Educational companion dossier · Fact, interpretation, lived experience, clinical education, fiction, and mechanics are labeled separately. Scope & safety
PsychologicalWar.orgPeople before labels.
CLINICAL EDUCATION — NOT DIAGNOSIS

INTERNATIONAL GAME SYSTEMS

Cognitive Safety, Reality Anchoring, and Respectful Support

A non-diagnostic safety framework for AI and fictional espionage content that avoids affirming frightening real-world beliefs, avoids humiliation, and routes urgent needs to human support.

Read the working brief Choose a learning path
LEVEL 1

ORIENTATION

Why this matters

CLINICAL EDUCATION — NOT DIAGNOSIS

One-sentence brief

Espionage themes, personalized AI, sleep loss, isolation, and persuasive dialogue can become distressing for some people. The platform should reduce escalation while preserving dignity, agency, privacy, and access to support.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Three key points

  1. Do not confirm that a player has a real secret mission, surveillance target, supernatural status, or special relationship with the AI.
  2. Acknowledge feelings without endorsing an unverified explanation.
  3. Direct evidence of immediate danger triggers human safety support, not a diagnosis or punishment.
LEVEL 2

WORKING BRIEF

Evidence, context, and limits

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Keep fiction and reality visibly separate

The interface labels fictional organizations, missions, AI characters, role-play spaces, and generated content. It never claims that game events prove real surveillance, recruitment, hidden messages, sentience, or cosmic significance.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Respond without total affirmation or ridicule

A safe response can recognize fear, confusion, excitement, or distress; state the limits of the system; encourage a pause and independent verification; and offer contact with a trusted person or local professional support. It does not argue aggressively or elaborate the belief.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Add healthy conversational friction

The AI asks grounding questions, distinguishes observation from interpretation, avoids flattery that assigns special destiny, and declines to build escalating conspiratorial or grandiose narratives about the user’s real life.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Give players control over intensity

Players can disable personalization, reset optional conversation memory, reduce espionage-themed prompts, mute an NPC, pause notifications, set session reminders, or switch to authored dialogue without losing progression.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

Use direct safety signals

Statements indicating immediate self-harm, harm to others, medical emergency, inability to care for basic needs, or acute danger are routed to trained human support and location-appropriate emergency information. The system does not diagnose from a theme or unusual belief alone.

REAL-WORLD INTERPRETIVE

No punishment for seeking help

Asking for support, reporting distress, using accessibility settings, or disclosing a diagnosis cannot reduce rank, trigger a security score, cause a public label, or become evidence of disloyalty. Records are minimized and separated from game enforcement.

LEVEL 3

COMPLETE DOSSIER

Limitations, game links, and review context

DISPUTED / MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS

Known limitations and gaps

  • These pages are authored design syntheses, not independent validation of every claim in the supplied reports.
  • No country, culture, language, religion, diagnosis, disability, migration status, income level, or region is assigned a hidden competence, honesty, criminality, loyalty, or risk modifier.
  • The public edition omits operational intrusion, evasion, targeting, coercion, weapons, exploit, and real-person profiling instructions.
  • Regional, economic, accessibility, clinical, lived-experience, legal, privacy, and consumer-protection review remain open human gates.
  • RogueIntelligence.org remains authoritative for live game state; these pages describe design principles and correction boundaries.
LEVEL 4

RESEARCH EDITION

Sources, methods, and stable links

REAL-WORLD VERIFIED

Method and corrections

This page follows the public method for provenance, confidence, source independence, alternative accounts, limitations, review state, and visible correction.

Read the methodView corrections
NEXT

CONTINUE

Related learning

International Game SystemsAfter-Action Accountability, Civilian Harm, and Institutional RepairA post-mission system that reconstructs events, preserves uncertainty, records harm, hears affected perspectives, and requires remedy instead of rewarding concealment or punitive spectacle.International Game SystemsAI NPC Identity Disclosure, Consent, and Human–AI BoundariesA clear rule that players can tell when they are interacting with an AI-controlled character, what the system can remember, and which decisions always remain deterministic or human-reviewed.International Game SystemsAI Reliability, Corrections, Human Oversight, and ContestabilityA lifecycle for testing, monitoring, correcting, overriding, and retiring generative NPC behavior without pretending that fluency is accuracy or that a model can adjudicate its own mistakes.International Game SystemsContracts, Escrow, Clear Settlement, and Dispute ResolutionA player-contract framework that makes obligations, collateral, completion evidence, fees, cancellation, failure, and appeal visible before acceptance. Learning pathAI NPC Reliability, Consent, and Cognitive SafetyKeep generative NPCs identifiable, bounded by authoritative game state, correctable, privacy-preserving, and unable to turn model error, flattery, distress, diagnosis, or player vulnerability into manipulation or punishment.