Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.

FICTIONAL PLANNING REGISTER

World-event scenarios, 2027–2036

Explore 3,000 annualized scenario rows from the supplied workbook. Every row is fictional, every numerical estimate is source-authored and non-calibrated, and every consequence path is illustrative rather than predictive.

Browse scenarios Inspect evidence lineage Inspect assumptions Return to the 1999–2026 record
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Source-bounded scenario register
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
2027–2036
Review
Exact workbook bytes preserved; scenario assumptions, baselines, and estimates require claim-specific review
How to read this register

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST. Probability fields are source-authored analytical estimates, not calibrated forecasts and not additive. Consequence scores are comparison aids, not expected casualties, financial losses, or site rankings. Coordinates are broad centroids, not target locations.

Scenario rows
3,000
Scenario tracks
300
Years
2027–2036
Rows per year
300
Baseline source URLs
19

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2034-S116Track W003Q3 2034

Iran nuclear threshold or safeguards crisis — 2034 outlook

Nuclear proliferation / safeguards crisis · Tehran and Persian Gulf region

Nuclear / WMD · Moderate 17.2% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 5/5

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

2034-S286Track CH007Q1–Q2 2034

Large earthquake strikes a major urban fault zone — 2034 outlook

Earthquake / urban catastrophe · Istanbul or a comparable high-exposure metropolitan fault zone

Climate / health · Low 7.3% source estimate · magnitude 5/5 · priority 3/5
FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST The provenance of this block requires editorial review.
Confidence
Moderate
Sources
1
Independent corroboration
0
Date range
Q4 2034
Review
Scenario premise, probability, and consequences require claim-specific review

FICTIONAL SCENARIO — NOT HISTORICAL, NOT A FORECAST

SOURCE ROW 2271 · TRACK M087

DRC–Rwanda and Great Lakes: Air or maritime interception causes casualties — 2034 outlook

In 2034, the modeled trigger or precursor is: Amid armed-group offensives, cross-border accusations and competition over territory and minerals, a close interception, collision or warning action involving military or coast-guard platforms causes deaths or the loss of a platform. Forces linked to DRC; Rwanda; Uganda; M23 and other armed groups; regional forces; UN actors enter a fast-moving crisis around North Kivu, border crossings and strategic roads around Goma. The event remains below the threshold of deliberate total war at first, but the combination of mobilization, information warfare and political pressure creates a credible pathway to wider escalation. Its strategic significance comes from Great Lakes stability, critical-mineral supply and a major humanitarian emergency. By the mid-2030s, hardened geopolitical blocs and machine-speed command systems could make a short incident strategically consequential before leaders can de-escalate. The annual probability is an approximate analytical estimate of 24.1% (Moderate), with consequence magnitude 4/5. This row is a plausible, overlapping scenario—not a prediction.

Stable scenario ID
2034-S170
Track ID
M087
Illustrative window
Q4 2034
Category
Military
Impact scope
Continental
Outcome direction
Adverse
Broad geography
Goma and North Kivu · Democratic Republic of the Congo / Rwanda / Uganda
Coordinate precision
City/conflict-region reference coordinate
Confidence label
Moderate
Operational use
Not allowed by this educational transformation

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Annual estimate
24.1%
Band
Moderate
Magnitude
4/5
Weighted score
19.3/100
Planning priority
4/5

Workbook formula: probability ÷ 100 × magnitude × 20. It is a comparison aid only. Scenario probabilities overlap and must not be summed.

Scenario premise

Amid armed-group offensives, cross-border accusations and competition over territory and minerals, a close interception, collision or warning action involving military or coast-guard platforms causes deaths or the loss of a platform.

Named actor classes

DRC; Rwanda; Uganda; M23 and other armed groups; regional forces; UN actors

Warning indicators

unsafe intercept reports; navigation interference; unusual patrol density; warning notices to mariners or aviators; public release of cockpit or bridge footage

Indicators are planning prompts, not proof that the scenario is occurring and not a monitoring or targeting instruction.

