Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2036-S117Track W003Q1 2036

Iran nuclear threshold or safeguards crisis — 2036 outlook

Nuclear proliferation / safeguards crisis · Tehran and Persian Gulf region

Nuclear / WMD · Moderate 17.1% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 5/5

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2036-S279Track CH007Q2–Q3 2036

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2036 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 8.3% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q4 2036
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 2766 · TRACK W008

Russia–NATO arms-control collapse leads to new deployments — 2036 outlook

In 2036, the modeled trigger or precursor is: remaining strategic or theater-level restraints expire or are abandoned without replacement, followed by visible new missile or nuclear deployments. The event is a political and military shift rather than a single explosion. It increases uncertainty about force levels, compresses warning time and raises pressure on non-nuclear allies to host or fund new systems. By the mid-2030s, larger and more diverse arsenals, weaker treaties and dual-use delivery systems increase ambiguity and the cost of miscalculation. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 26.3% (Moderate), with consequence magnitude 5/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2036-S065
Track ID
W008
Illustrative window
Q4 2036
Category
Nuclear / WMD
Impact scope
Global
Outcome direction
Adverse
Broad geography
Moscow, Washington and European basing regions · Russia / United States / Europe
Coordinate precision
Capital reference coordinate
Confidence label
Moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
26.3%
Band
Moderate
Magnitude
5/5
Weighted score
26.3/100
Planning priority
5/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

remaining strategic or theater-level restraints expire or are abandoned without replacement, followed by visible new missile or nuclear deployments.

Named actor classes

Russia; United States; NATO allies; arms-control institutions

Warning indicators

treaty withdrawal notices; suspension of data exchanges; new basing negotiations; test programs; budget shifts toward theater missiles

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

the actual number and location of systems, alliance cohesion and whether informal restraint survives formal treaty collapse

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2036: Governments announce counter-deployments, consultations and major procurement decisions.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2037–2039: Europe and Russia expand missile defenses, long-range fires and continuity planning while verification expertise atrophies.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2040–2046: A more expensive and unstable arms race persists until a future crisis creates political demand for new constraints.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

SIPRI Yearbook 2026 summary; used for conflict, armament, nuclear and escalation-risk baselines. The scenario is hypothetical.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-W008
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-W008
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic risk-reduction scenario; no sensitive facility layout, weapon design, material handling or attack instructions are included. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: W008

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track W008
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S067 19.7% Moderate 5/5 19.7 5/5 Moderate
2028 2028-S087 18.5% Moderate 5/5 18.5 5/5 Moderate
2029 2029-S075 20.3% Moderate 5/5 20.3 5/5 Moderate
2030 2030-S073 21.3% Moderate 5/5 21.3 5/5 Moderate
2031 2031-S056 23.9% Moderate 5/5 23.9 5/5 Moderate
2032 2032-S054 25.0% Moderate 5/5 25.0 5/5 Moderate
2033 2033-S061 24.5% Moderate 5/5 24.5 5/5 Moderate
2034 2034-S055 26.5% Moderate 5/5 26.5 5/5 Moderate
2035 2035-S054 27.5% Moderate 5/5 27.5 5/5 Moderate
2036 2036-S065 26.3% Moderate 5/5 26.3 5/5 Moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay