REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
One-sentence brief
Combining administrative evidence with runtime identity makes it difficult to know what was reviewed, what the player sees, and which data a model can access.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
AI-DRIVEN WORLD SAFETY
Provider Evidence, Accepted Personas, and Activation Records
Why raw provider transactions, reviewed character projections, world authorization, and live-session evidence must be stored as different records.
LEVEL 1
ORIENTATION
Why this matters
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Three key points
- Provider evidence is immutable and untrusted.
- The accepted persona is the exact reviewed projection.
- The activation record supplies world context without rewriting identity.
LEVEL 2
WORKING BRIEF
Evidence, context, and limits
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Provider-evidence record
Capture the exact request and raw response, provider and model identifiers, timestamps, transport status, schema version, canonical content hash, and evidence location. This is an evidence vault, not a runtime candidate.
- Do not merge into the character automatically.
- Do not expose administrative evidence to players or models.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Accepted-persona record
After automated checks and human review, store the exact accepted projection and its immutable runtime fingerprint. Reviewer scope and date belong to the acceptance evidence, not to the character’s spoken identity.
- Acceptance binds one exact revision.
- Any semantic change creates a new fingerprint.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Activation record
Bind the accepted fingerprint to a fictional world, placement, controller type, runtime policy, memory namespace, and activation authority. The record should be invalid if the accepted fingerprint changes.
- World placement is not core identity.
- Controller disclosure remains visible.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Live-session record
Record session start, active fingerprint, runtime policy version, bounded context references, provider routing, pause or failure events, and closure. Do not store unnecessary full transcripts by default.
- Session evidence supports audit and correction.
- Retention follows privacy policy.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Lineage and supersession
Every record points backward to the evidence that created it and forward to any superseding revision. Source bytes, acceptance decisions, and old fingerprints remain auditable even after live eligibility ends.
- Revision history is append-only.
- Runtime reads only the current accepted lineage.
LEVEL 3
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Limitations, game links, and review context
DISPUTED / MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS
Known limitations and gaps
- The six supplied reports are preserved research leads. Their filenames, organizations, citations, examples, thresholds, and technical detail do not authenticate authorship, sponsorship, product status, or current factual accuracy.
- The public section is design literacy, not a production specification. It does not expose provider credentials, prompts, live endpoints, activation tokens, autonomous tool use, or implementation code for a running agent system.
- Population-quality measures must detect mechanical repetition and coherence failures without treating demographic rarity, disability, nationality, language, religion, gender, migration, or another protected characteristic as a defect or quality score.
- Thresholds, similarity methods, sampling plans, language rules, and runtime budgets require representative testing, privacy review, accessibility review, cultural and linguistic review, security review, and accountable human approval before any production use.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Related public learning
- Human and NPC psychologyKeep personhood, role, state, relationships, pressure, and recovery separate.
- Deterministic core and generative narrativeKeep validated state authoritative while generation remains bounded and correctable.
- Virtual-world governanceConnect AI design to consent, justice, accessibility, and repair.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Glossary cross-reference
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Decision matrix
| Record | Contains | Must never contain or imply |
|---|---|---|
| Creator artifact | Authoring notes, research provenance, raw prompts, editorial controls | Automatic runtime authority |
| Provider evidence | Exact request/response and integrity metadata | Human acceptance |
| Accepted persona | Reviewed identity and behavioral projection | Volatile scene state |
| Activation record | World binding, controller disclosure, memory namespace | A rewritten persona |
| Live session | Current revision and bounded operational evidence | Stale or rejected revisions |
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Publication audit checklist
Identity and agency
Does the design preserve the exact fictional identity, ordinary life, independent goals, and ability to refuse rather than reducing the character to a role or prompt?
Pass condition: Identity fields are stable, state is separate, protected traits are not quality scores, and silent substitution is impossible.
Evidence and review
Can every transition, validation result, accepted fingerprint, exception, and human decision be traced to a versioned record?
Pass condition: Automated checks, human review, activation authority, and production approval remain separate and explicit.
Runtime boundary
Can untrusted provider output, administrative evidence, stale revisions, or private data enter live context or binding state?
Pass condition: Only allowlisted, current, reviewed projections and bounded scene or memory packets can be used; failures degrade safely.
Correction and retirement
Can a changed source, identity revision, harmful behavior, or failed review invalidate downstream use without destroying audit history?
Pass condition: Supersession, pause, rollback, correction, and permanent retirement are defined and testable.
LEVEL 4
RESEARCH EDITION
Sources, methods, and stable links
REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE
Linked reports
- Method: Transparent, Revisable, and Explicitly LimitedComplete public report · 533 words
-
Human and NPC Psychology: Person, Role, State, and AgencyProtected research reference; no public report route in this release.
- Intelligence Ethics: Necessity, Proportionality, and Human ConsequenceComplete public report · 513 words
REAL-WORLD VERIFIED
Method and corrections
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
NEXT
CONTINUE
Related learning
AI-Driven World SafetyAI Mission Generation: Reliability, Verification, and Fail-ForwardA mission pipeline in which generative systems propose bounded narrative variations while deterministic validators ensure that objectives, locations, rewards, permissions, and exits are real.AI-Driven World SafetyAI NPC Cost, Latency, and Graceful DegradationA bounded architecture for generative characters that protects budget, responsiveness, privacy, and authoritative game state under normal play, spikes, outages, and abuse.AI-Driven World SafetyAI NPC Identity, Consent, Memory, and ProvenanceA clear boundary for AI-driven characters: players know when generative systems are involved, what data is used, what the NPC remembers, and which outputs can change game state.AI-Driven World SafetyBatch Correlation, Ordering, Idempotency, and RetryA deterministic transport contract that maps every character response to one request, preserves order, handles retries safely, and keeps identity separate from network metadata. Learning pathSafe Synthetic Character LifecycleMove from person-first identity through provider evidence, validation, exact human review, activation boundaries, pause, supersession, and retirement.