Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2028-S266Track CH007Q2–Q3 2028

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2028 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 7.9% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Low-moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q2 2028
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 519 · TRACK W018

Major powers reach a limited agreement on nuclear risk reduction — 2028 outlook

In 2028, the modeled trigger or precursor is: a severe crisis or sustained diplomatic effort produces agreement on notifications, hotlines, data exchange or limits on the most destabilizing systems. This is a positive high-impact scenario. It does not assume comprehensive disarmament; the pivotal result is restoration of verifiable predictability in a multipolar strategic environment. Near-term risk centers on heightened alert postures, damaged arms-control mechanisms and unresolved regional nuclear disputes. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 12.8% (Low), with consequence magnitude 5/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2028-S218
Track ID
W018
Illustrative window
Q2 2028
Category
Nuclear / WMD
Impact scope
Global
Outcome direction
Beneficial
Broad geography
Geneva and major nuclear capitals · Global
Coordinate precision
Diplomatic hub coordinate
Confidence label
Low-moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
12.8%
Band
Low
Magnitude
5/5
Weighted score
12.8/100
Planning priority
4/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

a severe crisis or sustained diplomatic effort produces agreement on notifications, hotlines, data exchange or limits on the most destabilizing systems.

Named actor classes

United States; Russia; China; other nuclear-armed states; international organizations

Warning indicators

sustained expert talks; reciprocal notifications; restored diplomatic channels; joint technical language; public moderation of nuclear rhetoric

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

domestic ratification, verification scope, inclusion of allies and whether a later crisis overturns the agreement

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2028: Leaders announce confidence-building steps and technical teams begin implementation.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2029–2031: Verification and military-to-military contacts expand, reducing uncertainty during exercises and tests.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2032–2038: The agreement becomes a foundation for broader limits on nuclear, missile, space and AI-enabled command systems, though compliance disputes remain.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

SIPRI Yearbook 2026 summary; used for conflict, armament, nuclear and escalation-risk baselines. The scenario is hypothetical.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-W018
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-W018
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic risk-reduction scenario; no sensitive facility layout, weapon design, material handling or attack instructions are included. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: W018

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track W018
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S223 11.4% Low 5/5 11.4 4/5 Low-moderate
2028 2028-S218 12.8% Low 5/5 12.8 4/5 Low-moderate
2029 2029-S195 14.0% Low 5/5 14.0 4/5 Low-moderate
2030 2030-S239 11.3% Low 5/5 11.3 4/5 Low-moderate
2031 2031-S228 12.3% Low 5/5 12.3 4/5 Low-moderate
2032 2032-S237 12.1% Low 5/5 12.1 4/5 Low-moderate
2033 2033-S237 12.4% Low 5/5 12.4 4/5 Low-moderate
2034 2034-S208 14.2% Low 5/5 14.2 4/5 Low-moderate
2035 2035-S205 14.6% Low 5/5 14.6 4/5 Low-moderate
2036 2036-S212 14.3% Low 5/5 14.3 4/5 Low-moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay