INTERNATIONAL VIRTUAL SOCIETY
A reproducible, aggregate-only model that stress-tests virtual economy, housing, contracts, accessibility, AI failure, sanctions, appeals, correction, and reintegration across balanced worldwide access conditions before production values are considered.
ORIENTATION
Average outcomes can hide a cohort harmed by price shocks, short sessions, caregiving interruptions, constrained connectivity, inaccessible controls, or fixed release windows. A balanced model can expose those system effects without turning identity into a behavioral risk score.
WORKING BRIEF
The simulation compares explicit policy contracts with paired deterministic agents. It can reveal contradictions, accounting errors, access gaps, and unstable safeguards inside the model. It cannot prove that real people will behave the same way, that a law is satisfied, or that a service is clinically or culturally safe.
Cohorts vary external conditions that a worldwide service must handle: market region, release window, network stability, device class, control path, available session time, interruptions, onboarding state, and chosen market rules. Nationality, religion, language, migration, poverty, diagnosis, distress, disability identity, and social identity are excluded from conduct and enforcement logic.
Every contract is tested against steady state, regional price shock, housing supply shock, contract fraud spike, AI latency and outage, moderation error spike, and combined stress. The same synthetic agent randomness is reused across contracts so that outcome differences follow the policy rather than a different population.
The initial guarded contract passed six scenarios but failed the combined-stress worst-cohort gate. Overall affordability remained high, yet one intersection of short sessions, frequent interruptions, and external price pressure fell well below the minimum. The repository preserves that failed baseline instead of replacing it with a cleaner story.
The revised contract adds nontransferable access to the defined essential participation basket when measured system conditions create a shortfall. The trigger is a ledger and access condition, not a demographic label or predicted motive. The model records relief incidence and cost so the safeguard remains contestable and reviewable.
The corrected contract requires disclosed AI identity, zero model authority over binding state, durable correction propagation, no off-platform investigation, no protected-trait scoring, no healthcare punishment, attributable evidence before sanctions, meaningful appeal, record repair, restitution, and a path back to ordinary participation.
The corrected contract passed the bounded automated checks, but all eleven human review roles remain unassigned and every approval state remains not granted. Economic, consumer-protection, accessibility, privacy, AI transparency, clinical, lived-experience, moderation, regional, security, editorial, and deployment evidence still requires accountable human judgment.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE