Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2028-S266Track CH007Q2–Q3 2028

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2028 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 7.9% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Low-moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q2 2028
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 543 · TRACK E018

Commercial fusion or advanced nuclear demonstration changes energy investment — 2028 outlook

In 2028, the modeled trigger or precursor is: a demonstration achieves credible technical and economic milestones for sustained output, maintainability and scalable construction. The event does not instantly transform power supply, but it materially changes expectations about firm low-carbon energy. Capital shifts toward supporting components, fuel cycles, licensing and grid integration. Near-term exposure reflects war-related commodity volatility, geoeconomic confrontation and concentrated supply chains. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 10.4% (Low), with consequence magnitude 5/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2028-S242
Track ID
E018
Illustrative window
Q2 2028
Category
Economic / energy
Impact scope
Global
Outcome direction
Beneficial
Broad geography
Major advanced-energy research and demonstration hubs · United States / Europe / China / international research ecosystem
Coordinate precision
Representative international science-policy hub
Confidence label
Low-moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
10.4%
Band
Low
Magnitude
5/5
Weighted score
10.4/100
Planning priority
4/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

a demonstration achieves credible technical and economic milestones for sustained output, maintainability and scalable construction.

Named actor classes

national laboratories; private energy firms; regulators; utilities; investors; industrial consumers

Warning indicators

independent performance validation; multi-year operating data; standardized licensing; firm power-purchase commitments; repeatable construction milestones

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

capital cost, component lifetime, fuel availability, regulatory approval and whether laboratory performance can be industrialized

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2028: Investment valuations and public funding rise, while independent experts scrutinize cost and replication claims. Governments compete to host first commercial projects.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2029–2031: Supply chains, workforce programs and regulatory frameworks expand. Some competing energy projects are delayed as investors reassess future power prices.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2032–2038: Successful replication could provide abundant firm power and reduce fuel-import dependence; failure to scale would produce a costly investment correction. The strategic effect is therefore large even before widespread deployment.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

IEA World Energy Outlook 2025; used for energy-security, electricity and critical-mineral scenario framing.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-E018
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-E018
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic scenario only. It identifies systemic exposures and resilience needs without providing market-manipulation, sanctions-evasion or infrastructure-disruption instructions. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: E018

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track E018
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S273 7.1% Low 5/5 7.1 3/5 Low-moderate
2028 2028-S242 10.4% Low 5/5 10.4 4/5 Low-moderate
2029 2029-S241 10.7% Low 5/5 10.7 4/5 Low-moderate
2030 2030-S215 13.2% Low 5/5 13.2 4/5 Low-moderate
2031 2031-S229 12.2% Low 5/5 12.2 4/5 Low-moderate
2032 2032-S202 14.6% Low 5/5 14.6 4/5 Low-moderate
2033 2033-S117 16.9% Moderate 5/5 16.9 5/5 Low-moderate
2034 2034-S101 19.3% Moderate 5/5 19.3 5/5 Low-moderate
2035 2035-S109 18.7% Moderate 5/5 18.7 5/5 Low-moderate
2036 2036-S101 20.2% Moderate 5/5 20.2 5/5 Low-moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay