One-sentence brief
A stable event record prevents the interface from silently turning uncertain, partial, or contested material into a single authoritative-looking narrative.
WORLD EVENT LITERACY
A structured schema for documenting an event before it becomes a map, timeline, simulation, article, or social preview.
ORIENTATION
A stable event record prevents the interface from silently turning uncertain, partial, or contested material into a single authoritative-looking narrative.
WORKING BRIEF
Assign a stable event identifier, title, geographic scope, time span, and version. State whether the record describes a discrete occurrence, a process, a campaign, or a later interpretation.
Represent people, populations, institutions, places, and source documents as distinct entities. A government action must not be assigned to a population, and a report about a place must not be treated as the place itself.
Store the narrow claim, source type, publication date, access date, quoted or paraphrased support, confidence, and reviewer. A source can be strong for one statement and weak for another.
Record credible alternatives with their own evidence rather than placing all conflict in one vague disclaimer. Note what evidence would distinguish the accounts.
Mark unknown dates, missing archives, inaccessible language, destroyed files, and absent affected-community testimony. Missing evidence is neither proof of falsity nor permission to interpolate.
Link every map, card, article, video, glossary entry, and learning path back to the event record version. When the record changes, publish the correction cascade rather than silently replacing the old presentation.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
| Field group | Minimum content | Do not infer |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | Stable ID, title, type, scope, version | That a familiar title has one uncontested boundary |
| Time and place | Start/end precision, coordinates or area, uncertainty | Exactness from a visually precise map |
| Entities | People, institutions, populations, documents | Population beliefs from institutional actions |
| Claims | Claim text, source, support, confidence, reviewer | Corroboration from repeated or circular reporting |
| Gaps and disputes | Missing records, credible alternatives, closure evidence | Falsity from absence or consensus from silence |
Can each consequential statement be traced to a dated source or clearly labeled interpretation?
Pass condition: Claims, interpretations, and unresolved gaps are visibly separated.
Does the presentation preserve dignity, agency, privacy, and the difference between institutions and populations?
Pass condition: People are not reduced to risk scores, spectacle, or aggregate stereotypes.
Can a changed source or finding be propagated to every derivative route?
Pass condition: The route has a visible review state, stable identifiers, and correction triggers.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE