Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2036-S117Track W003Q1 2036

Iran nuclear threshold or safeguards crisis — 2036 outlook

Nuclear proliferation / safeguards crisis · Tehran and Persian Gulf region

Nuclear / WMD · Moderate 17.1% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 5/5

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2036-S279Track CH007Q2–Q3 2036

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2036 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 8.3% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q3 2036
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 2861 · TRACK M082

Central Sahel: Air or maritime interception causes casualties — 2036 outlook

In 2036, the modeled trigger or precursor is: Amid expanding insurgency, military-led governments and weakening regional security cooperation, a close interception, collision or warning action involving military or coast-guard platforms causes deaths or the loss of a platform. Forces linked to Sahelian governments; jihadist groups; local militias; neighboring states; external security partners enter a fast-moving crisis around the Mali–Burkina Faso–Niger tri-border area and regional capitals. The event remains below the threshold of deliberate total war at first, but the combination of mobilization, information warfare and political pressure creates a credible pathway to wider escalation. Its strategic significance comes from West African political stability, migration routes and counterterrorism capacity. By the mid-2030s, hardened geopolitical blocs and machine-speed command systems could make a short incident strategically consequential before leaders can de-escalate. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 28.9% (Moderate), with consequence magnitude 4/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2036-S160
Track ID
M082
Illustrative window
Q3 2036
Category
Military
Impact scope
Continental
Outcome direction
Adverse
Broad geography
Liptako-Gourma tri-border area · Mali / Burkina Faso / Niger
Coordinate precision
Tri-border region centroid
Confidence label
Moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
28.9%
Band
Moderate
Magnitude
4/5
Weighted score
23.1/100
Planning priority
4/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

Amid expanding insurgency, military-led governments and weakening regional security cooperation, a close interception, collision or warning action involving military or coast-guard platforms causes deaths or the loss of a platform.

Named actor classes

Sahelian governments; jihadist groups; local militias; neighboring states; external security partners

Warning indicators

unsafe intercept reports; navigation interference; unusual patrol density; warning notices to mariners or aviators; public release of cockpit or bridge footage

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

attribution of fault, the status of any missing personnel and whether alliance commitments apply

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2036: Airspace or sea lanes are restricted, search-and-rescue activity begins and both sides release competing evidence while forces move to higher alert. Local consequences include civilian killings, displacement, food insecurity and reduced humanitarian access.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2037–2039: Rules for encounters may be revised, yet escort missions and armed patrols become more frequent and expensive. Over the following one to three years, regional organizations and external partners would reconsider sanctions, basing and security assistance.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2040–2046: The incident contributes to a persistent gray-zone competition in which commercial activity depends on military protection and crisis hotlines. Over four to ten years, mining, transport and rural markets would contract as state authority retreats.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

ACLED Conflict Watchlist 2026; used for conflict-risk baselines and warning indicators. The scenario itself is not an ACLED prediction.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-M082
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-M082
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic defensive scenario only; no operational target, route, vulnerability or attack instructions are provided. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: M082

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track M082
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S152 22.8% Moderate 4/5 18.2 4/5 Moderate
2028 2028-S154 23.6% Moderate 4/5 18.9 4/5 Moderate
2029 2029-S159 23.4% Moderate 4/5 18.7 4/5 Moderate
2030 2030-S144 26.0% Moderate 4/5 20.8 4/5 Moderate
2031 2031-S165 24.2% Moderate 4/5 19.4 4/5 Moderate
2032 2032-S159 27.4% Moderate 4/5 21.9 4/5 Moderate
2033 2033-S167 24.9% Moderate 4/5 19.9 4/5 Moderate
2034 2034-S158 26.8% Moderate 4/5 21.4 4/5 Moderate
2035 2035-S167 27.3% Moderate 4/5 21.8 4/5 Moderate
2036 2036-S160 28.9% Moderate 4/5 23.1 4/5 Moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay