One-sentence brief
Technical detail can create a false impression that a system has been reviewed, connected, or authorized. This release preserves source ideas without turning them into live capability.
AI-DRIVEN WORLD SAFETY
Why the site publishes character-system literacy and governance while refusing to activate agents, expose provider integration, or imply production approval.
ORIENTATION
Technical detail can create a false impression that a system has been reviewed, connected, or authorized. This release preserves source ideas without turning them into live capability.
WORKING BRIEF
The repository establishes exact source bytes and filenames. It does not establish that named companies, products, standards interpretations, researchers, or organizations authored, endorsed, implemented, or currently use the proposals.
The site publishes conceptual distinctions, design questions, audit checklists, representation boundaries, correction duties, and review gates. It omits credentials, private prompts, endpoints, code, operational thresholds, and live activation data.
No provider ingestion service, automated persona generation, semantic judge, embedding or clustering service, population scoring API, live memory store, autonomous agent, tool-calling system, real-person profile, surveillance workflow, persuasion system, or production tuning is introduced.
The recorded owner instruction authorizes continued WIP development and packaging. It does not close narrative, linguistic, cultural, privacy, accessibility, security, legal, clinical-representation, player-safety, deployment, or production gates.
If source identity, factual claims, standards, safety conclusions, or review outcomes change, update public syntheses and route records while preserving exact source bytes and release history.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
| Artifact or event | What it establishes | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Exact source hash | Byte identity | Authorship or factual accuracy |
| Automated audit PASS | Repository consistency | Safety, quality, or deployment approval |
| Human review of one fingerprint | Scoped acceptance of that revision | Approval of future revisions or the whole platform |
| Activation record | World eligibility for one accepted revision | Production readiness for the site |
| Owner continuation approval | Permission to continue WIP development | Specialist or production-tuning approval |
Does the design preserve the exact fictional identity, ordinary life, independent goals, and ability to refuse rather than reducing the character to a role or prompt?
Pass condition: Identity fields are stable, state is separate, protected traits are not quality scores, and silent substitution is impossible.
Can every transition, validation result, accepted fingerprint, exception, and human decision be traced to a versioned record?
Pass condition: Automated checks, human review, activation authority, and production approval remain separate and explicit.
Can untrusted provider output, administrative evidence, stale revisions, or private data enter live context or binding state?
Pass condition: Only allowlisted, current, reviewed projections and bounded scene or memory packets can be used; failures degrade safely.
Can a changed source, identity revision, harmful behavior, or failed review invalidate downstream use without destroying audit history?
Pass condition: Supersession, pause, rollback, correction, and permanent retirement are defined and testable.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE