Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2030-S114Track W003Q3 2030

Iran nuclear threshold or safeguards crisis — 2030 outlook

Nuclear proliferation / safeguards crisis · Tehran and Persian Gulf region

Nuclear / WMD · Moderate 16.0% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 5/5

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2030-S267Track CH007Q1–Q2 2030

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2030 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 8.9% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q2 2030
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 1066 · TRACK W020

Breakthrough in nuclear verification technology improves transparency — 2030 outlook

In 2030, the modeled trigger or precursor is: new remote sensing, tamper-resistant monitoring or privacy-preserving measurement tools become politically acceptable for verification. This positive scenario lowers the trade-off between protecting sensitive design information and proving compliance. It could make future agreements more feasible even in a low-trust environment. By the early 2030s, expanding arsenals and new delivery systems complicate warning, verification and escalation control. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 22.6% (Moderate), with consequence magnitude 4/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2030-S165
Track ID
W020
Illustrative window
Q2 2030
Category
Nuclear / WMD
Impact scope
Global
Outcome direction
Beneficial
Broad geography
Vienna, Geneva and international research centers · Global
Coordinate precision
International-organization hub coordinate
Confidence label
Moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
22.6%
Band
Moderate
Magnitude
4/5
Weighted score
18.1/100
Planning priority
4/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

new remote sensing, tamper-resistant monitoring or privacy-preserving measurement tools become politically acceptable for verification.

Named actor classes

IAEA; nuclear-armed states; research institutions; treaty organizations

Warning indicators

successful international trials; shared technical standards; funding for monitoring networks; agreement on data custody and privacy

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

whether major powers trust the technology, whether it can resist spoofing and whether political disputes still block access

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2030: Pilot programs and technical demonstrations begin under international oversight.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2031–2033: States integrate the tools into safeguards, dismantlement or test-notification arrangements.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2034–2040: Verification becomes more continuous and less dependent on political access, supporting a new generation of arms-control agreements.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

IAEA public material; used for nuclear safeguards, security and safety framing. No sensitive facility details are included.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-W020
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-W020
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic risk-reduction scenario; no sensitive facility layout, weapon design, material handling or attack instructions are included. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: W020

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track W020
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S165 19.7% Moderate 4/5 15.8 4/5 Moderate
2028 2028-S166 21.7% Moderate 4/5 17.4 4/5 Moderate
2029 2029-S169 21.7% Moderate 4/5 17.4 4/5 Moderate
2030 2030-S165 22.6% Moderate 4/5 18.1 4/5 Moderate
2031 2031-S171 23.3% Moderate 4/5 18.6 4/5 Moderate
2032 2032-S177 23.6% Moderate 4/5 18.9 4/5 Moderate
2033 2033-S166 24.9% Moderate 4/5 19.9 4/5 Moderate
2034 2034-S155 27.9% Moderate 4/5 22.3 4/5 Moderate
2035 2035-S165 27.7% Moderate 4/5 22.2 4/5 Moderate
2036 2036-S166 27.3% Moderate 4/5 21.8 4/5 Moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay