Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2034-S116Track W003Q3 2034

Iran nuclear threshold or safeguards crisis — 2034 outlook

Nuclear proliferation / safeguards crisis · Tehran and Persian Gulf region

Nuclear / WMD · Moderate 17.2% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 5/5

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2034-S286Track CH007Q1–Q2 2034

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2034 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 7.3% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q1 2034
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 2178 · TRACK W017

Global strategic arms-control framework breaks down — 2034 outlook

In 2034, the modeled trigger or precursor is: multiple states withdraw from, suspend or stop implementing key verification and restraint arrangements. The event is cumulative rather than instantaneous. Its effect is to make force estimates, intentions and crisis signals less transparent across several nuclear relationships at once. By the mid-2030s, larger and more diverse arsenals, weaker treaties and dual-use delivery systems increase ambiguity and the cost of miscalculation. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 23.1% (Moderate), with consequence magnitude 5/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2034-S077
Track ID
W017
Illustrative window
Q1 2034
Category
Nuclear / WMD
Impact scope
Global
Outcome direction
Adverse
Broad geography
United Nations and major nuclear capitals · Global
Coordinate precision
UN/policy hub coordinate
Confidence label
Moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
23.1%
Band
Moderate
Magnitude
5/5
Weighted score
23.1/100
Planning priority
5/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

multiple states withdraw from, suspend or stop implementing key verification and restraint arrangements.

Named actor classes

nuclear-armed states; United Nations; treaty organizations; allied and non-aligned states

Warning indicators

withdrawal notices; unpaid treaty institutions; inspection suspensions; refusal of data exchanges; new warhead or delivery-system programs

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

whether informal restraint persists, which states seek independent capabilities and whether new formats can include emerging technologies

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2034: Emergency diplomacy fails to preserve data exchanges or inspections, and states announce modernization or deployment plans.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2035–2037: Military budgets and hedging behavior rise; non-nuclear states question security guarantees and treaty value.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2038–2044: The world operates with weaker verification and more nuclear actors unless a later crisis produces a new, broader framework.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

SIPRI Yearbook 2026 summary; used for conflict, armament, nuclear and escalation-risk baselines. The scenario is hypothetical.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-W017
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-W017
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic risk-reduction scenario; no sensitive facility layout, weapon design, material handling or attack instructions are included. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: W017

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track W017
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S085 17.5% Moderate 5/5 17.5 5/5 Moderate
2028 2028-S089 18.4% Moderate 5/5 18.4 5/5 Moderate
2029 2029-S091 18.1% Moderate 5/5 18.1 5/5 Moderate
2030 2030-S075 21.1% Moderate 5/5 21.1 5/5 Moderate
2031 2031-S063 22.6% Moderate 5/5 22.6 5/5 Moderate
2032 2032-S071 23.0% Moderate 5/5 23.0 5/5 Moderate
2033 2033-S064 24.1% Moderate 5/5 24.1 5/5 Moderate
2034 2034-S077 23.1% Moderate 5/5 23.1 5/5 Moderate
2035 2035-S081 22.8% Moderate 5/5 22.8 5/5 Moderate
2036 2036-S073 24.6% Moderate 5/5 24.6 5/5 Moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay