Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2032-S120Track W003Q1 2032

Iran nuclear threshold or safeguards crisis — 2032 outlook

Nuclear proliferation / safeguards crisis · Tehran and Persian Gulf region

Nuclear / WMD · Moderate 15.8% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 5/5

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2032-S281Track CH007Q2–Q3 2032

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2032 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 7.6% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q3 2032
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 1672 · TRACK M086

DRC–Rwanda and Great Lakes: Localized clash expands beyond the established line — 2032 outlook

In 2032, the modeled trigger or precursor is: Amid armed-group offensives, cross-border accusations and competition over territory and minerals, a patrol confrontation, disputed strike or localized offensive produces casualties and reciprocal fire. Forces linked to DRC; Rwanda; Uganda; M23 and other armed groups; regional forces; UN actors enter a fast-moving crisis around North Kivu, border crossings and strategic roads around Goma. The event remains below the threshold of deliberate total war at first, but the combination of mobilization, information warfare and political pressure creates a credible pathway to wider escalation. Its strategic significance comes from Great Lakes stability, critical-mineral supply and a major humanitarian emergency. By the early 2030s, denser missile forces, autonomous systems and entrenched alliance deployments increase both deterrence and the chance of rapid escalation. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 24.4% (Moderate), with consequence magnitude 4/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2032-S171
Track ID
M086
Illustrative window
Q3 2032
Category
Military
Impact scope
Continental
Outcome direction
Adverse
Broad geography
Goma and North Kivu · Democratic Republic of the Congo / Rwanda / Uganda
Coordinate precision
City/conflict-region reference coordinate
Confidence label
Moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
24.4%
Band
Moderate
Magnitude
4/5
Weighted score
19.5/100
Planning priority
4/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

Amid armed-group offensives, cross-border accusations and competition over territory and minerals, a patrol confrontation, disputed strike or localized offensive produces casualties and reciprocal fire.

Named actor classes

DRC; Rwanda; Uganda; M23 and other armed groups; regional forces; UN actors

Warning indicators

forward deployments; reserve call-ups; evacuation notices; canceled leave; increased reconnaissance; suspension of local hotlines

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

whether leaders can contain domestic pressure, distinguish signaling from preparation and preserve a credible off-ramp

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2032: Forces reinforce the area, suspend local movement and exchange limited strikes while political leaders face pressure to demonstrate resolve. Local consequences include mass displacement, urban siege conditions and severe pressure on camps and health systems.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2033–2035: A temporary ceasefire may emerge, but new fortifications, wider surveillance and more permissive rules of engagement increase recurrence risk. Over the following one to three years, regional military coalitions and diplomatic mediation would be reconfigured.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2036–2042: The confrontation entrenches a militarized boundary and shifts budgets toward readiness, resilience and precision strike capabilities. Over four to ten years, formal and illicit mineral trade would shift while investment and transport are disrupted.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

ACLED Conflict Watchlist 2026; used for conflict-risk baselines and warning indicators. The scenario itself is not an ACLED prediction.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-M086
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-M086
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic defensive scenario only; no operational target, route, vulnerability or attack instructions are provided. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: M086

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track M086
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S138 25.7% Moderate 4/5 20.6 4/5 Moderate
2028 2028-S139 27.2% Moderate 4/5 21.8 4/5 Moderate
2029 2029-S145 26.6% Moderate 4/5 21.3 4/5 Moderate
2030 2030-S154 24.3% Moderate 4/5 19.4 4/5 Moderate
2031 2031-S166 24.1% Moderate 4/5 19.3 4/5 Moderate
2032 2032-S171 24.4% Moderate 4/5 19.5 4/5 Moderate
2033 2033-S157 27.0% Moderate 4/5 21.6 4/5 Moderate
2034 2034-S162 26.3% Moderate 4/5 21.0 4/5 Moderate
2035 2035-S169 25.9% Moderate 4/5 20.7 4/5 Moderate
2036 2036-S172 25.1% Moderate 4/5 20.1 4/5 Moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay