change
    Power remains directional and must be read from role, access, consent, and the recorded event.
    Knowledge change
    Darius Cole first treated Vivian Locke as more than a role when believes Locke authorized his disavowal became practically relevant.
    Rupture / repair
    Open / source-bounded
  2. 02
    OPERATIONAL PRESSURE · directive-73-alpha

    Directive 73-Alpha

    Relationship strength is directional and source-specific; it does not imply reciprocity. During Directive 73-Alpha, the same relationship carried operational consequences.

    Darius Cole’s interpretation

    Darius Cole experienced the relationship as believes locke authorized his disavowal.

    Vivian Locke’s interpretation

    Vivian Locke may not have understood or reciprocated that meaning; direction remains explicit.

    Trust change
    Operational pressure
    Power change
    Power remains directional and must be read from role, access, consent, and the recorded event.
    Knowledge change
    Relationship strength is directional and source-specific; it does not imply reciprocity. During Directive 73-Alpha, the same relationship carried operational consequences.
    Rupture / repair
    Open / source-bounded
  3. 03
    AFTERMATH · directive-73-alpha

    Repair, refusal, or unresolved asymmetry

    Repair requires consent, specific evidence, and acknowledgment that the two people may understand the bond differently.

    Darius Cole’s interpretation

    Darius Cole must decide whether the relationship can survive without certainty or control.

    Vivian Locke’s interpretation

    Vivian Locke retains the right to refuse repair, redefine the bond, or leave it unresolved.

    Trust change
    Aftermath
    Power change
    Power remains directional and must be read from role, access, consent, and the recorded event.
    Knowledge change
    Repair requires consent, specific evidence, and acknowledgment that the two people may understand the bond differently.
    Rupture / repair
    Open / source-bounded