One-sentence brief
A story should preserve the same evidence and safety boundaries when it moves across platforms, even though pacing, interaction, and captioning change.
WORLD EVENT LITERACY
A format-neutral framework for short video, animated map, interactive card, comparison slider, timeline thread, short article, classroom prompt, and embeddable visualization.
ORIENTATION
A story should preserve the same evidence and safety boundaries when it moves across platforms, even though pacing, interaction, and captioning change.
WORKING BRIEF
Open with a precise question, surprising relationship, or evidence gap. Do not use fear, certainty, or trauma as the only reason to continue.
Map each beat to a claim and source. Avoid inserting illustrative imagery that could be mistaken for footage of the event.
Write captions that explain the evidence rather than merely repeat narration. Include transcripts, audio description, readable timing, and language access.
Keep source names, dates, links, and status visible in the format or immediately adjacent. A closing bibliography alone may be insufficient for fast-moving media.
Cards need keyboard states, sliders need numeric controls, maps need tables, videos need captions and description, and classroom prompts need multiple downloadable forms.
Every share should return to a stable event record with full sources, corrections, and limitations. Do not direct readers only to a generic home page.
COMPLETE DOSSIER
Terms are defined for this site’s evidence method, not as universal legal or clinical definitions.
| Format | Best use | Must include |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical video | One narrow question and sequence | Captions, audio description, persistent source cue |
| Animated map clip | Spatial progression | Timestamp, uncertainty, static alternative |
| Interactive card | One comparison or reveal | Keyboard operation, visible state, non-hover access |
| Comparison slider | Aligned visual states | Numeric controls and paired descriptions |
| Timeline thread | Stepwise chronology | Elapsed-time gaps and source per node |
| Short article | Context and interpretation | Semantic headings, citations, limitations |
| Classroom prompt | Guided inquiry | Learning objective, source set, accessible formats |
| Embeddable visualization | Portable exploration | Provenance panel, fallback table, stable deep link |
Can each consequential statement be traced to a dated source or clearly labeled interpretation?
Pass condition: Claims, interpretations, and unresolved gaps are visibly separated.
Does the presentation preserve dignity, agency, privacy, and the difference between institutions and populations?
Pass condition: People are not reduced to risk scores, spectacle, or aggregate stereotypes.
Can a changed source or finding be propagated to every derivative route?
Pass condition: The route has a visible review state, stable identifiers, and correction triggers.
RESEARCH EDITION
This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.
CONTINUE