Key uncertainties

attribution of fault, the status of any missing personnel and whether alliance commitments apply

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE PATH — NOT A PREDICTION

Conditional consequence sequence

  1. 0–30 days

    If this scenario occurs in 2034: Airspace or sea lanes are restricted, search-and-rescue activity begins and both sides release competing evidence while forces move to higher alert. Local consequences include mass displacement, urban siege conditions and severe pressure on camps and health systems.

  2. 1–3 years

    During 2035–2037: Rules for encounters may be revised, yet escort missions and armed patrols become more frequent and expensive. Over the following one to three years, regional military coalitions and diplomatic mediation would be reconfigured.

  3. 4–10 years

    Across 2038–2044: The incident contributes to a persistent gray-zone competition in which commercial activity depends on military protection and crisis hotlines. Over four to ten years, formal and illicit mineral trade would shift while investment and transport are disrupted.

Baseline source — not endorsement of this scenario or estimate

ACLED Conflict Watchlist 2026; used for conflict-risk baselines and warning indicators. The scenario itself is not an ACLED prediction.

Open the workbook’s baseline source

BASELINE START POINT ONLY

Track evidence review remains open

Review ID
SER-M087
Review state
READY FOR CLAIM-SPECIFIC REVIEW
Premise verification
NOT REVIEWED
Probability calibration
NOT PERFORMED
Independent origins
0
Assignment state
OPEN_UNASSIGNED

A source relationship records where review can begin. It does not verify this fictional premise, calibrate the annual estimates, validate the consequence path, or grant operational authority.

Open the claim-specific review docket

ASSUMPTION IS NOT FACT

Track assumptions and retirement remain open

Assumption ID
SAR-M087
Premise review
NOT REVIEWED
Indicator review
NOT REVIEWED
Retirement state
NOT EVALUATED

The sidecar exposes dependencies, disconfirming questions, alternative explanations, false-alarm risks, consequence interruptions, and retirement triggers. It does not predict, monitor, or retire this track.

Open the assumption review docket
Safety and use boundary

Strategic defensive scenario only; no operational target, route, vulnerability or attack instructions are provided. This site adds no tactical target data, exploit steps, evasion methods, weapon construction, casualty optimization, or authorization for real-world action.

SOURCE-AUTHORED ANALYTICAL ESTIMATE — NOT CALIBRATED OR ADDITIVE

Ten-year track: M087

The workbook annualizes the same scenario family once per year so readers can compare how its assumptions and numerical estimates change. This is not a time-series forecast.

Source-authored annualized rows for track M087
YearScenario IDProbabilityBandMagnitudeWeighted scorePriorityConfidence
2027 2027-S154 22.6% Moderate 4/5 18.1 4/5 Moderate
2028 2028-S170 21.4% Moderate 4/5 17.1 4/5 Moderate
2029 2029-S160 23.4% Moderate 4/5 18.7 4/5 Moderate
2030 2030-S168 22.0% Moderate 4/5 17.6 4/5 Moderate
2031 2031-S174 22.8% Moderate 4/5 18.2 4/5 Moderate
2032 2032-S182 22.4% Moderate 4/5 17.9 4/5 Moderate
2033 2033-S179 22.6% Moderate 4/5 18.1 4/5 Moderate
2034 2034-S170 24.1% Moderate 4/5 19.3 4/5 Moderate
2035 2035-S184 22.3% Moderate 4/5 17.8 4/5 Moderate
2036 2036-S175 23.9% Moderate 4/5 19.1 4/5 Moderate

READ THE DATA

Scenario-register literacy

Learn why repeated annual rows are intentional, why probability bands do not add, and why warning indicators are not event confirmation.

Open the guide

CHECK THE BOUNDARY

History, scenarios, and projections

Review the rules that prevent the 1999–2026 historical ledger from silently becoming future fact.

Open the boundary guide

RETURN TO HISTORY

1999–2026 event explorer

Browse the unchanged historical and contemporary source records before crossing into fictional material.

Open historical replay